上海市区县政府行政审批改革的深化路径研究
本文选题:上海市区县政府 + 行政审批 ; 参考:《上海师范大学》2015年硕士论文
【摘要】:上海作为一座国际化大都市历来走在改革和发展的前沿,其区县政府的行政审批革工作稳步展开,也在审批事项清理、审批流程精简、审批机构服务质量、社会改组织参与改革等方面遇到了难以深化的问题。本文针对上海市区县政府行政审批改革的深化路径展开研究,以上海Y区建设工程项目审批改革为典型案例,试图从地方基层政府的行政审批改革工作现状入手,提出有较强针对性的路径和对策。本文以政府再造理论为指导,对上海市区县政府行政审批改革深化问题作了全面深入的研究。本文认为,自1999年以来上海市区县政府行政审批改革工作取得了显著的效果,主要表现在:行政审批事项梳理工作初见成效、社区事务受理中心建设渐趋成熟、行政审批工具实现了创新、行政审批流程得到简化、公共服务的理念得到了推广、行政审批法制化建设稳步推进。同时也不得不承认,上海市区县政府的行政审批制度改革还存在着诸多缺陷:核心战略未能贯彻始终、后果战略没有真正落实、顾客战略实施层次较低、极权主义现象未被有效抑制使文化变革举步维艰。造成上述问题的主要原因在于:改革未能彻底摒弃“万能政府”的自我定位、战略缺乏组合应用、传统行政文化阻碍战略实施。因此,应与全国其他地区如深圳市的行政审批改革工作进行积极的交流和比较分析,积极借鉴英、日两国行政审批制度改革的有益经验,在理清政府与市场、社会关系的前提下,采取以下路径深化上海市区县政府行政审批改革:完善绩效评估机制、建立有针对性的影响评估制度、以“顾客需求”为深化改革的基本导向、积极鼓励第三方力量参与改革。
[Abstract]:As an international metropolis, Shanghai has always been at the forefront of reform and development. The administrative examination and approval work of its district and county governments has been steadily unfolded. It is also cleaning up the examination and approval items, streamlining the examination and approval process, and the quality of service provided by the examination and approval agencies. Social reform organizations to participate in the reform and other aspects encountered difficult to deepen the problem. Based on the research of the deepening path of the administrative examination and approval reform of the county government in Shanghai, this paper takes the examination and approval reform of the construction project in area Y of Shanghai as a typical case, and attempts to start with the present situation of the administrative examination and approval reform of the local grass-roots government. Put forward strong pertinence path and countermeasure. Under the guidance of the theory of government reengineering, this paper makes a thorough study on the deepening of the reform of the administrative examination and approval of the county government in Shanghai. This paper holds that since 1999, the reform of administrative examination and approval of the county government in Shanghai has achieved remarkable results, mainly as follows: the administrative examination and approval work has achieved initial results, and the construction of the community affairs acceptance center has gradually matured. The administrative examination and approval tool has realized the innovation, the administrative examination and approval process has been simplified, the public service idea has been popularized, the administrative examination and approval legalization construction has been promoted steadily. At the same time, we also have to admit that there are still many defects in the reform of the administrative examination and approval system of Shanghai's urban and county governments: the core strategy has not been fully implemented, the consequence strategy has not really been implemented, and the level of implementation of customer strategy is relatively low. The fact that totalitarianism has not been effectively suppressed has made cultural change difficult. The main reasons for the above problems lie in the fact that the reform has not completely abandoned the self-orientation of "universal government", the lack of combination and application of strategy, and the traditional administrative culture hinders the implementation of the strategy. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out positive exchanges and comparative analyses with other regions of the country, such as Shenzhen City, to actively learn from the beneficial experience of the reform of the administrative examination and approval system between Britain and Japan, and to clarify the government and the market. Under the premise of social relations, the following ways are adopted to deepen the administrative examination and approval reform of the county government in Shanghai: to perfect the performance evaluation mechanism, to establish a targeted impact assessment system, and to take "customer demand" as the basic direction of deepening the reform. Actively encourage third parties to participate in the reform.
【学位授予单位】:上海师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D630.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 邬旭东;李荣;;美国行政审批制度改革对我国的启示[J];安徽广播电视大学学报;2008年01期
2 朱慧涛;日本行政审批制度改革的启示[J];地方政府管理;2001年05期
3 潘秀珍;;行政审批制度改革的多学科研究综述[J];广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年06期
4 姜晓萍,李文星;地方政府行政审批程序中存在的问题及对策[J];河北学刊;2002年04期
5 Akira Kawamoto,徐伟,杜钢建;规制改革、市场准入与国际市场竞争[J];国家行政学院学报;2001年02期
6 查志刚;马靖芳;;行政审批改革与法治化建设的对策与建议[J];河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2013年03期
7 黄晓春;;技术治理的运作机制研究 以上海市L街道一门式电子政务中心为案例[J];社会;2010年04期
8 谭海波;姚迈新;;我国行政服务机构研究现状综述[J];探求;2013年01期
9 段龙飞;;境外“一站式”行政服务机构建设实践及启示[J];信息化建设;2007年05期
10 北京市政府法制办课题组;行政审批设置现状与改革研究综述(上)[J];行政法学研究;2003年01期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 夏源;新媒体政府规制研究[D];浙江大学;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 王颖怡;论服务型政府理念下的行政审批制度改革[D];四川师范大学;2011年
2 张云雁;我国行政审批制度改革研究[D];华东师范大学;2006年
3 李向艳;服务型政府与行政审批制度改革[D];复旦大学;2009年
4 周俊锋;建设工程项目行政审批制度改革研究[D];吉林大学;2013年
5 王双;北京市西城区行政服务中心流程再造研究[D];华中科技大学;2013年
,本文编号:1980835
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/zhengwuguanli/1980835.html