我国国有上市公司股票期权激励实证分析
[Abstract]:In the 1930s, with the gradual dispersion of shareholders' equity and the complexity of management technology, the separation of owners and managers appeared. In the 1960s, it became more prominent, because of the asymmetry of information, shareholders could not supervise the managers effectively; In the late 1980s, most companies around the world began to use stock options as a reward incentive to the company's high managers, in order to achieve the goal of the unity of owners and managers. In the 1990s, stock option incentive has become the main reward of American listed companies. Western countries such as Britain, Canada, France and so on have started to use stock options to motivate the managers of companies. Therefore, stock option incentive has been widely used in western countries. However, in the late 1990s, American Enron Corporation, WorldCom and other international well-known enterprises and accounting firms colluded in financial fraud to make people begin to question stock options. How to treat the stock option as an incentive means should be dialectically treated as a "double-edged sword", which not only solves the positive effect of the principal-agent relationship, but also sees the inherent defects. In recent years, the state-owned listed companies in our country put the deepening reform in the primary position of all kinds of work, around the company development, vigorously promotes the shareholding system reform, consummates the corporate governance structure, has provided the powerful motive force for the company development. With the deepening of the reform of state-owned enterprises, great changes have taken place in the organization and management mechanism of state-owned listed companies, but the actual insider control and moral hazard problems of state-owned enterprises have gradually emerged. The managers of state-owned enterprises have used their agency power to deviate from the objectives of the owners of the enterprises, resulting in serious loss of state-owned assets, inefficient utilization of assets, and lack of vitality in the development of enterprises. There exists the problem that the incentive mechanism and restraint mechanism are insufficient in the state-owned listed companies, and it has restricted the sustainable development of the state-owned listed companies in our country. Therefore, after the stock option incentive mechanism comes into our country, the state-owned listed companies in our country have carried out active study and practice one after another. This article will take the state-owned listed companies as the research object, according to the stock right incentive theory, through the use of the empirical analysis research method, to our country state-owned listed companies in the implementation stock option compensation incentive present situation. This paper analyzes some practical problems, and draws lessons from the practical experience of western developed countries in the implementation of stock option, aiming at the problems existing in the use of stock option in state-owned listed companies in China. To design a stock option incentive plan framework which can adapt to the state-owned listed companies in China. Finally, the paper analyzes the problems existing in the application of the stock option incentive system in China from the macro and micro aspects, and puts forward effective measures to improve the stock option incentive system of the state-owned listed companies in China.
【学位授予单位】:山西财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:F276.1;F832.51;F224
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 李豫湘,史长勇;股票期权计划及在国企中的运用探讨[J];商业研究;2003年18期
2 刘永春;赵亮;;上市公司管理层股权激励与公司绩效研究[J];重庆工学院学报(社会科学版);2007年08期
3 张小宁,邵建馨;期权激励的机理分析与变通设计[J];中国工业经济;2000年05期
4 郑晓玲;;美国股票期权激励的经验和启示[J];国际金融研究;2007年04期
5 罗丽萍;周晓东;郭岚;;基于EVA的知识型员工股票期权激励模式[J];经济研究导刊;2011年01期
6 李增泉;激励机制与企业绩效——一项基于上市公司的实证研究[J];会计研究;2000年01期
7 顾斌;周立烨;;我国上市公司股权激励实施效果的研究[J];会计研究;2007年02期
8 陈平平;张文贤;;论国企高管职务消费的财务监控[J];生产力研究;2008年19期
9 徐晨;股票期权的特点与效应分析[J];当代石油石化;2001年03期
相关博士学位论文 前5条
1 孙武斌;股票期权的激励机制、激励效应与绩效研究[D];西北工业大学;2003年
2 尤建强;经理股票期权定价问题研究[D];浙江大学;2006年
3 王劲松;经理股票期权的契约优化研究[D];吉林大学;2009年
4 郑晓玲;上市公司股票期权激励有效性研究[D];苏州大学;2009年
5 张宏敏;中国上市公司高管股票期权激励有效性研究[D];西南财经大学;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 李亚军;中国A股上市公司股票期权激励研究[D];首都经济贸易大学;2008年
2 魏鹏;国有上市公司经营者股票期权激励制度研究[D];山东农业大学;2008年
本文编号:2307638
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/zhqtouz/2307638.html