我国职业篮球联赛的反垄断法律规制

发布时间：2017-12-27 12:05

  本文关键词：我国职业篮球联赛的反垄断法律规制　出处：《河北大学》2016年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

  更多相关文章： 职业篮球联赛 行政垄断 反垄断法 法律规制

【摘要】：我国《反垄断法》自2008年8月1日生效实施以来,经过八年时间的实践,逐步暴露出了一些问题。值得注意的是随着我国体育产业的发展,职业体育的兴起,职业体育领域出现了垄断现象,其中的行政垄断行为已经成为我国职业体育进一步发展的绊脚石,特别是在我国职业篮球联赛中,行政垄断行为限制了体育联赛各俱乐部之间的有效公平竞争,但是由于我国体育产业的国情,《反垄断法》直接适用于我国职业篮球联赛存在着诸多的困难。职业体育在世界范围内有巨大的影响力,参与人数越来越多。特别是在我国,随着足球、篮球等运动的职业化改革不断深入,体育产业已经成为国民经济的重要组成部分。职业篮球联赛是市场化的产物,在各国呈现出不同的特点,也不可避免的存在垄断行为。在我国职业篮球联赛中,垄断行为主表现为控制俱乐部准入、限制运动员的具体薪金、限制运动员自由流动,控制俱乐部的买卖方面。由于我国体育竞技的背景,这些垄断行为具有很强的行政属性,属于行政垄断,对联赛本身造成了严重的不利影响。众所周知,美国在运用反垄断法规制职业体育方面有成功的经验,通过利用“合理分析原则”和“关键设施理论”对各种垄断行为进行详尽的分析,以实现对垄断行为的规制。我国《反垄断法》在规制职业体育方面尚不成熟,借鉴美国的成功经验能够更好的发挥其对市场的规范作用,保护经营者消费者的合法权益。我国职业篮球联赛应当适用《反垄断法》,同时考虑到职业体育的特殊性,应当建立与我国职业体育相适应的反垄断法豁免制度,对联赛中所必要的基本制度在反垄断法上予以豁免,如准入制度,工资帽制度等。此外还要进一步完善我国反垄断法的私人执行制度,以更好的保护消费者的利益。
[Abstract]:Since the implementation of the anti-monopoly law in August 1, 2008, after eight years of practice, some problems have been exposed gradually. It is worth noting that with the development of China's sports industry, the rise of sports occupation, occupation sports appeared in the field of monopoly, the administrative monopoly has become a stumbling block to the further development of occupation sports in China, especially in the Chinese occupation basketball league, administrative monopoly restrict the effective and fair competition between Sports League clubs however, due to China's sports industry conditions, "directly applicable to our country occupation basketball league there are many difficulties in anti-monopoly law". Professional sports have great influence in the world and more and more people participate. Especially in China, the sports industry has become an important part of the national economy with the deepening of the professional reform of football and basketball. The professional basketball league is the product of the market, and there are different characteristics in various countries, and there are unavoidable monopolies. In our professional basketball league matches, monopolistic behaviors are mainly to control Club access, restrict athletes' specific salaries, restrict free flow of athletes, and control the business of clubs. Because of the background of China's sports competition, these monopolies have strong administrative attributes, and they belong to administrative monopoly, which have caused serious adverse effects on the League itself. As we all know, the United States has successful experience in the regulation of professional sports through the use of anti-monopoly law. Through the use of the "reasonable analysis principle" and "critical facilities theory", we conduct a detailed analysis of various monopolistic behaviors in order to achieve the regulation of monopoly behavior. China's anti-monopoly law is not mature in regulating professional sports. Drawing on the successful experience of the United States, we can better play its normative role in the market and protect the legitimate rights and interests of the operators and consumers. Chinese occupation basketball league should apply the "anti-monopoly law" at the same time, considering the particularity of sports occupation, occupation and sports of our country should be established to adapt to the exemption system of anti-monopoly law, the basic system of competition necessary antithetical couplet exemption in anti-monopoly law, such as access system, salary cap system etc.. In addition, we should further improve the private enforcement system of China's antitrust law so as to better protect the interests of consumers.
【学位授予单位】：河北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D922.294;G841
，

本文编号：1341624