我国公立大学治理路径研究
[Abstract]:At present, there is a potential performance crisis in Chinese universities. The efficiency of educational input and output is not high, the quality of education is declining, and the academic productivity and innovation ability are insufficient. The defects and failures of the university system are the deep-seated causes of the performance crisis faced by the universities in our country. Optimizing the governance path of the universities in our country is the urgent task to get rid of the current performance crisis. The essential function, organizational attributes and the external environment of the university determine the governance form of the university. After nearly a thousand years of development, university organizations have formed a unified and complex organizational functions and organizational attributes. After the founding of New China, great changes have taken place in the social environment of our country, and the governance of universities has been explored and reformed for more than 60 years, and has gone through a period of highly unified centralized governance, a period of blind and chaotic decentralization. The coexistence of multiple interests and limited decentralization of governance period and other different stages. Great achievements have been made in the reform of university governance in our country, but at the same time, there are also important problems to be solved in the new historical period. On the aspect of external governance, the government has improper management mode and excessive interference in university self-management. The traditional industry-university-research cooperation has not made the university and each external subject form close, long-term and stable strategic synergistic relationship, and the synergy effect has not been effectively brought into play. In terms of internal governance, the essence of the current leadership system under the leadership of the party committee under the leadership of the planned economic system is still the governance mode of administrative centralization and closed running of schools. Power structure is in a serious imbalance, political power and administrative power are in a strong position, academic power and democratic power are weakened, and students' power is in a state of absence. Market power and social power are blocked in the internal governance structure. In the aspect of system standard, most colleges and universities do not make the university charter according to law, and the university is in the situation of running a school without rules or regulations. The optimization of the governance path of public universities in China is a complex system engineering, which involves not only the external and internal governance of universities, but also the coordination and reorganization of pluralistic and conflicting interests. At the same time, the reform also conforms to the requirements and constraints of the political and cultural system with Chinese characteristics. In this paper, we can optimize the governance path of our public universities from the following aspects: external governance path, through the implementation of education vouchers to optimize the allocation of educational resources; Through collaborative innovation to construct the strategic synergy between universities and industry-university-research cooperative organizations. In terms of internal governance path, we should reform the university board of directors to build a multi-subject co-governing governance model, and improve the institutional guarantee of governing the university according to law by formulating and perfecting the university charter.
【学位授予单位】:西南交通大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:G647
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 龙宗智;;依法治校与高校领导体制的改革完善[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2005年01期
2 杨克瑞;美国《高等教育法》的历史演变分析[J];比较教育研究;2005年04期
3 李福华;尹增刚;;论大学治理的理论基础——国际视野中的多学科观点[J];比较教育研究;2007年09期
4 王英杰;;大学学术权力和行政权力冲突解析——一个文化的视角[J];北京大学教育评论;2007年01期
5 张斌贤,孙益;西欧中世纪大学的特权[J];北京师范大学学报(社会科学版);2004年04期
6 劳凯声;;教育体制改革中的高等学校法律地位变迁[J];北京师范大学学报(社会科学版);2007年02期
7 郭卉;;我国公立大学治理变革的困境与破解——基于路径依赖理论的分析[J];湖南师范大学教育科学学报;2011年05期
8 陈文干;;二战后美国联邦政府干预高等教育的历史演变——政策法规的视角[J];高等工程教育研究;2007年01期
9 甘永涛;;大学治理结构的三种国际模式[J];高等工程教育研究;2007年02期
10 马永斌;王孙禺;;大学、政府和企业三重螺旋模型探析[J];高等工程教育研究;2008年05期
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 张圣祺;治理理论视域下我国政府与大学关系研究[D];吉林大学;2012年
2 查永军;中国大学学术管理中的学术权力与行政权力冲突研究[D];华中科技大学;2009年
3 王诗宗;治理理论及其中国适用性[D];浙江大学;2009年
,本文编号:2422065
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/shifanjiaoyulunwen/2422065.html