当前位置:主页 > 管理论文 > 会展论文 >

宋明两代院体画的兴衰对现代工笔画复兴的启示

发布时间:2018-04-09 16:13

  本文选题:画院 切入点:宋代 出处:《天津大学》2011年博士论文


【摘要】:宋代和明代是中国宫廷画院历史上的发展活跃期。宋明两代存在许多共同点,例如,它们都是大一统的汉族政权,统治时间都是300年左右,思想基础都是儒家学说,均执行重文轻武的政策,等等。明代比宋代更具备时代的优势,在画院发展水平的比较中也应该占据优势,然而事实却恰恰相反。在前人的研究成果中大都是单个朝代画院研究,并没有对比研究。本文的目的就是通过对比研究宋明两代的画院制度和画家,找出宋明画院水平发展差异的原因,并研究其对现代工笔画发展的启示。 在宋明两代画院制度的对比中,本文分别对画院的体制、职官待遇和录取制度进行了研究。在对画家的对比中,分别对画家规模、画家来源和画家关系进行了研究。找到七条影响宋明画院水平差异的原因,属于外部因素的有:运行体制的因素、画家待遇因素、录取制度因素、皇帝态度因素;属于内部因素的有:画家规模因素、画家来源因素和画家态度因素。在两代画院的发展过程中,由于在这七方面的差异,导致了明代画院发展水平低于宋代的结果。 在对画家的研究中,本文使用了数据统计分析方法,找到了对宋明两代历朝皇帝对画院重视程度能够进行量化对比的方式。 本文认为导致宋明两代画院发展水平明弱宋强的因素对现代工笔画发展也具有重要的启示。通过以上研究总结出对现代工笔画持续发展的启示,包括对画家地位的认定、美术院校的综合化、画家职称评定的利弊和美术展览的导向;对画家的启示,包括画家的服务对象和画家的创作态度。
[Abstract]:Song Dynasty and Ming Dynasty were the active period of development in the history of Chinese court painting academy.Song Ming had a lot in common, for example, they were unified Han regime, ruling for about 300 years, the ideological basis is Confucianism, they all carry out the policy of attaching importance to literature rather than force, and so on.The Ming Dynasty had the advantage of the times more than the Song Dynasty, and it should also occupy the advantage in the comparison of the development level of the painting Academy, however, the fact is quite the opposite.In the previous research results are mostly a single dynasty painting school research, and there is no comparative study.The purpose of this paper is to find out the reasons for the difference in the level development of Song Ming painting institute and to study its enlightenment to the development of modern fine brushwork through the comparative study of Song Ming's two generations of painting school system and painters.In the comparison of Song Ming's two generations of painting school system, this paper studies the system of painting school, the treatment of official and the admission system respectively.In the contrast of painters, the scale of painters, the origin of painters and the relationship between painters are studied.To find out the reasons for the difference in the quality of Song Ming's painting institute, the external factors are: the operating system, the painter's treatment, the admission system, the emperor's attitude, and the internal factors: the painter's scale.Painter source factor and painter attitude factor.In the course of the development of the two generations, due to the differences in these seven aspects, the development level of the painting academy in the Ming Dynasty was lower than that in the Song Dynasty.In the study of painters, this paper uses the method of statistical analysis to find a way to quantify and compare the importance attached to the painting academy by the emperors of the two dynasties of Song Ming.This paper holds that the factors leading to the development level of Song Ming's two generation painting schools are also of great significance to the development of modern fine brushwork.Through the above studies summarized the inspiration to the sustainable development of modern fine brushwork, including the recognition of the status of the painter, the integration of art colleges, the pros and cons of the artist's professional title evaluation and the guidance of the art exhibition; the inspiration to the painter,Including the painter's service object and artist's creative attitude.
【学位授予单位】:天津大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:J209.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 单国强;林良、吕纪生平考略[J];故宫博物院院刊;1997年01期

2 单国强;二十世纪对明代“浙派”的研究[J];故宫博物院院刊;2001年03期

3 畏冬;隋唐宫廷绘画机构概述[J];故宫博物院院刊;2004年03期

4 余辉;南宋宫廷绘画中的“谍画”之谜[J];故宫博物院院刊;2004年03期

5 伊沛霞;宫廷收藏对宫廷绘画的影响:宋徽宗的个案研究[J];故宫博物院院刊;2004年03期

6 彭慧萍;两宋宫廷书画储藏制度之变:以秘阁为核心的鉴藏机制研究[J];故宫博物院院刊;2005年01期

7 聂卉;;明代宫廷画家职官状况述略[J];故宫博物院院刊;2007年02期

8 刘坤太;宋朝添差官制度初探[J];河南大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1984年04期

9 程民生;北宋探事机构—皇城司[J];河南大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1984年04期

10 余辉;南宋画院佚史杂考二题[J];美术观察;1996年09期

相关博士学位论文 前10条

1 顾平;皇家赞助与文化认同[D];南京艺术学院;2002年

2 彭慧萍;“南宋画院”之省舍职制与画史想象[D];中央美术学院;2005年

3 张完硕;宋代画论美学研究[D];武汉大学;2004年

4 张白露;郭熙研究[D];东南大学;2006年

5 韩刚;北宋翰林图画院制度渊源考论[D];中央美术学院;2007年

6 张其凤;宋徽宗对文人画的影响[D];南京艺术学院;2007年

7 耿明松;明代绘画史学研究[D];清华大学;2008年

8 王严;“宣和体”及北宋宫廷花鸟画与诗的相关性研究[D];中央美术学院;2009年

9 孔涛;北宋院体、文人和禅画研究[D];山东大学;2009年

10 蔡英余;南宋工笔花鸟画研究[D];中国美术学院;2010年



本文编号:1727178

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/huizhanguanlilunwen/1727178.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户db7be***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com