当前位置:主页 > 管理论文 > 旅游管理论文 >

钦州无居民海岛旅游开发适宜性研究

发布时间:2018-07-16 21:09
【摘要】:随着我国从海洋大国向海洋强国的转变,海岛的开发急剧增加,并且海岛经济对GDP的贡献率也在不断地上升。无居民海岛因其独特性,在海岛开发过程中备受关注。钦州的无居民海岛群是距离北部湾城市群核心城市南宁最近的海岛群,合理、有序的对钦州无居民海岛进行旅游开发提上日程。基于此,本文开展钦州市无居民海岛旅游开发适宜性评价研究,旨在保护该国家级城市群生态环境、提升居住生活环境、提高休闲旅游的品味。本文主要采用现场勘查、问卷统计与统计分析相结合的方法,综合分析法与系统分析法,数学模型法(模糊决策模型)以及SWOT分析法,在充分了解国内外研究进展的前提下,首先对钦州无居民海岛旅游开发现状和潜力进行SWOT分析;其次,在充分调研钦州无居民海岛基本情况的基础上,运用层次分析法和德尔菲法(专家评价法),构建钦州无居民海岛开发模式模糊决策模型,并选取了独山背岛、擦人墩、虎墩、旱泾长岭、小墩、樟木环岛、小娥眉岭、抄墩岛共8个未开发无居民海岛为例,提出适合的开发模式和开发建议;然后选择经济方面、社会文化方面和生态环境方面的指标,对钦州无居民海岛旅游开发适宜性进行定性评价,并针对钦州无居民海岛开发的现状和规划,即主要能源与资源、废弃物处理等方面对生态足迹模型进行改进和优化,构建了适合钦州无居民海岛开发的生态承载力计算模型,并以钦州市七十二泾为例,计算并分析了该无居民海岛群的旅游生态承载力;最后,提出钦州无居民海岛旅游可持续开发的对策和建议。本文主要的研究结果主要如下:1.本文在充分调研钦州无居民海岛基本情况的基础上,构建钦州无居民海岛开发模式模糊决策模型,研究结果表明,(1)最适宜观光游乐型海岛旅游开发模式的有4个,分别是独山背岛、樟木环岛、小娥眉岭和抄墩岛;(2)最适合休闲度假型海岛旅游开发模式的有樟木环岛、小娥眉岭和擦人墩;(3)最适宜运动娱乐型海岛旅游开发模式的有3个,分别是虎墩、旱泾长岭和小墩;(4)最适合生态保护型海岛旅游开发模式的为擦人墩。2.本文对生态足迹模型加以改进,构建了适合钦州无居民海岛开发的生态承载力的计算模型,并以钦州的七十二径为例,研究结果表明,七十二径旅游景区建成以后,餐饮生态足迹为3500hm2、住宿生态足迹为506.21hm2、交通生态足迹为116.69hm2、休闲娱乐生态足迹为3.10hm2、游览观光生态足迹为318.03hm2、购物生态足迹为875hm2,总的生态足迹为5319.03hm2,而生态供给仅为788.56hm2,生态赤字达到4530.47hm2。3.钦州开发无居民海岛具有明显优势,且机遇难得,但存在一定的生态压力,因此建议如下:(1)全面实施《钦州市“江、海、湖、岛”旅游发展规划》、《钦州市七十二泾海岛群区域用岛规划》;(2)加强旅游基础设施和公共服务体系建设;(3)凸显资源优势和产业地位;(4)突出改革创新,完善体制机制;(5)规范市场环境秩序;(6)依托无居民海岛旅游开发,加快钦州全域旅游建设。
[Abstract]:With the transition from the big ocean power to the ocean power, the development of the island has increased rapidly, and the contribution rate of the island economy to the GDP is also rising. The uninhabited island has attracted much attention in the development process of the island because of its uniqueness. The uninhabited island group in Qinzhou is the nearest island group from the core city of the Beibu Gulf city group, Nanning. In order to protect the ecological environment of the national urban agglomeration, improve the living environment and improve the taste of leisure tourism, this paper mainly adopts field investigation, questionnaire statistics and unification. The integrated analysis method, system analysis method, mathematical model method (fuzzy decision model) and SWOT analysis method are used to analyze the development status and potential of Qinzhou uninhabited island tourism by SWOT analysis. Secondly, the basic situation of Qinzhou uninhabited island is fully investigated. On the basis of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and Delphy method (expert evaluation method), the fuzzy decision-making model of Qinzhou uninhabited island development model is constructed, and the 8 undeveloped Island undeveloped islands, such as Dushan back Island, mound pier, tiger pier, xerjing Changling, small pier, camphor ring Island, small er Mei Ling and piers Island, are taken as an example, and the suitable development model and development proposal are put forward. And then choose the economic, social, cultural and ecological environment indicators to make a qualitative evaluation on the suitability of Qinzhou uninhabited island tourism development, and improve and optimize the ecological footprint model in terms of the status and planning of Qinzhou uninhabited island development, that is, the main energy and resources, waste disposal and so on. According to the ecological carrying capacity calculation model of Qinzhou uninhabited island development, and taking the seventy-two Jing of Qinzhou as an example, the tourism ecological carrying capacity of the uninhabited island group is calculated and analyzed. Finally, the countermeasures and suggestions for sustainable development of Qinzhou uninhabited island tourism are put forward. The main results of this paper are as follows: 1. this article is fully investigated in the Qin Dynasty On the basis of the basic situation of the uninhabited island in the state, the fuzzy decision model of Qinzhou uninhabited island development model is constructed. The results show that (1) there are 4 most suitable tourism development models for sightseeing tour islands, namely, Dushan back Island, camphor wood ring Island, small Er Mei Ling and piers Island, and (2) the most suitable for leisure island tourism development model. Camphor ring Island, small Er Mei Ling mountain and mound mound; (3) there are 3 modes of tourism development for the most suitable sport and entertainment Island, respectively, tiger piers, Changling and small piers, respectively. (4) the most suitable for ecological protection island tourism development model for the ecological footprint model, the ecological footprint model is improved, and the ecological environment suitable for the development of uninhabited island in Qinzhou is constructed. The calculation model of carrying capacity is taken as an example of the seventy-two path of Qinzhou. The results show that the ecological footprint of the food and beverage is 3500hm2, the ecological footprint of accommodation is 506.21hm2, the ecological footprint is 116.69hm2, the ecological footprint of leisure entertainment is 3.10hm2, the ecological footprint of sightseeing and sightseeing is 318.03hm2, and the ecological footprint of the shopping is as a footmark. 875hm2, the total ecological footprint is 5319.03hm2, and the ecological supply is only 788.56hm2, the ecological deficit reaches 4530.47hm2.3. Qinzhou development free Island Island has obvious advantages, and the opportunity is rare, but there is a certain ecological pressure. Therefore, the following suggestions are as follows: (1) the comprehensive implementation of the "Qinzhou, the sea, lake, island" tourism development planning >, < Qinzhou City seventy-two Jing Hai Island Group Regional Island planning >; (2) strengthen the construction of tourism infrastructure and public service system; (3) highlight the resource advantages and industrial status; (4) highlight the reform and innovation, improve the institutional mechanism; (5) standardize the market environment order; (6) relying on the development of non resident island tourism, to speed up the construction of the whole region of Qinzhou tourism.
【学位授予单位】:广西大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F592.7

