谋利空间、分利秩序与违建现象的制度逻辑——基于中部地区M县的个案研究

发布时间：2018-03-28 04:19

本文选题：违建现象　切入点：制度激励　出处：《公共行政评论》2017年02期

【摘要】：论文构建起一个产权与治理相融合的理论分析框架,结合来自中部地区M县"三违"现象的案例分析,指出违建现象涌现是地权分割与基层治理能力弱化共同作用的结果。一方面,地权分割为灰色土地市场的兴起提供了制度空间,外部利润诱使着利益相关者持续地参与违建活动;另一方面,基层治理能力弱化为地利分配秩序固化创造了行为空间,地方性"谋地精英"控制着违建利益的分配秩序。研究还表明,地权单元和治理单元的不对称是违建现象发生的制度根源,且地权单元和治理单元交互地发挥着作用,这个综合的制度互动系统塑造了违建活动的多元空间。因此,应当重构地权单元与基层治理单元间的关系,正视城市化对集体地权秩序造成的冲击,以促进地权渐进式发展与治理变迁的良性互动来化解违建治理困境。
[Abstract]:This paper constructs a theoretical analysis framework of property rights and governance, and combines the case study of "three violations" from M County in the central region. It is pointed out that the emergence of illegal construction is the result of the joint action of the division of land rights and the weakening of the basic management ability. On the one hand, the division of land rights provides the institutional space for the rise of the grey land market. External profits induce stakeholders to continue to participate in illegal construction activities; on the other hand, the weak governance capacity of the grassroots creates behavior space by solidifying the distribution order. The local "land elite" controls the distribution order of illegal building benefits. The study also shows that the asymmetry of land ownership unit and governance unit is the institutional root of illegal building phenomenon, and land ownership unit and governance unit play an interactive role. Therefore, the relationship between land ownership unit and grass-roots governance unit should be reconstructed, and the impact of urbanization on collective land ownership order should be faced squarely. In order to promote the gradual development of land rights and governance changes of benign interaction to resolve the plight of illegal building governance.
【作者单位】：中南财经政法大学公共管理学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社科基金青年项目“农村土地股份制运行效果与利益共享机制研究”(16YJC630154)
【分类号】：D630

【相似文献】