论建筑作品著作权侵权的认定

发布时间：2018-04-28 23:09

本文选题：建筑作品 + 侵权行为　；参考：《大连海事大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：建筑被喻为凝固的音乐,而音乐被喻为流动的建筑。随着建筑业的发展,建筑作品的保护不仅是众多业内人士关注的焦点,而且亦关系到我们广大业主的切身利益。尽管我国将建筑作品单列为著作权法保护的一类客体,但规定仍较为粗糙,可操作性不强,因此对其相关理论与法律实践还有许多需要深入研究的地方。本文从建筑作品著作权的相关理论出发,重点对几种主要的建筑作品侵权行为的认定进行讨论：第一部分,建筑作品的基本理论。首先对建筑作品的概念进行梳理,并将其分别与建筑物、美术作品进行辨析。其次,在参照国际上对建筑作品保护范畴的相关规定,并比较了建筑作品的各种表现形式间的关联之后,将建筑作品保护的范围确定为建筑物、建筑设计图与建筑模型。最后,对建筑作品的权利主体进行分析,并明确了保护建筑作品著作权的意义。第二部分,建筑作品侵权行为的表现、特征、分类及构成要件。首先引用几则案例说明当下建筑作品侵权行为的表现形式多样化、复杂化；其次结合著作权法的基本原理,对建筑作品侵权行为的特征与分类进行讨论；明确侵权行为的构成要件：即未经许可实施了受建筑作品专有权控制的行为且没有法定的免责事由。第三部分,建筑作品侵权行为的具体认定。首先讨论了建筑作品的独创性判断,这是认定侵权不可或缺的一环,其判断结果直接影响着建筑作品侵权行为的认定。然后针对主要的侵犯建筑作品专有权的行为予以分别论述：复制是对建筑作品侵权的主要方式,复制的方式应该包括立体与平面之间的复制,同时对复制、剽窃、抄袭、临摹进行了辨别,这些都是认定复制侵权必须要解决的问题；侵犯发行权的行为主要表现在宣传手段上,对其的认定主要取决于发行目的与权利人许可；而侵犯展览权、改编权以及一些人身权行为的认定也各有其特殊之处,但是无论多么复杂的侵权行为,都是以侵权行为的构成为基础进行认定的。
[Abstract]:Architecture is described as solidified music, and music is described as flowing architecture. With the development of construction industry, the protection of architectural works is not only the focus of attention, but also related to the immediate interests of our owners. Although the construction works are listed as a kind of object protected by copyright law in our country, the regulations are still relatively rough and the operability is not strong. Therefore, there are still many aspects that need to be deeply studied in the relevant theory and legal practice. Based on the theory of the copyright of architectural works, this paper focuses on the identification of several major infringing acts of architectural works. The first part is the basic theory of architectural works. First of all, the concept of architectural works is combed, and it is distinguished from buildings and art works. Secondly, the scope of protection of architectural works is defined as buildings, architectural design drawings and architectural models after comparing the relationships between various forms of expression of architectural works, referring to the relevant provisions of the international protection category of architectural works. Finally, the author analyzes the subject of the right of architectural works, and clarifies the significance of protecting the copyright of architectural works. The second part, the expression, the characteristic, the classification and the constituent elements of the tort of the architectural works. Firstly, several cases are cited to illustrate the diversity and complexity of the current tort of architectural works; secondly, the characteristics and classification of the infringing acts of architectural works are discussed in combination with the basic principles of copyright law. It is clear that the constitution of the tort is that the act controlled by the exclusive right of the building work has been carried out without permission and there is no statutory exemption. The third part, the concrete confirmation of the tort of construction works. Firstly, the author discusses the originality judgment of architectural works, which is an indispensable link in the determination of tort, and the result of judgment directly affects the identification of infringing acts of architectural works. Then the main acts of infringing the exclusive rights of architectural works are discussed separately: reproduction is the main way of infringing architectural works, the way of reproduction should include the reproduction between three-dimensional and plane, at the same time, copying, plagiarism, plagiarism, plagiarism, plagiarism, plagiarism, and plagiarism. Copy has been identified, these are the problems that must be solved in the determination of copyright infringement; the act of infringing the right of distribution is mainly manifested in the means of publicity, and the identification of the infringement mainly depends on the purpose of the issue and the permission of the right holder; and the infringement of the right of exhibition, The right of adaptation and the recognition of some personal rights have their own special features, but no matter how complex the tort, it is based on the constitution of the tort.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D923.41

【引证文献】