完善高校科研评价的思考

发布时间：2018-05-31 08:22

本文选题：高等学校 + 科学研究　；参考：《科技进步与对策》2013年03期

【摘要】：我国高校科研评价普遍推行以科研业绩点和科研成果数量为核心的计量评价方法,主要用以评价高水平的自然科学成果。虽然具有简单易行和便于操作的优点,但如果将其简单套用和无限扩大,在实施中不仅会严重违背科学研究的基本规律,还会引发部分教师急功近利和单打独斗的行为,造成学科发展的不平衡,不利于人文社会科学的繁荣发展。因此,根据事物同类可比的原则,结合科学研究的不同类型、学科的不同门类、研究者的不同年龄阶段和职称层次特点,针对研究内容、性质、目标与任务等各方面的差异,赋予各类科研工作以不同的评价内涵和要求,采用分类分层评价方法,适度淡化科研评价激励的约束功能,营造宽松的科研环境。
[Abstract]:The evaluation of scientific research in colleges and universities in China generally adopts the metrological evaluation method based on the achievements of scientific research and the quantity of scientific research achievements, which is mainly used to evaluate the high level of natural science achievements. Although it has the advantages of simplicity and ease of operation, if it is applied and expanded infinitely, it will not only seriously violate the basic laws of scientific research in its implementation, but also lead to the behavior of some teachers who are eager for quick results, instant gains, and fighting alone. The imbalance of subject development is not conducive to the prosperity and development of humanities and social sciences. Therefore, according to the comparable principle of the same kind of things, combined with the different types of scientific research, different disciplines, different age stages and professional titles of researchers, the differences in contents, properties, objectives and tasks of the research, etc. Different evaluation connotations and requirements are given to all kinds of scientific research work. The classification and stratification evaluation method is adopted, the restriction function of scientific research evaluation incentive is desalinated moderately, and a relaxed scientific research environment is created.
【作者单位】：宝鸡文理学院经济管理系;
【基金】：陕西省社科基金项目(10E169) 2011陕西省科技计划项目(2011KRM10) 陕西省教育厅2011年专项科研计划项目(11JK149)
【分类号】：G644

【参考文献】