《学记》文本评述术语的发生学研究

发布时间：2018-03-21 12:15

本文选题：《学记》　切入点：经学时代　出处：《西北师大学报(社会科学版)》2017年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：中国学术范式历经从传统学术范式向现代学术范式的历史变迁,《学记》文本评述术语在不同的学术范式下呈现出不同的学术旨趣。在经学时代,以"学"为核心的话语体系,《学记》文本评述术语呈现出由"道"至"义、序、由"再至"法"之间的操作转换,并最终以"道"的实现作为教育的圭臬;在过渡时代,经学在从"国故"向"国学"的自我学术救赎之中隐身于"现代学科"之内,《学记》文本评述术语呈现出教科书化的时代特征,并正在试图用新的学术术语为经学重新立法;在学科时代,以"教"为核心的话语体系形成,《学记》文本评述术语呈现出学科化和制度化的特点。《学记》文本评述术语的历史变迁,为实现新、旧学术范式之间的学术交流和对话,提供了可资借鉴的文本范例。
[Abstract]:The Chinese academic paradigm has undergone historical changes from the traditional academic paradigm to the modern academic paradigm. The textual commentary terms show different academic purport under different academic paradigms. In the discourse system with "learning" as the core, the commentary terms of the book of learning show the operational transformation from "Tao" to "meaning", the order from "Tao" to "law", and finally regard the realization of "Tao" as the standard of education. The Confucian classics is hidden in the "modern discipline" in the process of academic redemption from the "national heritage" to the "Chinese learning". The commentary terms of the text of the Book of Learning show the characteristics of the textbook times, and are trying to re-legislate the classics with the new academic terms. In the era of discipline, the discourse system with "teaching" as the core was formed, and the commentary terms of "Learning Notes" showed the characteristics of discipline and institutionalization. Academic exchanges and dialogues between the old academic paradigms provide examples of texts that can be used for reference.
【作者单位】：山西大学教育科学学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金教育学一般课题“中国古代教育学范畴发生史:以《学记》为中心”(BOA150030)
【分类号】：G40

【相似文献】