管理学的价值性困境:回顾、争鸣与评论

发布时间：2018-07-14 20:58

【摘要】：历经百年发展,管理学仍然面临着诸多困境和挑战,人们对学科内一些元问题的认识仍然充满争议:管理学的发展因学科内关于管理学基本性质的争鸣得到了促进,但这些不同的观点也恰恰反映了管理学的发展仍处于"前科学"阶段;管理学大量借鉴了相关学科的知识,这促进了管理学本身的发展,但也随之带来理论界对于学科本身合法性的质疑;为了维护学科合法性,学者们不断向"科学化"靠拢,但又面临着"实践相关性"的挑战。这些争议意味着管理学在学科的基本性质、学科的合法性、实践相关性、学科构建的方式和方法等诸多方面仍然存在着矛盾和困境,即管理学面临着学科价值性和实践价值性的双重窘境。厘清不同争论之间的差异性与普遍性,对于以何种标准判断什么是有效的管理学研究,进而对管理学本身进行清晰定位十分重要。为此,本专题围绕管理学百年来针对一些元问题所阐发的争鸣性观点进行了回顾、比较和评述。
[Abstract]:After a hundred years of development, management is still facing many difficulties and challenges, people's understanding of some meta-problems in the discipline is still full of controversy: the development of management science has been promoted by the controversy about the basic nature of management. However, these different views also reflect that the development of management is still in the "pre-science" stage; management has borrowed a lot of knowledge from relevant disciplines, which has promoted the development of management itself. In order to maintain the legitimacy of the discipline, scholars are constantly approaching to the "scientific", but facing the challenge of "practical relevance". These disputes mean that there are still contradictions and dilemmas in the basic nature of the subject, the legitimacy of the discipline, the relevance of practice, the ways and methods of discipline construction, etc. Management is faced with the dual dilemma of discipline value and practical value. It is very important to clarify the difference and universality of different debates in order to judge what is effective management research and then to clearly position management itself. Therefore, this paper reviews, compares and comments on the contending views of some meta-problems in the past hundred years of management.
【作者单位】：东北财经大学工商管理学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目(10CGL006)的资助
【分类号】：C93

【共引文献】