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 李俊峰;聂朝俊;;基于生态足迹模型的贵州省森林公园旅游可持续发展研究[J];山地农业生物学报;2016年03期

2 杨亦民;徐静;;基于旅游生态足迹模型的张家界旅游可持续发展研究[J];中南林业科技大学学报;2016年06期

3 汤和银;王维;;坚持问题导向 发展全域旅游[J];今日海南;2016年04期

4 孙元敏;朱嘉;黄海萍;;湄洲岛旅游可持续发展的生态足迹分析研究[J];生态科学;2015年06期

5 戴培杰;杨丽华;董楠楠;;宁波无居民海岛保护性开发模式探析[J];特区经济;2015年05期

6 朱正涛;谷东起;陈勇;杨玉江;王勇智;闫文文;;青岛市无居民海岛旅游开发适宜性分级评价[J];海洋开发与管理;2015年03期

7 袁仲杰;高范;孙岳;钟慧颖;;基于生态足迹模型沿海旅游资源开发规模评估——以大连旅顺口区为例[J];海洋开发与管理;2015年02期

8 涂振顺;杨顺良;;无居民海岛生态承载力评价方法构建[J];海洋开发与管理;2014年10期

9 王鹏;况福民;邓育武;田亚平;陈春秀;;基于旅游生态足迹模型的旅游地生态安全评价——以南岳衡山为例[J];衡阳师范学院学报;2014年03期

10 马得懿;;无居民海岛使用权阐释:海洋属性与海权发展[J];河北法学;2014年07期

相关会议论文 前1条

1 王晶;赵锦霞;刘大海;吴桑云;;基于生态足迹的海岛旅游承载力模型及祥云岛实证分析[A];2010年海岛可持续发展论坛论文集[C];2010年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 杨晓s,

本文编号:2127675


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/lvyoujiudianguanlilunwen/2127675.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户226fd***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com