社会公平感、机构信任度与公共合作意向
发布时间：2019-03-22 17:21
【摘要】：社会公平从古至今都是人类追求的崇高社会理想。对社会公平的感知即社会公平感直接决定着个体的机构信任,并影响其公共合作参与。本研究将社会公平感分为分配公平和程序公平,将机构信任度分为工具信任和动机信任,采用实验室情境设计的方法,引入最后通牒博弈和免责博弈范式,通过2个实验系统探讨"公正无私,一言而万民齐"的因果机制。研究发现分配公平与程序公平正作用于个体的公共合作态度与意向,在此基础上建立起公共合作的双路径模型:外部路径由分配公平产生工具信任和动机信任,进而触发公共合作;内部路径由程序公平产生动机信任和工具信任,进而触发公共合作;二者结合构成个体参与公共合作的双动力系统。双路径模型的适用性在组织情境和社会情境下均得到了支持。
[Abstract]:Social justice has been a lofty social ideal pursued by mankind since ancient times. The perception of social justice, that is, the sense of social justice, directly determines the institutional trust of individuals and affects their participation in public cooperation. In this study, social justice is divided into distributive justice and procedural justice, and institutional trust is divided into tool trust and motivational trust. The method of laboratory situation design is used to introduce ultimatum game and exemption game paradigm. Through two experimental systems, this paper discusses the cause and effect mechanism of "justice and selflessness, one word and all people". It is found that distributive justice and procedural justice play a positive role in the attitude and intention of individual public cooperation. On this basis, a two-path model of public cooperation is established: the external path generates instrumental trust and motivational trust from distributive justice; Then trigger public cooperation; The internal path generates motivation trust and tool trust from procedural fairness, and then triggers public cooperation, and the combination of the two forms a dual power system for individual participation in public cooperation. The applicability of the two-path model is supported in both organizational and social contexts.
【作者单位】： 中山大学中国公共管理研究中心 政治与公共事务管理学院;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(71301170) 国家社会科学基金重大项目(13&ZD041;13&ZD011;16ZDA110)
【分类号】：D630
本文编号：2445780
[Abstract]:Social justice has been a lofty social ideal pursued by mankind since ancient times. The perception of social justice, that is, the sense of social justice, directly determines the institutional trust of individuals and affects their participation in public cooperation. In this study, social justice is divided into distributive justice and procedural justice, and institutional trust is divided into tool trust and motivational trust. The method of laboratory situation design is used to introduce ultimatum game and exemption game paradigm. Through two experimental systems, this paper discusses the cause and effect mechanism of "justice and selflessness, one word and all people". It is found that distributive justice and procedural justice play a positive role in the attitude and intention of individual public cooperation. On this basis, a two-path model of public cooperation is established: the external path generates instrumental trust and motivational trust from distributive justice; Then trigger public cooperation; The internal path generates motivation trust and tool trust from procedural fairness, and then triggers public cooperation, and the combination of the two forms a dual power system for individual participation in public cooperation. The applicability of the two-path model is supported in both organizational and social contexts.
【作者单位】： 中山大学中国公共管理研究中心 政治与公共事务管理学院;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(71301170) 国家社会科学基金重大项目(13&ZD041;13&ZD011;16ZDA110)
【分类号】：D630
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 李程宇;王蓉;;公共服务均等化改革的深化:重庆例证[J];重庆社会科学;2011年09期
2 ;[J];;年期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 记者 伏润之 实习生 宁德志;我省力促保障房分配公平公正[N];甘肃日报;2014年
，本文编号：2445780
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/zhengwuguanli/2445780.html
