批判性分析由“解构组织”采取的方式方法

发布时间：2016-05-11 13:42

论文题目：Students are asked to write a critical analysis, based on the suggested reading, of the methodological approach adopted by the paper entitled: Kilduff,M.(1993).“Deconstructing Organizations
论文语言：英语论文 English
论文专业：Management
字数：2000
学校国家：英国
是否有数据处理要求：否
您的学校：Keele University.英国排名40
论文用于：BA essay 本科课程作业
补充要求和说明：
Students are asked to write a critical analysis, based on the suggested reading, of the methodological approach adopted by the paper entitled: Kilduff,M.(1993).“Deconstructing Organizations", The Academy of Management Review,18/1:13-31
需要按照学校的reading list。课程

1.0 Introduction 介绍

组织研究，作为社会科学的一部分，涵盖非常广泛的领域，也受到了如此多的不同学者的关注。有这么多不同的研究方法，如解构主义，实证主义、形而上学和隐喻、解释学等也有一些基础性的贡献的文本，就像月和西蒙的组织，贾可德里达的这篇短文写作学等分析方法采用了“解构”组织。那是在上世纪90年代初期由马丁吉尔达夫写的。1993，本文已被打印出来，，在管理科学评论。为了分析这一文本的方法论，主要有五个部分在这些短文章。第一部分是关于马丁吉尔达夫文本的研究过程；第二部分综述了用于马丁吉尔达夫主要研究文献；三部分是关于马丁吉尔达夫文本的主要方法；四部分关注的核心话题：解构主义、五部分是对全文的一个简短的总结。在这篇短文中的推理过程，案例研究法和对比分析将作为主要的推理方法和解构的方法也是本篇的重点课题，但它不是第一个主题介绍。Organizational studies, as part of social science, cover very wide fields and have also been concerned by so many different scholars. There are so many different researching methods, such as deconstruction, positivist, metaphysical and metaphorical, hermeneutic etc. There are also some foundational contribution texts, just like March and Simon’s Organizations, Jacques Derrida’s Of Grammatology etc.  This short essay focuses on analyzing the methodological approach adopted by the paper of “Deconstructing Organizations”. It was written by Martin Kilduff at the initial stage of 1990s. In 1993, this text has been printed out in The Academy of Management Review. For analyzing the methodological approach of this text, there are five main parts in these short essays. Part one is about the researching process of Martin Kilduff’s text; Part two reviews the main literatures used in the paper of Martin Kilduff; Part three is about the main methodologies of Martin Kilduff’s text; Part four concerns about the core topic: deconstructive approach and part five is a short summary of the whole paper. In the reasoning process of this short essay, case approach and comparative analysis will be used as two main reasoning methods and deconstructive approach is also the focusing topic of this short essay, but it is not the first topic in this paper. 

2.0 Research process of ‘Deconstructing Organizations’ 解构组织的研究过程

The same as the topic, core content of Martin Kilduff’s text is “deconstructing organizations”, which occupies over 60% text’s length. Before the core part, Martin Kilduff introduced deconstruction briefly and following the core part, Martin Kilduff summarized the limits of the text. In the process of illustrating deconstructing organizations, Martin Kilduff madethe analysis from following aspects: the structure of presence and absence, programming the body and programming the mind, the organization as writing machine, the ideology of programming, the unanticipated consequences of programmed organizations and a confessional tale. All of these composing and writing is for, just utilizing Martin Kilduff’s original words --- “my motive for this deconstruction is not only to exposes textual limitation, but also to permanently change the way the text is used in management education and research.”

For achieving this objective, at the beginning of the text, Martin Kilduff did not specially emphasizes or illustrated deconstruction or deconstructing organizations, but strongly commend March and Simon’s Organizations from this text’s contribution in the area of organizational studies. After praising about March and Simon’s text, Martin Kilduff put forward the key object out of this paper as “a dissenting perspective”. Martin Kilduff used this “dissenting perspective” to “reevaluate the appearance of progress in organizational theory”. And then in the following part, Martin Kilduff interpreted “deconstruction” in detail with the supporting of so many different scholars’ studies. In the process of illustrating “deconstruction”, Martin Kilduff first defined the position of Jacques Derrida in organizational studies, just like “the most influential post-structuralist philosopher” and “extravagantly convoluted” (Agger, 1991). For Martin Kilduff’s understanding about Jacques Derrida’s text, deconstruction is one writing way. In the article of Jacques Derrida, deconstruction is used to question the relation and presentation way of different concepts in one text; it is one way to open the conflicting relationships in the internal part of the text for the readers. Then deconstructions organizations are illustrated from so many aspects by Martin Kilduff. As the concentrated content, this part will be analyzed in the methodologies of this paper. In the limits part, Martin Kilduff gave out two limiting factors: “exclusion and distortion of previous texts”; difficult to relate textual analysis with institutions. In the conclusion part, Martin Kilduff summarized that March and Simon’s text is an eternal classic in traditional organization studies; in understanding standard textual, deconstruction just might be “particularly useful”. 

3.0 Literature Review of ‘Deconstructing Organizations’ 
4.0 Main Methodology of ‘Deconstructing Organizations’ 
5.0 Deconstructive Approach 

6.0 Conclusion 总结

In one sentence, the reasoning methods of Martin Kilduff in text---deconstructing organizations are very strict and the reasoning process is very well-conceived. It is worth learning and studying for me in the future researching process.  Martin Kilduff reviews so many literatures and the conclusion is sufficiently to get. Even like this, there are still some shortcomings, such as Martin Kilduff concerns too much on two papers and the researching methods are also not objective enough or interested into readers. But generally speaking, author of this paper believes the researching and studying of Martin Kilduff is success and convincing. 

7.0 References文献

Martin Kilduff. (1993). Deconstructing Organizations. The Academy of Management Review. Vol.18, No.1, P13-P31
March J. G. & Simon H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley
Agger B. (1991). Critical theory, poststructuralism, postmodernism: their sociological relevance. Annual Review of Sociology. Vol.17, P105-P131
 Sullivan Patricia. (2004). Jacques Derrida Dies; Deconstructionist Philosopher. Washington Post, October 10, 2004
Pidgen Charles R. (1990). On a defence of derrida. The Critical review. Issues30–32, P40–P41
Rihoux Benoît. (2006). Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Systematic Comparative Methods: Recent Advances and Remaining Challenges for Social Science Research. International Sociology. Vol.21, No.5
Savin-Baden M. & Major C. (2013). Qualitative Research: The Essential Guide to Theory and Practice. Routledge
Fischer C.T. (2005). Qualitative research methods for psychologists: Introduction through empirical studies. Academic Press.

本文编号：44005