基于经费收支视角的智库组织治理:中美比较

发布时间：2018-05-06 00:43

本文选题：智库 + 经费　；参考：《中国软科学》2016年11期

【摘要】：文章以经费收支为切入点分析了中美智库的组织治理机制。分析指出,美国主流智库的政策研究质量及政策影响力都遥遥领先于中国同行,这种差异是不同组织治理结构的产物。美国智库大多由社会创办并依赖于社会捐赠,在这种模式下,出资者参与、信息披露与税务监管形成智库的外部压力,而以研究和人力资本为核心的资金分配形成智库的内部激励,两种力量共同作用于智库,使之高效运作。相反,大部分中国智库的主体资金来自政府的财政拨款,出资者监管动力缺失、法律制度不完善以及信息不对称等问题阻碍了外部力量发挥作用。另一方面,智库的资金配置缺乏灵活性,并且忽视了对智力劳动的补偿,致使内部激励弱化。文章最后对新型智库建设提出了一些方向性的政策建议。
[Abstract]:This paper analyzes the organizational governance mechanism of Sino-American think tanks from the point of view of expenditure. It is pointed out that the policy research quality and policy influence of American mainstream think tanks are far ahead of those of their Chinese counterparts, and this difference is the product of different organizational governance structures. Most of the American think tanks are founded by the society and depend on social donations. Under this model, the investors participate, information disclosure and tax regulation form external pressure on the think-tanks. The internal incentive of the think-tank is formed by the fund allocation with research and human capital as the core, and the two forces act together on the think-tank to make it operate efficiently. On the contrary, most of the main funds of Chinese think-tanks come from the government's financial allocation, the lack of regulatory motivation of the investors, the imperfect legal system and the asymmetric information, etc., which hinder the external forces from playing their role. On the other hand, the lack of flexibility in the allocation of funds, and neglect of intellectual labor compensation, resulting in the weakening of internal incentives. Finally, the paper puts forward some policy suggestions for the construction of new-type think-tank.
【作者单位】：华南理工大学公共政策研究院;集美大学工商管理学院;
【基金】：教育部重大攻关项目“决策咨询制度与中国特色新型智库建设研究”(14JZD023)
【分类号】：C932

【相似文献】