闭环供应链企业合作减排与定价策略

发布时间：2018-08-20 16:43

【摘要】：闭环供应链中制造商和零售商不同的合作减排模式对减排率、回收率、定价、利润和减排效果会产生不同影响。本文考虑由单一制造商、零售商和第三方回收商组成的闭环供应链系统,构建不合作、半合作(分担减排成本和议价)、完全合作形式闭环供应链的减排率、回收率和价格决策模型,并进行对比分析。结果表明:在总体上,完全合作减排在实现最高减排水平、最高回收水平和最低零售价格的同时,取得了最高的联合利润和最高的减排效用;对于两种半合作减排方式,除制造商利润外,议价半合作减排的减排水平、回收水平、批发价格、零售价格、零售商利润、联合利润、第三方利润和减排效用均高于分担减排成本契约半合作减排。现实中最理想的完全合作减排合作模式很难达成,因此政府应采取措施着重促成两种半合作减排方式。
[Abstract]:Different cooperative emission reduction modes between manufacturers and retailers in closed-loop supply chain have different effects on emission reduction rate, recovery rate, pricing, profit and emission reduction effect. This paper considers a closed-loop supply chain system composed of a single manufacturer, a retailer and a third-party recycler to construct a non-cooperative, semi-cooperative (sharing of emission reduction costs and bargaining), and a complete cooperative form of closed-loop supply chain emission reduction rate. Recovery rate and price decision model were compared and analyzed. The results show that, on the whole, the full cooperative emission reduction achieves the highest emission reduction level, the highest recovery level and the lowest retail price, at the same time, it achieves the highest joint profit and the highest emission reduction utility. In addition to manufacturers' profits, the emission reduction level, recovery level, wholesale price, retailer profit, joint profit, third party profit and emission reduction utility of bargaining price semi-cooperative emission reduction are all higher than those of cost sharing contract and semi-cooperative emission reduction. It is difficult to achieve the ideal cooperative emission reduction cooperation mode in reality, so the government should take measures to promote two semi-cooperative emission reduction modes.
【作者单位】：上海海事大学经济管理学院;北陆先端科学技术大学院大学知识科学学院;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金资助项目,项目编号:71373157 上海海事大学研究生创新基金项目,项目编号:2016ycx068
【分类号】：F274

【相似文献】