临床教学基地教学质量评价指标体系研究

发布时间：2018-01-03 10:04

本文关键词：临床教学基地教学质量评价指标体系研究　出处：《福建医科大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：目的:临床教学基地教学质量评价是高等医学院校本科教学质量保障体系的重要组成部分。长期以来,地方医学院校对临床教学基地的评价主要以教学条件建设为主,在教学过程管理、教学实施质量、学生培养质量评价方面未能得到体现。本研究通过文献复习、现状研究、问卷调查、专家访谈等手段,依托福建医科大学,构建一套较为科学合理的临床教学基地教学质量评价指标体系,为引导临床教学基地规范本科临床教学工作,加强高等医学院校本科教学质量内部保障体系建设提供决策参考。方法:本研究通过大量查阅文献、相关政策文件,结合所在学校实际情况,收集了56项评价指标作为备选。通过Delphi专家咨询法,筛选并确定临床教学基地教学质量评价指标,应用层次分析法(AHP)确定各指标权重。选取1所直属附属医院,2所非直属附属医院开展实证研究,对医院本科教学质量进行评价。主要结果:(1)确立了53项临床教学基地教学质量评价指标,包括按照教学工作指导思想、教学管理、教学条件、教学实施与学生发展5个层面,基本涵盖了临床教学组织、实施与效果的各个方面,代表性和可操作性较强。(2)按照维度层、目标层、指标层各个层次,确定了各项指标权重系数,明确各指标在教学质量综合评价体系中所占的比重。(3)实证研究表明,非直属附属医院在教学条件方面与直属附属医院质量相当,直属附属医院在教学工作地位、教学管理、教学实施和学生发展方面比非直属附属医院综合质量高。结论:临床教学基地教学质量评价是较为复杂的一项工作,但应用前景广阔。做好评价工作,不仅要建立科学合理的评价体系,也应组建合理的评价小组负责具体工作,更要充分应用信息化手段。评价结果不仅反映教学医院的教学水平,也反映医院和学校的教学质量保障水平,具有双方面的借鉴意义。
[Abstract]:Objective: To evaluate the quality of clinical teaching base is an important part of the quality assurance system of undergraduate teaching in medical colleges. For a long time, the evaluation of the clinical teaching base of local medical colleges mainly in the construction of teaching condition, in the process of teaching management, teaching quality, students' Cultivation Quality evaluation has not been reflected in this study through the literature review. The status quo, research, questionnaire survey, expert interviews and other means, relying on the Fujian Medical University, to build a more scientific and reasonable teaching quality evaluation index system of clinical teaching bases, to guide and standardize clinical teaching base for clinical undergraduate teaching work, strengthen the construction of undergraduate teaching quality in medical colleges internal security system to provide decision-making reference. Methods: the study by consulting a large number of the literature, related policy documents, combined with the actual situation of the school, a collection of 56 evaluation indexes for Delphi is an alternative. Through expert consultation, screening and determine the evaluation index of clinical teaching base and teaching quality, using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to determine the weight of each index. Selecting 1 affiliated hospitals, 2 empirical studies carried out by non Affiliated Hospital, to evaluate the quality of undergraduate teaching hospital. The main results: (1) established 53 teaching quality of clinical teaching bases including the evaluation index, according to the teaching guiding ideology, teaching management, teaching conditions, teaching and development of students in 5 aspects, covering all aspects of clinical teaching organization, implementation and effect, representative and strong operability. (2) according to the dimension of target layer layer, index layer, each layer, determine the index weight coefficient of each index, clearly accounted for in the comprehensive evaluation system of teaching quality in the proportion (3). The empirical study shows that the non Affiliated Hospital in the teaching conditions and straight The quality is hospital management, teaching in the work place, directly affiliated hospital, teaching and development of students than the non directly affiliated hospital. Conclusion: high quality comprehensive evaluation of teaching quality of clinical teaching base is a more complex, but the broad application prospect. Do the evaluation work, not only to establish a scientific and reasonable evaluation system also, should set up a reasonable evaluation team is responsible for the specific work, but also to make full use of information technology. The evaluation results not only reflect the teaching level of teaching hospitals, but also reflect the teaching quality assurance level of hospitals and schools, has double significance.

【学位授予单位】：福建医科大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：R-4;G642

【相似文献】