当前位置:主页 > 管理论文 > 行政管理论文 >

上海市闵行区政策评估制度构建研究

发布时间:2018-05-05 21:30

  本文选题:政策评估 + 制度构建 ; 参考:《上海师范大学》2015年硕士论文


【摘要】:政策评估在整个公共政策过程中起着重要的作用。政策评估作为一种对公共政策的效益、效率和价值进行综合判断与评价的政治行为,不仅是考量政策延续、改进和终止的重要依据,而且还决定着政府部门的工作质量和价值导向,并最终影响着公共资源的优化配置方向和公共部门的良好社会形象。因此,政策评估的重要性不容忽视。从政策评估的重要性和西方政策评估的发展来看,政策评估的作用要得到充分发挥需要有制度作为保障。基于政策评估系统构成的要素、“四代政策评估理论”以及西方发达国家建立政策评估制度的经验,本文认为政策评估制度应包括以下几个方面:明确设立独立的政策评估管理机构,明确多元的政策评估主体,明晰政策评估范围,建立具有指导意义的政策评估指标体系,规范政策评估程序等。上海市闵行区于2012年出台了《关于推行公共政策评估的实施办法(试行)》,该《办法》构建包括了评估组织、政策评估程序规范、政策评估指标体系等要素在内的政策评估制度。上海市闵行区政策评估作为我国地方政府政策评估制度构建较为典型的案例,对于我国地方政府建立政策评估制度、推进我国政策评估工作有着重要的意义。因此,本文以上海市闵行区政策评估为案例,分析了政策评估制度的构建及运行情况,并指出其在政策评估制度构建中工作中存在的不足以及值得推广和借鉴的做法。通过对该案例的研究分析,本文认为,完善闵行区的政策评估制度,需要有相关的法律法规作为保障,加强该项工作的权威性;要建立独立的、专业的政策评估机构,以保证政策评估工作的独立性和科学性;注重发展非政府的第三方评估机构,力求政策评估主体多元化,以保证政策评估的客观性与公正性;着力推动政策中期与后期评估;积极构建科学、规范的政策评估理论与方法,以适应我国的政策评估实践。
[Abstract]:Policy evaluation plays an important role in the whole process of public policy. Policy assessment, as a kind of political behavior that synthetically judges and evaluates the effectiveness, efficiency and value of public policies, is not only an important basis for considering the continuation, improvement and termination of policies. It also determines the work quality and value orientation of government departments, and ultimately affects the direction of the optimal allocation of public resources and the good social image of the public sector. Therefore, the importance of policy evaluation can not be ignored. From the view of the importance of policy evaluation and the development of western policy evaluation, the role of policy evaluation needs to be guaranteed by system if it is to be brought into full play. Based on the elements of the policy assessment system, the "four-generation policy evaluation theory" and the experience of the western developed countries in establishing the policy evaluation system, This paper holds that the policy evaluation system should include the following aspects: the establishment of an independent policy evaluation management body, a clear and pluralistic policy evaluation body, a clear policy evaluation scope, and a guiding policy evaluation index system. Standardize policy evaluation procedures, etc. In 2012, Minhang District of Shanghai issued "implementation measures on implementing Public Policy Evaluation (trial)", which constructed a policy evaluation system including evaluation organization, policy evaluation procedure, policy evaluation index system and so on. The policy evaluation of Minhang District in Shanghai is a typical case of the policy evaluation system of local government in our country. It is of great significance for the establishment of policy evaluation system and the promotion of policy evaluation in our country. Therefore, taking the policy evaluation of Minhang District in Shanghai as an example, this paper analyzes the construction and operation of the policy evaluation system, and points out its shortcomings in the construction of the policy evaluation system, as well as the practice that is worth popularizing and drawing lessons from. Through the study and analysis of this case, this paper holds that to perfect the policy evaluation system of Minhang District, we need to have relevant laws and regulations as the guarantee, strengthen the authority of this work, and establish independent and professional policy evaluation institutions. In order to ensure the independence and scientific nature of the policy evaluation work, pay attention to the development of non-governmental third-party evaluation institutions, strive to diversify the main body of policy evaluation to ensure the objectivity and impartiality of policy evaluation, and focus on the promotion of policy evaluation in the medium and late stages. To construct scientific and standardized theory and method of policy evaluation in order to adapt to the practice of policy evaluation in China.
【学位授予单位】:上海师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D630

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前9条

1 范柏乃;程宏伟;张莉;;韩国政府绩效评估及其对中国的借鉴意义[J];公共管理学报;2006年02期

2 周建国;;政策评估中独立第三方的逻辑、困境与出路[J];江海学刊;2009年06期

3 高雪莲;;政策评价方法论的研究进展及其争论[J];理论探讨;2009年05期

4 肖远军,李春玲;政策评价概念探析[J];理论探讨;1995年02期

5 陈世香;王笑含;;中国公共政策评估:回顾与展望[J];理论月刊;2009年09期

6 高富锋;公共政策评估主体的缺陷及对策分析[J];求实;2004年S4期

7 吴建南,温挺挺;政府绩效立法分析:以美国《政府绩效与结果法案》为例[J];中国行政管理;2004年09期

8 中国行政管理学会课题组;贾凌民;;政府公共政策绩效评估研究[J];中国行政管理;2013年03期

9 王礼鑫;;我国公共政策评估制度的构建——基于闵行经验的思考[J];行政论坛;2015年04期

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 李志军 国务院发展研究中心技术经济研究部;[N];中国经济时报;2013年

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 董幼鸿;我国地方政府政策评估制度化建设研究[D];华东师范大学;2008年



本文编号:1849369

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/zhengwuguanli/1849369.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户047f3***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com