青天情结与公共行政正义的关联
发布时间：2018-07-13 13:54
【摘要】：青天情结是中国特有的一种民间现象,为研究当代公共行政提供了独特的视角。本文开篇以青天人物立意,何为“青天”?清如水,明如镜,爱民如子,如同青天。在一些文学作品中,人们常常将“清官”与“青天”视为同一概念,实际上并非如此,在民众心中“青天”与“清官”在评价标准上存在着价值分野,就“清官”而言,评价标准倾向于甘于清贫、廉洁自律等,而青天本身更强调对公平正义的坚守,反映了人们相比于推崇清官清廉的品质,更看重青天对公平正义的维护。不可否认,青天人物在其所处朝代虽有缓和社会矛盾,为巩固帝制服务的一面,但他们为民做主,坚守正义的行政理念却有着超越时空的价值。故而,时至今日,当一些远离公正的弱势群体在利益受损时,仍会寄望于“青天大老爷”的出现,人们渴望“青天”式的正义。实际上,这种“青天”崇拜在一定程度上代表了当代社会正义的普遍失落,代表了人们对公共行政正义的诉求。从理论层面来讲,强调正义也是公共行政学说百年发展历史的必然选择,公共行政正义作为公共行政的核心价值,为我们进一步完善中国公共行政提供了重要逻辑基础。事实上,中国也的确存在着现实的公共行政正义困境,“青天情结”以各种各样的形式存在于现实社会当中,值得我们反思与警醒,我们并非要弘扬青天情结,而是从青天情结产生和存续的原因上汲取符合当代中国发展的行政智慧。而且公共行政正义作为公共行政首要和核心的价值,一旦缺失必然会引发公共行政问题,因而,笔者的研究主要从“青天情结”对公共行政正义的启示出发,根据其中可供借鉴的部分来寻求一种拯救公共行政正义的可能性路径。正文的主体部分首先充分论证了青天情结背后的正义诉求,然后以十八大报告提出的公共行政正义所追求的三大公平正义维度为分析框架,从青天情结与公共行政正义的契合之处出发,结合中国的现实困境,寻求路径以捍卫权利公平、保障机会公平、坚守规则公平,并最终实现当代中国所吁求的社会公平正义。
[Abstract]:Qingtian complex is a special folk phenomenon in China, which provides a unique perspective for the study of contemporary public administration. At the beginning of this article, what is the meaning of "Qingtian"? As clear as water, as clear as a mirror, love the people as the green sky. In some literary works, people often regard "Qingguan" and "Qingtian" as the same concept. In fact, this is not the case. In the minds of the public, there is a distinction of value between "Qingtian" and "Qingguan" in terms of evaluation criteria, as far as "Qingguan" is concerned. The evaluation standard tends to be willing to be poor, honest and self-discipline, while Qingtian itself emphasizes the adherence to fairness and justice, which reflects the fact that people attach more importance to the maintenance of fairness and justice than to the quality of promoting clean officials. It can not be denied that although the Qing Heaven figures in their dynasties have eased the social contradictions and served for the consolidation of the monarchy, but they have the value of transcending time and space to make decisions for the people and to adhere to the administrative concept of justice. Therefore, even today, when some vulnerable groups far from justice in the interests of damage, still hope for the emergence of "the Great Master of Heaven", people yearn for "Qingtian" type of justice. In fact, this worship of the "Green Heaven" to a certain extent represents the general loss of contemporary social justice and people's demands for public administration justice. Theoretically speaking, emphasizing that justice is also the inevitable choice of the century-old development of public administration theory. As the core value of public administration, public administration justice provides an important logical basis for us to further improve Chinese public administration. In fact, there is a real dilemma of public administration justice in China. "Qingtian complex" exists in real society in all kinds of forms. It is worth our reflection and warning. We do not want to carry forward the Qingtian complex. Instead, we draw administrative wisdom from the causes of the emergence and existence of the Qingtian complex in line with the development of contemporary China. And public administration justice is the first and core value of public administration, once it is missing, it will inevitably lead to public administration problem. Therefore, the author's research mainly starts from the enlightenment of "Qingtian complex" to public administration justice. According to the part which can be used for reference, to seek a possible way to save public administration justice. The main body of the text first fully demonstrates the justice demand behind the Qingtian complex, and then takes the three dimensions of fairness and justice pursued by the report of the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China as the analytical framework. Starting from the coincidence between the Qingtian complex and the justice of public administration, and combining with China's realistic predicament, we seek ways to safeguard the fairness of rights, guarantee the fairness of opportunities, stick to the fairness of rules, and finally realize the social fairness and justice called for by contemporary China.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D035
本文编号：2119593
