羽毛球男子单打选手谌龙与世界优秀羽毛球选手技术特征对比分析

发布时间：2018-03-06 20:02

本文选题：羽毛球　切入点：谌龙　出处：《成都体育学院》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本文主要通过文献资料法,录像分析法,数理统计法,比较分析法等对运动员谌龙与林丹、李宗伟、J-约根森、阿塞尔森的25场比赛中各项技术运用情况统计通过数据对比分析,来研究运动员谌龙在比赛中的实际表现以及技术使用情况,找出谌龙在比赛中的优点以及缺点,并根据数据所呈现的情况作出相应的参考建议,以期对运动员谌龙在今后的训练有所帮助,并为其他运动员在训练中提供参考建议。通过对谌龙与四名运动员的技术分析以及得分、失分情况做出的详细对比,总结出谌龙在与该四名运动员的比赛中呈现的得分、失分规律特征,发现谌龙在比赛中的优点以及不足,具体有以下几个方面:1.在发球方式以及区域方面,谌龙主要以反手发短球为主,长球为辅,前场1、2号区域较多,后场3、4号区域较少,同时1号与2号区域,3号与4号区域分布不均衡。其余四名运动员发球在1号与2号区域,后场3号与4号区域分布较为均匀。2.在接发球技术方面,运动员谌龙各项技术使用不均衡,前场倾向于使用挑球技术,网前控制意识不强,后场杀球技术未充分发挥,增加接发杀球技术的使用。3.在前场技术运用方面,谌龙与四名运动员前场区域各项技术的使用率高于后场、中场区域。前场区域作为羽毛球比赛中的重要对抗位置,谌龙主要以扑球、搓球为主要得分技术,挑球技术失分率最高,谌龙在前场区域技术运用发挥不稳定,失分率较高。4.谌龙在中场各项技术运用次数最少,主要为挡球、抽球、杀球,杀球作为中场主要得分技术,挡球技术失分率最高。谌龙在中场位置的技术发挥一般,杀球使用次数与其他四名运动员无明显差别。杀球得分上,阿塞尔森明显高于谌龙,抽球得分上,与李宗伟存在一定差距,而挡球得分与失分均高于J-约根森。5.谌龙在后场各项技术运用方面,杀球技术作为主要进攻方式,与吊球技术使用率几乎持平。得分情况上谌龙吊球技术多于林丹、李宗伟,少于J-约根森、阿塞尔森,杀球技术得分多于J-约根森、阿塞尔森,少于林丹、李宗伟。在失分情况上,谌龙的杀球、吊球失分与四名运动员无明显差别。谌龙的后场得分率最高,后场区域的技术运用具有优势。
[Abstract]:This article mainly through the literature material method, the video analysis method, the mathematical statistics method, the comparative analysis method and so on to athlete Chen long and Lin Dan, Li Zongwei J-Jogenson, Aselson 25 matches each technical application statistics through the data contrast analysis. To study the actual performance and technical usage of Chen long in the competition, to find out the advantages and disadvantages of Chen long in the competition, and to make corresponding reference suggestions according to the situation presented by the data. In order to help athletes Chen long in the future training, and to provide other athletes with reference advice in training. Through the technical analysis of Chen long and four athletes, as well as scores, points, points made a detailed comparison, Summing up the characteristics of Chen long's scores and points in the match with the four players, and finding out the advantages and disadvantages of Chen long in the competition, there are the following aspects: 1. In terms of service mode and area, Chen long mainly takes backhand short serve as main ball and long ball as auxiliary. There are more areas 1 and 2 in the front court, less area 3 and 4 in the back court, while the distribution of area 1 and 2 and area 3 and 4 is not balanced. The other four players serve in area 1 and 2, the other four players serve in area 1 and 2. The area distribution of No. 3 and No. 4 in the backcourt is more uniform .2. in receiving and serving technique, the athlete Chen long's use of various techniques is not balanced, the front-court tends to use the pick ball technique, the control consciousness in front of the net is not strong, and the technique of killing the ball in the back court is not fully developed. Increase the use of serve and kill techniques .3. in the use of front-court techniques, Chen long and the four athletes in the front field have a higher utilization rate of various techniques than in the back field. The midfield area. The front area is an important antagonistic position in badminton matches. Chen long's main scoring technique was to catch the ball and rub the ball as the main scoring technique. Chen long lost the most points in the technique of picking the ball. Chen long showed instability in the application of the technique in the front field, and the loss rate was higher. 4. Chen long used the least number of techniques in the midfield, mainly for blocking and pumping. As the main scoring technique in midfield, Chen long has the highest loss rate in blocking technique. Chen long's skill in midfield is generally played, and the number of times used to kill the ball is not significantly different from that of the other four players. Arthelsen was obviously higher than Chen long, and there was a certain gap between the score and Li Zongwei's score, while both the blocking score and the losing point were higher than that of J-Jorgenson .5. Chen long used various techniques in the backcourt, killing the ball as the main attack method. Chen long hanger technique was better than Lin Dan, Li Zongwei, less than J- Jorgenson, Aselson, killing technique score more than J- Jorgenson, Aselson, rather than Lin Dan, in the case of score Chen long hanging ball technique was more than Lin Dan, Li Zongwei, less than J- Jorgenson, Aselson, J- Jogenson, Li Zongwei. In the case of losing points, Chen long's shot and drop were not significantly different from the four players. Chen long's backcourt scoring rate was the highest, and the technical application of the backcourt area had an advantage.
【学位授予单位】：成都体育学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G847

【相似文献】