《华盛顿协议》签约国与我国大学物理基础课程教学内容的比较研究

发布时间：2018-06-12 23:22

本文选题：工科大学物理 + 比较研究　；参考：《合肥工业大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：在2010年6月国家教育部启动了“卓越工程师教育培养计划”的背景下，各个高校都在探索“卓越工程师”的培养方案和方式，各个学科也努力改革自己的教学模式与教学内容为培养优秀工程人才的目的服务。大学物理作为工科各专业必修的基础课程，教学模式与教学内容如何更加符合工科专业的特色，如何更好的培养工科专业学生的能力与素质，如何更好的促进工科学生的成长是大学物理教学所要积极面对和思考的问题。论文在“卓越工程师教育培养计划”背景下，系统分析和比较针对本科阶段的工程师学历教育互认组织《华盛顿协议》签约国与我国工科大学物理的教学情况，从教学内容、课程设置、教材建设等方面分析了各自的特点。将《华盛顿协议》签约国知名教材教学内容，教材编排，习题等与我国国家教育部高等学校物理基础课程教学指导分委会颁布的《理工科类大学物理课程教学基本要求》和国内知名大学物理教材的教学内容相比较，将国内高校工科大学物理课程设置与《华盛顿协议》签约国高校大学物理课程设置相比较，分析了《华盛顿协议》签约国与我国的工科大学物理在教学内容、课程设置、教材建设方面的差异，并结合国内工科大学物理教学对象的基础和国内工科教育的实际情况总结了对比研究对我国工科大学物理教学改革的启示。论文指出我国工科大学物理教学在教学内容、课程设置和教材建设中在保留优势基础上,要注重创新能力的培养和解决问题的能力的提高，要体现工科专业特点以及有利于工科学生的可持续发展，更多地体现“人本主义”的特色，更好地促进工程教育，，促进工科学生在知识、能力、素质全面发展，为培养卓越优秀的工科人才服务。
[Abstract]:In June 2010, the Ministry of Education launched the "excellent Engineers Education and training Program", each university is exploring the "excellent engineer" training programs and methods. Each discipline also strives to reform its own teaching mode and content to serve the purpose of cultivating outstanding engineering talents. College physics is a compulsory basic course for engineering majors. How can the teaching mode and teaching contents be more in line with the characteristics of engineering majors, and how to better cultivate the ability and quality of engineering students? How to better promote the growth of engineering students is a problem to be actively faced and pondered in college physics teaching. Under the background of "excellent engineer Education and training Program", this paper systematically analyzes and compares the teaching situation of physics between the signatory countries of the "Washington Agreement" and China's engineering universities, aiming at the mutual recognition of engineers' academic qualifications at the undergraduate stage. The characteristics of curriculum and textbook construction are analyzed. The contents of teaching and the arrangement of teaching materials for well-known signatories to the Washington Agreement, The exercises are compared with the basic requirements for Physics Teaching in Universities of Science and Engineering, promulgated by the National Ministry of Education, and the teaching contents of physics textbooks of well-known universities in China. This paper compares the physics curriculum of the engineering university in China with that of the university physics in the signatory country of the Washington Agreement, and analyzes the teaching content and curriculum design of the physics course in the engineering university between the signatory country and our country. The differences in the construction of teaching materials, combined with the foundation of physics teaching objects in engineering universities in China and the actual situation of engineering education in China, are summarized and the enlightenment of the comparative study to the reform of physics teaching in engineering universities in China is summarized. The paper points out that on the basis of retaining advantages in physics teaching of engineering universities in our country, we should pay attention to the cultivation of innovation ability and the improvement of problem-solving ability on the basis of retaining advantages in teaching content, curriculum and textbook construction. It is necessary to embody the characteristics of engineering specialty and be beneficial to the sustainable development of engineering students, to embody the characteristics of humanism, to promote engineering education, and to promote the all-round development of engineering students in knowledge, ability and quality. To train outstanding engineering personnel service.
【学位授予单位】：合肥工业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：O4-4;G642

【参考文献】