国际体育仲裁裁决的特殊效力:以CAS的仲裁权为视角

发布时间：2018-02-27 00:04

本文关键词： 国际体育仲裁院仲裁权仲裁裁决判例法　出处：《成都体育学院学报》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：不同于一般的商事仲裁权,国际体育仲裁院的仲裁权具有社会司法权属性。以此为视角,运用英美法系的判例法原理,国际体育仲裁院具有"司法造法"权,其作出的仲裁裁决不仅具有终局性和可执行性等一般民商事仲裁的效力,更具有判例法的特殊效力,对以后同类的国际体育纠纷具有"先例"的作用。从内容上看,国际体育仲裁院创设的判例法规则包括创造性的、解释性的和补充性的三种,是国际体育法的重要渊源之一。国际体育仲裁院形成的"先例"对解释国际体育法规则,指导具体纠纷个案的裁决,以及发展新的国际体育法规则都起到了积极的作用,但CAS判例法不能代替制定法,而是作为制定法的补充发挥作用。
[Abstract]:Different from the general commercial arbitration right, the arbitration right of the International Sports Arbitration Court has the attribute of social judicial power. From this perspective, using the case law principle of the Anglo-American legal system, the International Sports Arbitration Court has the right of "judicial making law". Its arbitration award not only has the effect of general civil and commercial arbitration, such as finality and enforceability, but also has the special effect of case law, and has the function of "precedent" to the international sports disputes of the same kind in the future. The rules of case law created by the International Court of Sport Arbitration include three kinds: creative, explanatory and supplementary, which are one of the important sources of international sports law. The decision of specific dispute cases and the development of new rules of international sports law all play a positive role, but the case law of CAS can not replace the statutory law, but as a supplement to the statutory law.
【作者单位】：广州大学体育学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目:“国际体育法的理论与运作实践:以法社会学为视角”(14YJC890028)
【分类号】：G80-05

【相似文献】