[Abstract]:Qingtian complex is a special folk phenomenon in China, which provides a unique perspective for the study of contemporary public administration. At the beginning of this article, what is the meaning of "Qingtian"? As clear as water, as clear as a mirror, love the people as the green sky. In some literary works, people often regard "Qingguan" and "Qingtian" as the same concept. In fact, this is not the case. In the minds of the public, there is a distinction of value between "Qingtian" and "Qingguan" in terms of evaluation criteria, as far as "Qingguan" is concerned. The evaluation standard tends to be willing to be poor, honest and self-discipline, while Qingtian itself emphasizes the adherence to fairness and justice, which reflects the fact that people attach more importance to the maintenance of fairness and justice than to the quality of promoting clean officials. It can not be denied that although the Qing Heaven figures in their dynasties have eased the social contradictions and served for the consolidation of the monarchy, but they have the value of transcending time and space to make decisions for the people and to adhere to the administrative concept of justice. Therefore, even today, when some vulnerable groups far from justice in the interests of damage, still hope for the emergence of "the Great Master of Heaven", people yearn for "Qingtian" type of justice. In fact, this worship of the "Green Heaven" to a certain extent represents the general loss of contemporary social justice and people's demands for public administration justice. Theoretically speaking, emphasizing that justice is also the inevitable choice of the century-old development of public administration theory. As the core value of public administration, public administration justice provides an important logical basis for us to further improve Chinese public administration. In fact, there is a real dilemma of public administration justice in China. "Qingtian complex" exists in real society in all kinds of forms. It is worth our reflection and warning. We do not want to carry forward the Qingtian complex. Instead, we draw administrative wisdom from the causes of the emergence and existence of the Qingtian complex in line with the development of contemporary China. And public administration justice is the first and core value of public administration, once it is missing, it will inevitably lead to public administration problem. Therefore, the author's research mainly starts from the enlightenment of "Qingtian complex" to public administration justice. According to the part which can be used for reference, to seek a possible way to save public administration justice. The main body of the text first fully demonstrates the justice demand behind the Qingtian complex, and then takes the three dimensions of fairness and justice pursued by the report of the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China as the analytical framework. Starting from the coincidence between the Qingtian complex and the justice of public administration, and combining with China's realistic predicament, we seek ways to safeguard the fairness of rights, guarantee the fairness of opportunities, stick to the fairness of rules, and finally realize the social fairness and justice called for by contemporary China.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D035
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李玉;朱培;;论权利公平原则在行政法中的实施[J];东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2013年S2期
2 徐大建;;西方公平正义思想的演变及启示[J];上海财经大学学报;2012年03期
3 丁煌;李晓飞;;摆脱“身份危机”:中国行政学若干基本问题的再反思[J];江苏行政学院学报;2011年05期
4 王燕;;公共性缺失:公共行政的精神缺失的必然结果——读《公共行政的精神》有感[J];商品与质量;2011年S8期
5 彭柏林;;公共行政正义的伦理学解读——读《公共行政正义研究》[J];伦理学研究;2011年01期
6 杨淑林;王淑云;;对我国社会公平正义缺失及实现路径的理性分析[J];中国集体经济;2010年28期
7 姜良纲;王志强;;“青天情结”背后的话语结构[J];中国司法;2010年10期
8 I.库苏拉蒂;赵剑;;正义:社会正义和全球正义[J];世界哲学;2010年02期
9 李克龙;姚荣东;林茂申;;反思公共行政的发展逻辑——兼论现代行政发展的正义导向[J];当代社科视野;2009年11期
10 谷宇;;公共伦理学视野下的“清官信仰”研究[J];探索;2009年04期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 杨冬艳;西方公共行政正义研究[D];湖南师范大学;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 朱启彬;基于行政正义的我国公共行政核心价值取向研究[D];重庆大学;2012年
，本文编号：2119593
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/zhengwuguanli/2119593.html
