多中心治理视角下的邻避冲突治理研究

发布时间：2018-05-24 17:12

本文选题：多中心治理 + 邻避冲突　；参考：《湖南大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：近年来我国城市化进程不断加快,城市规模急剧扩大,政府不断兴建各类公共设施以满足居民需求。同时,我国公民的法制意识也不断增强,越来越注重维护自身权益。某些公共设施虽然能提高公众的生活质量,但因其具有负外部性而遭到设施周边群众极力反对甚至抗争,国外学者将这种现象称为Not In My Back Yard(NIMBY),国内学者将其译为邻避冲突。由于邻避冲突涉及到多个利益主体,其成因又极其复杂,政府在应对邻避冲突时经常陷入困境。因此,从多中心治理理论的视角对邻避冲突这一社会问题进行深入系统的研究,就具有较强的理论意义和现实意义。本文以多中心治理理论为分析工具,结合广州番禺垃圾焚烧发电厂事件指出邻避冲突的爆发既损害了企业和公众的利益,又不利于政府和专家公信力的重塑,同时还对和谐社会的构建也会产生不利影响。由于缺乏多元主体合作互动机制,政府缺乏冲突防治机制,企业自我监管意识不强,第三部门发育不成熟,新闻媒体社会责任履行不力,专家深陷信任危机,公众政治参与能力不强,导致多中心治理邻避冲突困难重重。为了走出上述困境,本文对国内外多元主体治理邻避冲突的经验进行了梳理,对他们各自的先进做法进行了分析,并得出要科学规划邻避设施选址、保障公众的知情权与参与权以及通过补偿弥补邻避设施的负外部性等启示。最后,本文从多中心治理理论出发提出了多元主体共同治理邻避冲突的思路,即构建多元主体合作互动机制、政府建立健全冲突防治机制、企业增强自我监管意识、第三部门明确自身职能定位、新闻媒体切实履行社会责任、专家努力提升自身公信力、公众强化政治参与能力,通过六大主体的共同协作治理,构建起治理邻避冲突的防治体系。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the process of urbanization in China has been speeding up, the scale of cities has expanded rapidly, and the government has been building various kinds of public facilities to meet the needs of residents. At the same time, our citizens' awareness of the legal system is also increasing, more and more attention is paid to safeguarding their own rights and interests. Although some public facilities can improve the quality of life of the public, they are strongly opposed or even protested by the people around the facilities because of their negative externalities. Foreign scholars call this phenomenon Not In My Back Yardi NIMBYY, and domestic scholars translate it into neighboring countries to avoid conflicts. Because the conflict avoidance involves many stakeholders and the causes are very complicated, the government often falls into a dilemma in dealing with the conflict avoidance. Therefore, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to conduct a deep and systematic study on the social problem of conflict avoidance from the perspective of polycentric governance theory. Based on the theory of multi-center governance and the incident of Guangzhou Panyu garbage incineration power plant, this paper points out that the outbreak of neighboring conflicts not only damages the interests of enterprises and the public, but also is not conducive to rebuilding the credibility of the government and experts. At the same time, the construction of a harmonious society will also have a negative impact. Due to the lack of the interactive mechanism of cooperation among multiple subjects, the lack of conflict prevention mechanism by the government, the weak sense of self-regulation of enterprises, the immature development of the third sector, the weak implementation of the social responsibility of the news media, and the deep crisis of trust among experts, The ability of public political participation is not strong, leading to the conflict avoidance difficulties of polycentric governance. In order to get out of the above predicament, this paper combs the experience of the multiple subjects in the management of neighboring conflict, analyzes their respective advanced practices, and draws the conclusion that the location of adjacent avoidance facilities should be scientifically planned. To protect the public's right to know and participate, and to compensate for the negative externality of adjacent facilities through compensation. Finally, based on the theory of multi-center governance, this paper puts forward the idea of co-governance of multi-subjects to avoid conflicts, that is, to construct the interactive mechanism of cooperation between multi-subjects, to establish and improve the mechanism of conflict prevention and control, and to enhance the awareness of self-supervision of enterprises. The third part defines its own function, news media fulfill its social responsibility, experts try to enhance their credibility, the public strengthens their ability to participate in politics, and through the cooperation of the six main bodies, The prevention and control system of conflict avoidance should be established.
【学位授予单位】：湖南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D630

【相似文献】