政府危机决策的回应性缺失及其治理研究

发布时间：2018-06-08 03:31

本文选题：危机决策 + 回应性　；参考：《云南行政学院学报》2017年02期

【摘要】：在推进国家治理现代化的背景下,回应性是政府危机决策的重要属性,主要体现为:在目标上要促进公共利益、在行为上要引入公众参与、在过程中要保持透明开放、在结果上要做到公众满意。但从近年来中国政府危机决策的实践来看,回应性有所缺失,如在决策目标上存在价值偏差、在决策过程中存在个人专断、在决策方式上存在暗箱操作、在决策结果上往往火上浇油等现象。政府危机决策回应性缺失的原因主要包括政府自利、制度缺陷、工具不足和决策者素质四个方面,提升政府危机决策回应性的路径有抑制政府自利性、健全政府危机决策的相关制度、注重运用现代决策工具和技术手段、提高政府危机决策者认知心理素质等。
[Abstract]:In the context of promoting the modernization of national governance, responsiveness is an important attribute of government crisis decision-making, which is mainly reflected in the following aspects: to promote the public interest in the goal, to introduce public participation in the behavior, and to maintain transparency and openness in the process. Public satisfaction with the results should be achieved. However, from the practice of Chinese government crisis decision-making in recent years, there is a lack of responsiveness, such as the value deviation in the decision-making goal, the individual arbitrariness in the decision-making process, and the dark box operation in the decision-making mode. In the decision-making results often add fuel to the fire and other phenomena. The reasons for the lack of responsiveness of government crisis decision mainly include four aspects: government self-interest, system defect, lack of tools and the quality of decision-maker. The path of improving the responsiveness of government crisis decision has restrained the government self-interest. Improve the relevant system of government crisis decision, pay attention to using modern decision-making tools and technical means, improve the cognitive psychological quality of government crisis decision makers, etc.
【作者单位】：中共重庆市委党校公共管理教研部;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目“国家治理视域下政府回应制度化研究”(批准号:15CZZ015) 中共重庆市委党校一般项目“公共危机治理中的政府回应能力研究”的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D630

【相似文献】