派系政治与农民上访的逻辑

发布时间：2018-05-07 20:12

本文选题：利益 + 派系　；参考：《思想战线》2017年02期

【摘要】：派系竞争导致派系上访的生成,而派系上访具有弱组织性、求援性、非政治性、目标的人格化和参与者的两面性等特征。与那些"为权利而斗争"的农民上访行为不同,派系上访的目的是"为利益而斗争"。派系上访虽然在一定程度上有利于监督村治精英,维系村庄内部权力均衡,但也容易导致村政混乱和村庄公共性缺失,增加基层治理成本,耗费国家治理资源。在学理层面,基于村庄派系政治的视角理解农民上访行为逻辑,有利于进一步拓展农民抗争问题的研究视野。在政策层面,这一研究视角有助于决策部门更为清晰地认识农民上访行为的深层根源。为有效治理派系上访,国家需要进一步完善农村公共资源分配机制,加强基层民主制度建设,培育理性、协商的公民文化。
[Abstract]:Factional competition leads to the formation of factional petition, which is characterized by weak organization, appeal for help, non-political nature, personalization of target and dual character of participants. Unlike farmers who "fight for rights", factional petitions are aimed at "fighting for the good". Although factional petition helps to supervise the village elites and maintain the balance of power in the village to a certain extent, it also easily leads to the chaos of the village government and the lack of public nature of the village, increases the cost of grass-roots governance, and consumes the resources of national governance. On the theoretical level, understanding the logic of peasants' petition behavior from the perspective of village factional politics is beneficial to further expand the research field of peasants' protest. At the policy level, this research angle is helpful for the decision-making department to understand the deep root of farmers' petition behavior more clearly. In order to effectively manage faction petition, the country needs to further improve the mechanism of rural public resource allocation, strengthen the construction of grass-roots democratic system, and foster a rational and negotiated citizen culture.
【作者单位】：重庆大学新闻学院;西南政法大学政治与公共管理学院;
【基金】：中央高校基本科研业务费项目阶段性成果(2016CDJSK) 重庆市社会科学基金项目“法治化背景下创新基层信访工作模式研究”阶段性成果(2015YBZZ021)
【分类号】：D63;D422.6

【相似文献】