CBA2013-2014赛季新疆广汇队总决赛失利原因分析

发布时间：2017-12-26 18:19

本文关键词：CBA2013-2014赛季新疆广汇队总决赛失利原因分析　出处：《成都体育学院》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：中国男子篮球职业篮球联赛(即CBA)经历了接近二十年的发展,联赛竞技水平逐年提高,出现过八一队七次获得总冠军、广东宏远七次蝉联总冠军,2010-11赛季后,北京队进行重组,两次获得联赛总冠军。而CBA各队中,新疆广汇队一直是夺冠大热门,却屡屡与冠军失之交臂。运用文献资料法、影像观察法、数理统计法、对比分析法以CBA2013-2014赛季总决赛新疆广汇队与北京金隅队6场比赛为研究对象,通过两支球队各项数据的对比分析,探讨新疆队失利的原因。得出以下结论:1、新疆队组织后卫以及前锋球员能力差是新疆队本次总冠军争夺战失利的重要原因。2、教练员方面,新疆队教练员在执教年限、运动经历以及临场指挥方面与北京队教练员存在一定差异。新疆队有效暂停比北京队多,但是进攻端有效暂停得分比北京队少。防守端失分情况比北京队严重。换人方面,新疆队换人次数多。换人2分钟内,替补队员得分北京队较好于新疆队。3、得分能力方面,新疆队2分球命中率和罚球命中率均低于北京队。新疆队在比赛中助攻得分少、失误多;北京队更为注重对抢断、盖帽等技术的运用。拼抢篮板球方面,两队均注重后场篮板球的拼抢,新疆队更为注重对前场篮板球的拼抢,但二次进攻的成功率较低;在拼抢人数上,新疆队略占优势。4、得分方式上,2分球得分方式中,两队均以运球突破上篮为主要得分方式,但北京队技术运用更为合理,命中率高的技术运用更多。3分球得分方式中,两队均以接传球原地跳投为主,新疆队技术运用更合理,命中率更高。5、得分区域方面,2分球得分区域中,两队均注重限制区内得分,但北京队限制区外3分线内得分更多,得分区域分布更合理。3分球得分区域中,均注重弧顶和两侧45度角投篮区域的得分,新疆队较好于北京队。6、战术配合方面,进攻端,新疆队个人进攻次数少但个人进攻成功率较高。进攻基础配合中,北京队配合次数少但成功率较高。进攻战术中,北京队进攻战术运用更合理,能够有效破坏新疆队的防守战术,获得得分。防守战术配合方面,北京队基础配合比新疆队合理,成功率较高。防守战术中,北京队能够有效遏制新疆队的主要进攻战术,在一定程度上左右比赛的胜负。
[Abstract]:Chinese basketball occupation basketball league (CBA) has experienced nearly twenty years of development, athletics level increased year by year, there have been seven times the Bayi team won the championship, the Guangdong tigers won the seven championship, 2010-11 season, Beijing team won two league restructuring championship. In the CBA teams, the Xinjiang Guanghui team has always been the most popular champion, but it has repeatedly been lost with the champion. By using the methods of documentation, image observation, mathematical statistics and contrastive analysis, taking the 6 matches of Xinjiang Guanghui team and Beijing Jinyu team in the CBA2013-2014 season finals as the research object, the reasons for the defeat of Xinjiang team were discussed through the comparative analysis of the data of two teams. The following conclusions are drawn: 1. The poor ability of the Xinjiang team to organize the guard and the forward players is an important reason for the defeat of the Xinjiang team. 2, coaches, the coaches of Xinjiang team in teaching years, sports experience and the command of the Beijing team, there are certain differences with the coaches of the team. The Xinjiang team effectively suspended more than the Beijing team, but the attack side effectively suspended the score less than the Beijing team. The defensive end up worse than the Beijing team. In the exchange of people, the Xinjiang team changed a lot. Within 2 minutes of the replacement, the substitutes scored better in Beijing than the Xinjiang team. 3, scoring ability, Xinjiang team 2 points hit rate and penalty shot hit rate are lower than the Beijing team. Xinjiang team has fewer assists and more mistakes in the competition, and the Beijing team pays more attention to the application of the technology of the steals, the cap and so on. The rebound, the two teams are on the defensive rebound and play the Xinjiang team to pay more attention to the offensive rebound fighting, but the two attack success rate is low; in Pinqiang number, Xinjiang team a slight advantage. 4, scoring way, 2 points scoring way, both teams are dribbling breakthrough layup as the main scoring way, but Beijing team technology is more reasonable, high hit technology application more. In the way of scoring 3 points, both teams are the main jumpers in place of passing the ball, and the Xinjiang team has more reasonable technical use and higher hit rate. 5, scoring area, 2 teams scored in the scoring area, both teams all focused on the restricted zone score, but Beijing scored 3 more points outside the restricted area, and the score area distribution was more reasonable. 3 points in the scoring area, both focus on the arc and both sides of the 45 - degree corner shooting area, Xinjiang team is better than the Beijing team. 6, the tactical coordination, the offensive end, the Xinjiang team has fewer individual attacks but the individual attack success rate is high. In the basic coordination of the attack, Beijing team has fewer times of coordination but has a high success rate. In the offensive tactics, the offensive tactics of the Beijing team are more reasonable, which can effectively destroy the defensive tactics of the Xinjiang team and get the score. Defensive tactics match, Beijing team's basic coordination is more reasonable than Xinjiang team, and the success rate is high. In defense tactics, the Beijing team can effectively curb the main offensive tactics of the Xinjiang team, to a certain extent the victory or defeat of the game.
【学位授予单位】：成都体育学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：G841

【相似文献】