创新能力对我国体育用品企业竞争力影响的实证研究

发布时间：2018-05-16 17:27

本文选题：体育用品企业 + 创新能力　；参考：《北京师范大学学报(自然科学版)》2015年04期

【摘要】：在梳理体育产业领域关于企业创新能力和竞争力文献的基础上,提出创新能力对体育用品企业竞争力的影响机制,进而构建我国体育用品企业竞争力评价指标体系.采集我国13家体育用品企业上市公司连续5年的数据,采用主成分分析法,并根据成分得分系数矩阵表转化为函数表达形式,计算出企业竞争力综合得分.最后,以体育用品企业竞争力为被解释变量,以营销投入比率、研发投入比率、人均科研投入、人均盈利能力、专利拥有数、研发投入增长率为解释变量,以企业规模为控制变量,构建多元线性回归模型,实证分析创新能力对我国体育用品企业竞争力的影响.研究结果表明:(1)体育用品企业竞争力综合得分较低,361度(F=0.344 0)、安踏体育(F=0.243 3)和中国动向(F=0.241 6)的企业竞争力得分位列前三名,企业竞争力得分最后三名分别为信隆实业(F=0.0231)、裕元集团(F=0.0005)和泰亚股份(F=-0.034 4);(2)体育用品企业营销投入比率(B=-0.027,Sig=0.5530.05)、人均科研投入(B=-0.178,Sig=0.1610.05)、专利拥有数(B=-0.045,Sig=0.4300.05)与企业竞争力呈负相关,但关系不显著;(3)体育用品企业研发投入比率(B=0.035,Sig=0.6400.05)和人均盈利能力(B=0.166,Sig=0.0830.05)与企业竞争力呈正相关关系,但关系不显著;(4)体育用品企业研发投入增长率(B=0.193,Sig=0.0010.01)与企业竞争力呈非常显著的正相关关系.
[Abstract]:On the basis of combing the literature on the innovation ability and competitiveness of enterprises in the field of sports industry, this paper puts forward the influence mechanism of innovation ability on the competitiveness of sports goods enterprises, and then constructs the evaluation index system of the competitiveness of sports goods enterprises in China. The data of 13 listed sporting goods companies in China were collected for 5 consecutive years. Principal component Analysis (PCA) was used to calculate the comprehensive scores of enterprises' competitiveness according to the matrix of component score coefficient. Finally, taking the competitiveness of sporting goods enterprises as the explained variables, the ratio of marketing investment, R & D investment, per capita scientific research investment, per capita profitability, patent ownership, and R & D investment growth rate as explanatory variables, Taking the enterprise scale as the control variable, this paper constructs a multivariate linear regression model, and empirically analyzes the influence of innovation ability on the competitiveness of sports goods enterprises in China. The results show that: (1) the overall score of competitive ability of sports goods enterprises is lower than 361 degrees, and that of Anta sports enterprise is 0.243 3) and that of China trend is 0.241 6) the score of enterprise competitiveness is in the top three places. The last three places in the competitive power of enterprises are Xinlong Industrial Group (FN) 0.0231, Yuyuan Group (FU 0.0005) and Taiya Stock Company (FU -0.034 4). The ratio of marketing investment in sporting goods enterprises is 0.5530.05), the per capita investment in scientific research is B-0.178 Sig0.1610.05, and the patent ownership is negative correlation with the competitiveness of enterprises. However, the relationship between R & D investment ratio of sporting goods enterprises was not significant (P < 0.05), and the ratio of R & D investment of sportswear enterprises was 0.035% Sign 0.6400.05) and the per capita profitability were 0.166 Sign 0.0830.05) there was a positive correlation between R & D investment ratio of sports goods enterprises and the competitiveness of enterprises. But the relationship is not significant (4) the growth rate of R & D input of sporting goods enterprises is 0.193 Sign 0.0010.01) there is a very significant positive correlation between R & D input and competitiveness.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学体育与运动学院;河北大学体育教研部;中国科学院大学;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金教育学青年课题(CLA130195)
【分类号】：G80-05

【参考文献】