重大行政决策中的听证制度研究

发布时间：2018-03-13 15:18

本文选题：重大行政决策　切入点：听证制度　出处：《苏州大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：重大行政决策具有全局性、长期性和综合性等特点,能够对广泛的、不特定的决策相对人的实质性利益产生重大影响。一旦决策失误,广大人民群众的合法权益会受到严重侵害,社会经济发展也会遭到不可挽回的损失。重大行政决策听证程序为公民、社团、企业、政府等多方主体表达意见、交换信息提供了一个平台,对提升决策的民主性、合法性和科学性,避免决策失误有着重要的作用。但行政决策听证制度毕竟属于舶来品,在我国还处于发展的初始阶段,立法上听证规则不够完善,实践中听证程序的功能也没有得到充分发挥,听证制度需要逐渐发展和完善。本文中,笔者对我国行政决策听证规范和实践进行了较为深入的分析和探讨,在此基础上对决策听证程序的完善进行了一些思考并提出建议。本文共分为引言、正文及结语三大部分。其中,引言部分主要论述的是选题的意义、我国重大行政决策听证存在的问题和本文所使用的研究方法。结语部分对全文进行了总结。正文部分共分为四章:第一章,重大行政决策听证程序概述。先通过阐述行政决策的概念和特征、界定重大行政决策的范围来明确重大行政决策的内涵;继而介绍了听证制度的发展与概念,再结合前文重大行政决策的内涵对重大行政决策听证进行了定义和特征描述。第二章,重大行政决策听证的法理分析。首先阐述重大行政决策听证制度的理论基础,包括人民主权理论和公共治理理论;其次,阐述重大行政决策听证制度的现实意义,包括:提高决策的合法性、合理性和科学性;提升行政决策透明度,遏制腐败;有利于社会和谐、稳定。第三章,我国重大行政决策听证程序现状评析。本章分为两部分,第一部分对我国重大行政决策听证程序立法概况进行综述,第二部分对我国重大行政决策听证程序规范与实践进行评析。通过以上分析,发现我国重大行政决策听证程序在规范和实践中存在的不足。第四章,完善我国重大行政决策听证制度的思考。这一章是全文的重点,分为六个部分,分别对建立统一的决策听证程序规范、扩大决策听证程序的适用范围、完善决策听证主持人制度、优化决策听证代表的选择机制、提高决策听证的透明度、确定听证笔录的效力和构建意见反馈机制提出思考建议。
[Abstract]:Major administrative decisions have the characteristics of overall, long-term and comprehensive, which can have a significant impact on the substantive interests of relative parties in a wide and non-specific decision. The legitimate rights and interests of the broad masses of the people will be seriously infringed upon, and the social and economic development will also suffer irreparable losses. The major administrative decision hearing procedure is for citizens, associations, enterprises, governments and other parties to express their opinions. The exchange of information provides a platform for enhancing the democracy, legitimacy and scientificalness of decision making and avoiding decision-making mistakes. However, the hearing system of administrative decision making is foreign after all, and it is still in the initial stage of development in our country. The hearing rules in legislation are not perfect, the function of hearing procedure is not fully developed in practice, and the hearing system needs to be developed and perfected gradually. The author makes a deep analysis and discussion on the standard and practice of administrative decision hearing in our country, on the basis of which some thoughts and suggestions are made on the perfection of the hearing procedure of decision making. The main body and conclusion of the three parts. Among them, the introduction mainly discusses the significance of the topic, The problems existing in the hearing of major administrative decisions in China and the research methods used in this paper. The conclusion part summarizes the full text. The text is divided into four chapters: chapter one, Brief introduction of hearing procedure of Major Administrative decision. First, define the scope of major administrative decision by expounding the concept and characteristics of administrative decision, then introduce the development and concept of hearing system. Combining the connotation of the previous major administrative decision making, the paper defines and describes the characteristics of the major administrative decision hearing. Chapter two, the legal theory analysis of the major administrative decision hearing. First, the theoretical basis of the major administrative decision hearing system is expounded. It includes the theory of people's sovereignty and the theory of public governance. Secondly, it expounds the practical significance of the hearing system of major administrative decision, including: improving the legitimacy, rationality and science of the decision, enhancing the transparency of the administrative decision, curbing corruption; This chapter is divided into two parts. The first part summarizes the legislative overview of the major administrative decision hearing procedure in China. The second part analyzes the procedure and practice of the major administrative decision hearing in China. Through the above analysis, we find out the deficiency of the hearing procedure of the major administrative decision in our country. Chapter 4th, This chapter is the focus of the full text, which is divided into six parts, respectively, to establish a unified decision-making hearing procedure norms, expand the scope of application of decision-making hearing procedures, Improve the system of decision hearing moderator, optimize the selection mechanism of decision hearing representatives, improve the transparency of the decision-making hearing, determine the effectiveness of the hearing record and construct the feedback mechanism.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D630

【参考文献】