阅读式疗法对某医科大学学生心理健康干预效果评价

发布时间：2018-06-07 22:22

本文选题：阅读疗法 + 精神卫生　；参考：《中国学校卫生》2017年05期

【摘要】：目的探讨阅读式疗法对山西医科大学学生心理健康的影响效果,为改善大学生心理健康状况提供参考。方法随机选取山西医科大学2015级1 988名大一新生为研究对象,对736名大学生实施3个月的阅读式疗法干预,其余的1 252名大学生作为对照组,采用中国大学生心理健康量表对阅读式疗法的效果进行量化评估。结果干预前,干预组与对照组大学生心理健康量表各维度得分差异均无统计学意义(P值均0.05);干预3个月后,干预组与对照组各维度得分,除躯体化差异无统计学意义外(t=-1.36,P0.05),其余11个维度的差异均有统计学意义(P值均0.05),且干预组明显低于对照组。对比干预组在干预前后各维度得分,除依赖(t=1.27,P0.05)和冲动(t=-0.61,P0.05)2项外,其余10个维度差异均有统计学意义(P值均0.05),且干预后得分明显低于干预前。结论阅读式疗法对改善大学生心理健康状况有积极效果。但在依赖和冲动方面效果欠佳,可能与干预时间短、硬件条件不足、干预过程尚不完善等有关。
[Abstract]:Objective to explore the effect of reading therapy on the mental health of students in Shanxi Medical University. Methods A total of 1,988 freshmen from 2015 grade of Shanxi Medical University were randomly selected as the study subjects, 736 college students were treated with reading therapy for 3 months, and the other 1,252 college students were used as the control group. Chinese college students' mental health scale was used to quantitatively evaluate the effect of reading therapy. Results before the intervention, there was no significant difference in the scores of mental health scale between the intervention group and the control group (P < 0.05), and after 3 months of intervention, the scores of each dimension between the intervention group and the control group were not statistically significant. Except for somatization, there was no statistical difference between the two groups, but there were significant differences in the other 11 dimensions (P < 0.05), which were significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group. The scores of each dimension before and after intervention in the intervention group were significantly lower than those before and after intervention, except for the two items of dependence (1.27, P 0.05) and impulsive tachycardia (-0.61g, P 0.05N), and the scores after intervention were significantly lower than those before intervention. Conclusion Reading therapy has a positive effect on improving the mental health of college students. However, the poor effect of dependence and impulse may be related to the short time of intervention, the shortage of hardware condition, the imperfect process of intervention and so on.
【作者单位】：山西医科大学管理学院;山西医科大学公共卫生学院;
【分类号】：G444;R-4

【相似文献】