公安机关冻结止付银行承兑汇票问题的案例分析

发布时间：2018-02-02 03:00

本文关键词： 公安机关冻结银行承兑汇票　出处：《兰州大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本文通过案例的分析,针对其中引发了六个争议性法律问题：一是公安机关能否冻结银行承兑汇票?二是银行能否协助公安机关冻结止付银行承兑汇票?三是银行承兑汇票被公安机关冻结止付后,银行能否拒绝持票人承兑银行承兑汇票?四是银行在公安机关解除银行承兑汇票冻结后,是否有及时告知持票人的义务?五是持票人的银行承兑汇票被公安机关冻结止付后,将采取什么措施维护自己的合法权利?六是公安部门冻结银行承兑汇票和法院冻结银行承兑汇票的区别?通过对这六个问题的分析,阐述了作者的观点。在此基础上,提出了八条建议,一是建议扩大法律、法规、司法解释中关于公安机关冻结银行承兑汇票等票据的范围；二是建议银行在进行程序审查时,有权拒绝公安机关等有关部门的违规冻结行为；三是建议银行和公安机关就拒绝承兑银行承兑汇票责任问题承担协商达成协议；四是银行在公安机关解除银行承兑汇票冻结后,有及时告知持票人的承兑义务；五是持票人对公安机关违法冻结行为,建议可以和银行联手向同级人民检察院申诉、同级人大常委会申诉、同级的公安部门或上级公安部门申诉；六是公安机关通过合法程序冻结了银行承兑汇票后,有及时告知义务；七是公安机关内部法制部门做好把关和监督工作；八是法院在受理持票人起诉银行的案件中,不同的法院有不同的判决,以后,各地法院应该统一标准,有利于维护法律的尊严。
[Abstract]:This article through the case analysis, has caused six controversial legal questions: first, whether the public security organ can freeze the bank acceptance bill? Second, can banks help public security organs freeze bank acceptance bills? Third, after the bank acceptance bill is frozen by the public security organs to stop payment, can the bank refuse to accept the bank acceptance bill? Fourth, is it the obligation of the bank to inform the holder of the bill in time after the public security organ removes the freezing of the bank acceptance bill? Fifth, after the holder's bank acceptance bill is frozen by the public security organs to stop payment, what measures will be taken to safeguard his legal rights? Six is the difference between freezing bank acceptance draft by public security department and freezing bank acceptance bill by court? Through the analysis of these six issues, this paper expounds the author's views. On this basis, it puts forward eight suggestions, one is to propose the expansion of laws and regulations. In judicial interpretation, the scope of public security organs freezing bank acceptance bills and other instruments; Second, it is suggested that banks should have the right to refuse the illegal freezing of public security organs and other relevant departments when carrying out the procedure examination; Third, it is suggested that the bank and the public security organ should reach an agreement through consultation on the responsibility of refusing to accept the bill of exchange. Fourth, the bank has timely informed the holder of the acceptance obligation after the public security organ lifted the freezing of the bank acceptance bill; Fifth, the holder of the ticket against the illegal freezing of public security organs, suggest that they can join hands with the bank to appeal to the people's Procuratorate at the same level, the standing Committee of the people's Congress at the same level, the public security department at the same level or the public security department at the higher level. Sixthly, the public security organ has the obligation to inform the bank promptly after freezing the bank acceptance bill through the legal procedure; Seventh, the internal legal department of the public security organs should do a good job of supervision and supervision; Eighth, different courts have different judgments in accepting the cases of bearer suing the bank. After that, the local courts should unify the standards and help to safeguard the dignity of the law.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D922.1;F832.2

【参考文献】