限制性股票公允价值计量方法适用性选择研究
[Abstract]:The global financial crisis caused by the subprime mortgage crisis in the United States has fully exposed all kinds of malpractices in the financial market, in which the measurement of fair value of financial instruments has aroused people's strong concern. Many people think that fair value measurement is uncertain. It is difficult to accurately measure the value of listed companies by the influence of financial market volatility, which leads to the theoretical value and the actual value does not match, and forms the huge bubble of the financial market. Although fair value is not the direct cause of the financial crisis, there is no doubt about its defects in the choice of methods. The volatility of capital market makes it difficult for financial instruments to measure fair value. Stock prices, for example, are, in principle, calculated on the basis of net earnings per share, but in practice trading prices tend to be several times or even tens of times higher than net earnings per share. Therefore, the measurement of fair value of financial instruments can not simply draw lessons from the traditional accounting methods to evaluate the value of general assets. In an active market environment, the fair value of financial instruments can be obtained directly from market transactions, without the need to rely on special measurement methods. However, in recent years, due to the continuous development of financial markets, a large number of financial instruments that have no active market or can not be traded actively have emerged gradually, which makes the measurement of fair value very complicated. The fair value of such a financial instrument usually depends on complex formulas and validates the results to ensure the accuracy of the data. The lack of active market stocks is largely due to liquidity restrictions that prevent free trading in capital markets. At present, they are not uniform in academic circles, but these stocks have the common characteristics of restricted circulation, so I call them restricted stocks. The reasons for the formation of such stocks are very complex, some due to historical problems, and others to the Securities Regulatory Commission for various reasons, in order to stabilize the capital market and avoid the impact on the stock market and stock prices. Therefore, the trading quantity, time or conditions of the tradable shares held by major shareholders of listed companies are limited to a certain extent. On the basis of summarizing the characteristics of restrictive stock, this paper classifies restrictive stock into three categories according to its generality. Based on the theory of fair value hierarchy, this paper studies the fair value measurement of restricted stocks at lower levels. The ideas put forward in this paper are embodied in: first, redefining the connotation of restrictive stock and summarizing the types of restrictive stock; second, starting with the measurement method of fair value of financial instruments, The fair value level is applied to the restrictive stock measurement method, and the basis for the selection of the restrictive stock fair value measurement method is put forward, the third is to evaluate the applicability of the restrictive stock fair value measurement method. The fourth is to take (IPO), which has the largest proportion in restricted stock, as an example, to obtain fair value data by means of valuation model and statistical software, and to compare the theoretical value with the actual value and to analyze the difference. Although this paper has some novelty in the research content and research methods, in view of the complexity of the capital market environment in China, many theoretical issues involved are still to be further studied in the future. The author believes that the fair value measurement of restricted stocks will become more and more standardized as the capital market becomes more and more perfect.
【学位授予单位】:江西理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:F233;F830.91;F224
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 孙音;;美国金融危机爆发的深层原因探究[J];北方经济;2009年09期
2 郑鸣;倪玉娟;刘林;;公允价值会计制度对金融稳定的影响——兼论美国金融危机的启示[J];财经研究;2009年06期
3 陈高华;李艳;吴东立;甄立敏;;美国金融危机与公允价值计量的适用性问题[J];财会月刊;2009年01期
4 潘煜双;徐攀;;我国限制性股票公允价值计量的适用性选择[J];财会月刊;2009年31期
5 彭莉;张鼎祖;伍建筑;;限售股权定价的实证检验[J];财经理论与实践;2007年01期
6 张屹山,卢世春;对股票发行定价问题的探讨[J];财贸经济;1999年12期
7 陈远明;关于股票发行定价的计量经济模型探讨[J];重庆商学院学报;1999年02期
8 胡庭清;谢诗芬;;非活跃市场环境下公允价值计量相关问题研究[J];当代财经;2011年07期
9 谢杰;张海森;;全球金融危机爆发的原因及其对中国经济的影响[J];国际贸易问题;2009年07期
10 吴艳琴;;金融工具的公允价值计量问题及对策[J];北京工商大学学报(社会科学版);2009年03期
相关博士学位论文 前4条
1 黄松琛;从流动性和控制权分析非流通股折价的原因及对公司治理的影响[D];复旦大学;2002年
2 袁怀中;我国上市公司股权分置改革研究[D];复旦大学;2006年
3 向朝进;IPO价格形成及短期价格调整研究[D];四川大学;2006年
4 张新杨;我国限售流通A股估值研究[D];复旦大学;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 李劲;中国证券市场非流通股定价问题研究[D];对外经济贸易大学;2005年
2 司春明;对公允价值应用的探讨[D];首都经济贸易大学;2006年
3 曲洪东;IPO定价理论与实践研究[D];华东师范大学;2006年
4 武学文;限制性股票激励研究[D];首都经济贸易大学;2007年
,本文编号:2144959
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/zhqtouz/2144959.html