2014-2015赛季CBA职业联赛本土球员综合实力比较分析

发布时间：2018-01-03 07:04

本文关键词：2014-2015赛季CBA职业联赛本土球员综合实力比较分析　出处：《首都体育学院》2016年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

更多相关文章： CBA 本土球员 综合实力 比较分析

【摘要】：本研究旨在界定篮球运动员综合实力的概念,归纳篮球运动员综合实力的框架与主要指标,并对2014-2015赛季CBA职业联赛的本土球员的综合实力进行比较,得出本土球员内部(即90后本土球员与80后本土球员)综合实力比较情况及本土球员与外籍球员综合实力的比较情况,分析其存在的差距,探究其综合实力的差距原因,为本土球员综合实力提高,球队建设以及中国篮球综合实力的提升提供方向参考。本研究以篮球运动员综合实力为比较指标,以2014-2015赛季CBA职业联赛本土球员为研究对象,以哲学、心理学、运动生理学、运动训练学和篮球专项理论等为基础,运用文献资料法、逻辑分析法、德尔菲专家调查法、数理统计等综合性研究方法,通过研究,本文得出以下主要结论:1,篮球运动员综合实力定义是对篮球运动员在篮球运动中所表现出水平的综合评定。篮球运动员综合实力包括硬实力(可量化指标)与软实力(不可量化指标)。硬实力包括体能、技术能力、战术能力。软实力包括智力指标与非智力指标。其中技术能力是所有能力的综合体现,做为综合实力的核心力,在综合实力评价中占主要部分。2,2014-2015赛季CBA联赛发展势头良好,参赛队伍增加至20支,常规赛场次增加至380场,外援数量增加至57人,整个赛季常规赛场均观赛人数为4265人,上座率为68.86%,比上赛季提高了5.52%,社会关注度与参与度进一步提升。北京队通过38轮共38场常规赛,3轮共14场季后赛,凭借出色表现卫冕冠军。3,2014-2015赛季CBA职业联赛,本土球员与外籍球援综合实力标准化差值在常规赛表现中,技术性指标为得分-15.6,积极性指标为篮板-5.0,意识性指标为助攻-1.5、抢断-0.6,盖帽-0.3,被动性指标为失误-1.3、犯规+0.9,其季后赛表现中,技术性指标为得分-12.5,积极性指标为篮板-4.6,意识性指标为助攻-2.9、抢断-0.4、盖帽-0.7,被动性指标为失误-1.7、犯规-0.1,表现出得分能力不强、助攻及抢断意识差、篮板球保护不足、在控制失误方面表现尚可、控制犯规方面,季后赛表现要相对优于常规赛。4,2014-2015赛季CBA职业联赛,90后球员与80后球员综合实力标准化差值在常规赛表现中,技术性指标为为得分-0.8,积极性指标为篮板-0.3,意识性指标为助攻-0.8、抢断-0.2、盖帽+0.0,被动性指标为失误-0.2、犯规+0.3,其季后赛表现中,技术性指标为得分-0.7,积极性指标篮板-1.8,意识性指标为助攻-0.4、抢断+0.5、盖帽-0.3,被动性指标为失误+0.1、犯规-0.9,表现出得分能力稍弱,助攻意识差,篮板球保护不力、失误较多、盖帽能力不强,控制犯规方面尚可,季后赛部分指标优于常规赛。
[Abstract]:This paper aims at defining the concept of the comprehensive strength of basketball players, basketball players of the comprehensive strength of inductive framework and main indexes, compare the comprehensive strength and the 2014-2015 season CBA occupation league players, the players internal (i.e. 90 players and 80 local players) compared to the comprehensive strength and comparison with foreign players the overall strength of the players, analyze the existing gap, gap between the reasons for its comprehensive strength, improve the comprehensive strength of the local players, the team construction and provide reference to enhance the comprehensive strength of Chinese basketball. The basketball athlete comprehensive strength comparison index, in the 2014-2015 season CBA occupation league players as the research object, based on philosophy, psychology, sports physiology, sports training and basketball theory, using the method of literature, logical analysis, Delphy of expert investigation, comprehensive research method, mathematical statistics etc. through the research, this paper draws the following conclusions: 1, comprehensive strength is defined as a basketball player of the basketball players in basketball performance comprehensive evaluation level of basketball players. The comprehensive strength of hard power (including quantitative indicators) and soft power (not quantitative indicators). Hard power including physical, technical ability, tactical ability. Soft power including intelligence and non intelligence index index. The technical ability is a comprehensive reflection of all the core force for comprehensive strength, in the evaluation of the comprehensive strength in the.22014-2015 CBA season accounted for the major part of the good momentum of development, the team increased to 20 a regular season time increased to 380, the number of foreign players increased to 57, the entire season regular season attendance was 4265, attendance was 68.86%, 5.52% higher than last season, agency Will further enhance the degree of attention and participation. The Beijing team through the 38 round of a total of 38 regular season games, 3 round total of 14 playoff games, with outstanding performance and defending champion.32014-2015 CBA occupation league season, local players and foreign players comprehensive strength of normalized difference in the regular season, the technical index for the -15.6 score, enthusiasm the index for -5.0 rebounds, consciousness index for -1.5 assists and steals blocks -0.6, -0.3, passive index error -1.3, foul +0.9, the playoff performance, technical indicators for the score -12.5, positive index for -4.6 rebounds, consciousness index for -2.9 assists and steals blocks -0.4, -0.7, passive index error -1.7, -0.1 showed a foul, scoring ability is not strong, assists and steals the rebound consciousness is poor, inadequate protection, the performance can be in error control, control foul, playoff performance than the.42014-2015 regular season CB A occupation League, 90 players and 80 players comprehensive strength of normalized difference in the regular season, the technical index for the -0.8 score, positive index for -0.3 rebounds, consciousness index for -0.8 assists and steals blocks -0.2, +0.0, passive index error -0.2, foul +0.3, the playoff performance in technology as the -0.7 index score, positive index -1.8 rebounds, consciousness index for -0.4 assists and steals blocks +0.5, -0.3, passive index error +0.1, foul -0.9, showed weaker ability to score, assists rebounds poor awareness of protection, more mistakes, the blocking ability is not strong, control foul can, the playoffs some indicators better than the regular season.

【学位授予单位】：首都体育学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：G841

【相似文献】