供应商—客户市场势力、商业信用与企业绩效的实证研究
[Abstract]:As a short-term financing tool, commercial credit plays an irreplaceable role in easing the financing constraints faced by enterprises and optimizing the capital management of enterprises. The relationship between upstream and downstream enterprises in supply chain has also been the focus of academic attention. Business credit also accounts for a large proportion of the transactions between enterprises and upstream suppliers and downstream customers, and the supply and acquisition of commercial credit for enterprises in the supply chain are also affected by the market forces of suppliers and customers. But what exactly do they affect the relationship? And now the competition among enterprises has already entered the supply chain level, the relative position of enterprises, suppliers and customers may have a profound impact on the acquisition and provision of business credit, and commercial credit as an important financing tool, Naturally, it will also affect the performance of enterprises. What is the impact between them? In order to improve the performance of enterprises, how to deal with the relationship between suppliers and customers? These problems are worthy of our in-depth discussion and empirical test. Therefore, this paper studies the influence of supplier market power and customer market power on the commercial credit, which is related to the market power of the supplier and the market power of the customer, and the relationship between the business credit and the performance of the enterprise. At the same time, it also analyzes the influence mechanism of supplier market power and customer market power on enterprise performance and the role of commercial credit in the relationship between them. By selecting the data of A share listed companies in Shenzhen Stock Exchange from 2006 to 2011, the empirical analysis shows that: (1) the stronger the market power of suppliers, the less commercial credit enterprises obtain from suppliers. The profitability of enterprises will also decline; Obtaining commercial credit from suppliers is negatively correlated with enterprise performance. Business credit acquisition also plays an intermediary role in the relationship between supplier market power and enterprise performance. (2) the stronger the customer market power, the stronger the customer market power. The more business credit enterprises provide to customers, the less commercial credit they get from customers; For state-owned enterprises, the stronger the customer market power, the lower their profitability, but the relationship between them is not obvious. (3) for state-owned enterprises, the commercial credit provided to customers is positively related to enterprise performance. Moreover, the commercial credit has also played an intermediary role in the relationship between customer market power and enterprise performance. However, for non-state-owned enterprises, the commercial credit provided to customers has not significantly improved the performance of enterprises, nor is its intermediary role obvious. (4) from the perspective of the whole supply chain, There is an obvious hidden rule in the acquisition and supply of commercial credit between enterprises in the supply chain, that is, the more commercial credit enterprises obtain from upstream suppliers, the more downstream customers will ask enterprises to provide more commercial credit. The whole supply chain has a consistent debt default.
【学位授予单位】:福州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:F275;F274
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 池仁勇;胡淑静;;技术先进性、品牌、网络化水平与市场势力:浙江产品实证[J];科技管理研究;2012年24期
2 曾次玲,张步涵,王大光,林因;电力市场中的市场势力问题初探[J];水电能源科学;2002年02期
3 刘志彪;产业的市场势力理论及其估计方法[J];当代财经;2002年11期
4 刘志彪,石奇;竞争、垄断和市场势力[J];产业经济研究;2003年04期
5 曾勇红,权先璋,余波,季林奎;互联电力系统中发电市场势力刍议[J];华中电力;2003年02期
6 牟春艳;影响企业自身的市场势力的因素探析[J];理论界;2004年01期
7 郭海涛;;市场势力理论研究的新进展[J];经济评论;2006年03期
8 徐振宇;;跨国零售集团的市场势力:扩展与制衡[J];北京工商大学学报(社会科学版);2006年04期
9 张小蒂;朱勤;;论全球价值链中我国企业创新与市场势力构建的良性互动[J];中国工业经济;2007年05期
10 陈伟光;;银行垄断及其市场势力研究[J];国际经贸探索;2007年02期
相关会议论文 前2条
1 王丹萍;;基于双边谈判理论的零售商市场势力产生原因分析[A];首届中部地区商业经济论坛论文集[C];2007年
2 王丹萍;;零售商市场势力与纵向限制[A];首届中部地区商业经济论坛论文集[C];2007年
相关重要报纸文章 前7条
1 王明夫;正视市场势力的存在[N];证券时报;2004年
2 记者 张晶;在国际市场中我国企业的市场势力严重缺失[N];科技日报;2010年
3 中国社科院经济所研究员 詹小洪;朝鲜币改剑指“市场势力”[N];中国经营报;2009年
4 本报记者 陈挺 综合整理;产生垄断的原因[N];中国农机化报;2002年
5 农业部乡镇企业局副局长 卢永军;全面落实科学发展观 推进乡企产业集聚[N];中国乡镇企业报;2005年
6 王明夫;正视市场势力的存在[N];证券时报;2004年
7 本报记者 马强;网络时代最大挑战是知识产权[N];深圳商报;2000年
相关博士学位论文 前5条
1 连海霞;转轨条件下电信业竞争政策研究[D];山东大学;2015年
2 朱勤;国际竞争中企业市场势力与创新的互动研究[D];浙江大学;2007年
3 占明珍;市场势力研究[D];武汉大学;2011年
4 徐鸣哲;锰产业的市场结构与市场势力研究[D];东北财经大学;2011年
5 贾钰哲;企业家创新与市场势力提升研究[D];浙江大学;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 朱兴珍;平台厂商市场势力的获取、维持与中国银联的垄断、规制[D];山东大学;2015年
2 何柏元;中国纺织服装业国际市场势力测量及影响因素分析[D];武汉纺织大学;2015年
3 潘勇;产品市场势力、公司内部治理与盈余管理关系的研究[D];电子科技大学;2014年
4 单尧;大型B2C电子商务平台企业市场势力实证研究[D];浙江工商大学;2015年
5 彭t,
本文编号:2425369
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/gongyinglianguanli/2425369.html