国家治理的地方视角——以围绕草原政策存在的辩论为分析对象

发布时间：2018-06-20 01:11

本文选题：国家治理 + 地方视角　；参考：《甘肃行政学院学报》2017年04期

【摘要】：国家治理除了具有整体性,也有其地方性。既有的学术话语提供了两种类型的地方,分别是横向区位意义的"地方"和纵向层级意义的"地方"。针对北方草原实施的草原政策,随着从发展型话语向保护型话语的转变,看似突出了地方主体,但这两类草原政策的内里都是"国家中心"的话语逻辑,其根源在于中国建立现代国家的历程本来就是国家力量挤出横向地方而建立纵向地方的过程,从而在事实上决定了地方知识并不具有独立施展作用的空间。从规范的制度安排上看,地方政府或基层政权作为中央政府或整体国家在具体地方的代理人而具有自主性,但是从政权运行的逻辑上看,基层政权更多表现为服从性,尚不具有那种跟地方社会彼此嵌套、彼此咬合的地方自主性。化解当前围绕草原政策所存在的政策辩论、促使地方知识进入国家治理体系从而推助其现代化进程,不仅需要在研究话语上倡导"应该重视地方性知识",还有赖于实现两种"地方"及其各自蕴含的国家治理思维之间的转换。
[Abstract]:In addition to the integrity of national governance, there are also its local. The existing academic discourse provides two types of places, namely "local" in horizontal location meaning and "local" in vertical level meaning. In view of the grassland policy implemented in the northern grassland, with the transformation from developmental discourse to protective discourse, it seems that the local subjects are prominent, but both of these two types of grassland policies are the discourse logic of "national center". Its origin lies in the process of establishing a modern state in China, which is a process in which the state forces squeeze out the horizontal place and establish the vertical place, which in fact determines the space in which local knowledge does not play an independent role. From the standardised system arrangement, the local government or the grassroots political power has the autonomy as the agent of the central government or the whole country in the specific place, but from the logic of the political power operation, the grass-roots government is more submissive. There is no local autonomy that nests and bites the local society. To resolve the current policy debate surrounding the grassland policy, to promote local knowledge into the national governance system and thus to promote its modernization process, It is necessary not only to advocate that "local knowledge should be attached importance to" in the research discourse, but also to realize the transformation between the two kinds of "local" and their respective national governance thinking.
【作者单位】：内蒙古大学公共管理学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“边疆民族地区传统治理制度的现代意义研究”(16BZZ030)
【分类号】：D630

【相似文献】