基于费效分析的航材封存方式选择

发布时间：2018-06-10 06:09

本文选题：航材 + 封存方法　；参考：《包装工程》2017年23期

【摘要】：目的利用费效分析对不同类型航材的封存包装方式进行评估。方法针对不同类型的航材,利用灰色层次分析法计算不同封存方法的效能指标,将封存包装费用分解,利用数据拟合方式分别得到不同类型费用的曲线,通过效能-费用比确定不同类型航材的最佳封存方式。结果封存的效能-费用比与航材体积相关性较强。对体积较小的金属类航材,气相封存的效能-费用比最高,特别是航材的价值也较小时,气相封存的优势明显;体积大于1500 cm~3的金属类航材,综合封存方式效能-费用比最高;对于机载设备类的航材,综合封存的效能-费用比始终高于干燥空气封存。结论价值和体积都较小的金属类航材应选择气相封存,其余金属类航材和全部机载设备应当选择综合封存方式。
[Abstract]:Objective to evaluate the packing methods of different types of air materials by cost-effect analysis. Methods according to different types of materials, the efficiency index of different storage methods was calculated by using grey analytic hierarchy process (AHP), the cost of packing was decomposed, and the curves of different types of cost were obtained by data fitting. Determine the best storage method for different types of materials by efficiency-cost ratio. Results the efficiency-cost ratio of storage was strongly correlated with the volume of aeronautical materials. For the metal aeronautical materials with small volume, the efficiency / cost ratio of gas phase sealing is the highest, especially the value of aeronautical materials is small, the advantage of gas phase storage is obvious, and the efficiency-cost ratio of the comprehensive storage mode is the highest for metal aeronautical materials whose volume is more than 1500 cm~3. For airborne equipment materials, the efficiency-cost ratio of integrated storage is always higher than that of dry air storage. Conclusion the gas phase seal should be used for the metal materials with small value and volume, and the comprehensive storage method should be chosen for the other metal materials and all the airborne equipments.
【作者单位】：空军勤务学院;陆军航空兵学院;
【分类号】：TB48

【相似文献】