美国比较教育学硕士研究生培养模式研究

发布时间：2018-02-22 03:35

本文关键词： 比较教育学学科建设培养模式研究生教育美国教育　出处：《东北师范大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本研究以美国比较教育学硕士研究生项目为研究对象,梳理其培养要求、课程设置与教学组织、学术研究、实践活动,阐释各类资源和机构如何支持项目运行,评价论文研究及职业发展等实践效果。在此基础上,分析教师指导与学生发展的关系、理论学习与实践活动的关系以及硕士生培养与博士生培养的关系,评价比较教育学研究生项目对培养比较教育研究者的贡献,并归纳美国比较教育学硕士研究生培养模式的特点。目前美国比较教育学硕士研究生项目多数被称为国际与比较教育学项目,有些比较教育学项目与社会科学交叉或者其命名与发展教育相关。硕士研究生学位项目数量有所增长,但比较教育学课程比学位项目更普及。培养目标强调与实践的联系,体现跨学科性或多学科性,关注国际组织及发展中国家的教育。项目的教师多数有跨学科的教育经历和研究兴趣。学生在读博之外的毕业去向以大学(研究人员及非教学职位)、非营利组织和教育公司为主。课程设置与教学组织方面:必修课程以概论类课程为主,研究方法课程和研究设计课程次之;选修课程各个模块开设目的明确,但可选范围大;以问题为导向;考虑不同水平和开展不同类型研究的学生的需要;以研讨会的形式为主。学术研究与实践活动方面:课程学习和教师指导都与学生的个人研究项目的需要密切联系;自办的通讯类刊物是实践活动的平台之一;学位项目与多个研究中心有不同程度的互动。教学管理方面:重视信息发布;学生服务的审批程序严密;重视职业发展服务。强烈的跨学科性,强调实践导向、问题导向,重视培养获取和分析数据的能力,关注发展教育和多元文化与教育,是美国比较教育学硕士研究生项目培养模式最明显的四个特征。概论类和方法类课程在结构完整和目的明确的基础上细分,考虑开展不同类型研究的学生的需要以及群体的水平差异;学位论文或其他形式的个人研究项目处于培养过程的中心地位——这两点是美国比较教育学硕士研究生项目培养模式中值得称道的设计。
[Abstract]:This study focuses on the postgraduate program of comparative education in the United States of America, and reviews its training requirements, curriculum and teaching organization, academic research, practical activities, and explains how all kinds of resources and institutions support the operation of the project. On this basis, the author analyzes the relationship between teacher guidance and student development, the relationship between theoretical study and practical activities, and the relationship between master degree training and doctoral training. To evaluate the contribution of comparative education graduate programs to the development of comparative education researchers, At present, most of the graduate programs in the United States are called International and Comparative Education programs. Some comparative education programs are related to the intersection of social sciences or their nomenclature to development education. The number of master's degree programs has increased, but comparative education programs have become more popular than degree programs. Reflecting the interdisciplinary or multidisciplinary nature, Focus on education in international organizations and developing countries. Most of the teachers in the program have interdisciplinary educational experience and research interests. Graduates from universities (researchers and non-teaching positions, non-profit organizations) graduate from abroad. And education companies. Curriculum design and teaching organization: compulsory courses are based on general courses, The course of research method and the course of research design take the second place; each module of elective course has a clear purpose, but the scope of choice is wide; it is problem-oriented; it takes into account the needs of students at different levels and different types of research. Academic research and practical activities: curriculum learning and teacher guidance are closely related to the needs of students' individual research projects, and self-run communication publications are one of the platforms for practical activities. Degree programs interact with many research centers to varying degrees. In teaching management, emphasis is placed on information release, strict approval procedures for student services, professional development services, strong interdisciplinary, practical orientation, problem-oriented, and so on. Emphasizing the development of capacity to access and analyse data, as well as the development of education and multiculturalism and education, It is the most obvious four characteristics of the graduate program training model of the Master of Comparative Education in the United States. The general and methodological courses are subdivided on the basis of structural integrity and clear purpose. (B) consider the needs of students conducting different types of research and the differences in the level of groups; Thesis or other forms of personal research programs are at the center of the training process-these two are laudable designs in the graduate program of comparative education in the United States.
【学位授予单位】：东北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G643;G40-059.3

【参考文献】