第29届与第30届奥运会中国男篮进攻战术运用分析

发布时间：2018-03-11 20:50

本文选题：第29、30届奥运会　切入点：进攻战术特征　出处：《北京体育大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本文主要采用文献调查法与录像观察法等研究方法,以第29届与第30届奥运会中国队进攻战术特征为研究对象,通过对中国队在第29届与第30届奥运会上的进攻战术特征进行对比,深入的探讨和思考中国队在两届奥运会中的进攻战术特征,总结并寻找中国队竞技水平下降的原因,同时根据实际情况给出参考建议,为中国队今后的发展提供支持。通过对两届奥运会上的进攻战术特征进行对比得出了以下的结论：1.第30届奥运会中国队快攻战术的发动与接应区域较第29届奥运会更为分散,推进方式与推进路线较第29届奥运会更为集中,而在快攻结束阶段形成人数相等或占优情况明显少于第29届奥运会,创造直接上篮形成一对一进攻得分机会的能力不强,但是篮下强攻次数明显多于第29届奥运会,说明第29届奥运会中国队队员发动快攻更加谨慎,而第30届奥运会中国队队员对于快攻战术的发动更为频繁。2.第29届奥运会中国队抢攻战术使用没有第30届奥运会频繁,但成功率较高,抢攻战术得分比低于第30届奥运会。而第30届奥运会中国队在运用抢攻战术时个人单打独斗太多,内线队员参与抢攻战术较多,但攻击手段部以中远投篮为主,缺少篮下强打,外线队员攻击效率不高,从而导致抢攻战术的得分效率低于第29届奥运会。3.从整体上来看中国队在第29届奥运会的阵地进攻战术运用的成功率要高于第30届奥运会。从个人进攻战术上来看,中国队在第29届奥运会上的成功率要远高于第30届奥运会,第29届奥运会个人进攻区域着重在篮下,而第30届奥运会的个人进攻区域要分布于罚球线以下的篮筐左右两侧。从进攻基础配合上来看,中国队在第29届奥运会上的使用次数要少于多于第30届奥运会,在第29届奥运会上中国队的传切配合与突分配合发动区域均分散于罚球线以上,而第30届奥运会上中国队的传切配合与突分配合发动区域多为禁区弧顶处。在全队整体进攻方面,中国队在第29届奥运会上的运用要多于第30届奥运会；在第29届奥运会上的中国队阵地进攻更加强调全队的整体配合,而在第30届奥运会上中国队的攻击节奏更快,更加注重局部进攻基础配合的运用。在常用战术方面,第29届奥运会上的中国队在发动战术时5号位队员进攻靠近篮下,而4号位队员时常拉到高位伺机进攻；而在第30届奥运会上中国队在发动战术时,5号位与4号位距离篮筐的位置都比较远,1号位持球的时间较长。
[Abstract]:This paper mainly adopts the methods of literature investigation and video observation, taking the attack tactical characteristics of the Chinese team in the 29th and 30th Olympic Games as the research objects. By comparing the offensive tactics of the Chinese team in the 29th Olympic Games and the 30th Olympic Games, the author deeply discusses and ponders the offensive tactical characteristics of the Chinese team in the two Olympic Games, sums up and finds out the reasons for the decline of the Chinese team's competitive level. At the same time, according to the actual situation, the reference suggestions are given. By comparing the characteristics of offensive tactics in the two Olympic Games, the following conclusions can be drawn: 1. In the 30th Olympic Games, the launching and receiving regions of the Chinese fast break tactics are more dispersed than those of the 29th Olympic Games. The way and route of propulsion are more concentrated than those of the 29th Olympic Games, and the number of people forming at the end of fast break is obviously less than that of the 29th Olympic Games, and the ability to create direct layup to form one-to-one attack scoring opportunities is not strong. However, the number of strong attacks under the basket is obviously higher than that of the 29th Olympic Games, indicating that the Chinese team members of the 29th Olympic Games are more cautious in launching the fast break. However, the Chinese team members of the 30th Olympic Games started the fast-break tactics more frequently .2. the 29 th Olympic team used the grabbing tactics less frequently than the 30th Olympic Games, but the success rate was relatively high. The score of the attack tactics was lower than that of the 30th Olympic Games. In the 30th Olympic Games, the Chinese team had too many individual soloists in the use of the strategy of preemptive attack, and the members of the inside line participated in more tactics of the preemptive attack, but the attack means department mainly took the shots of Cosco and lacked the strong play under the basket. The perimeter team is not efficient enough to attack. As a result, the scoring efficiency of the attack strategy is lower than that of the 29th Olympic Games. On the whole, the success rate of the position offensive tactics used by the Chinese team in the 29th Olympic Games is higher than that of the 30th Olympic Games. From the perspective of individual offensive tactics, The success rate of the Chinese team in the 29th Olympic Games was much higher than that in the 30th Olympic Games, where the individual offensive areas of the 29th Olympic Games focused on the basket. The individual offensive areas of the 30th Olympic Games should be distributed on the left and right sides of the basket below the free throw line. From the point of view of the basic offensive cooperation, the Chinese team used fewer times in the 29th Olympic Games than in the 30th Olympic Games. At the 29th Olympic Games, the regions of the Chinese team's cross-cut cooperation and sudden scoring cooperation were scattered above the free throw line. In the 30th Olympic Games, most of the regions started by the Chinese team are the arc-top of the forbidden zone. In the whole attack of the whole team, the use of the Chinese team in the 29th Olympic Games is more than that in the 30th Olympic Games. In the 29th Olympic Games, the Chinese team put more emphasis on the overall cooperation of the whole team, while at the 30th Olympic Games, the Chinese team's attack rhythm was faster, and they paid more attention to the use of local offensive basic cooperation. In terms of common tactics, In the 29th Olympic Games, when the Chinese team launched tactics, the 5th member attacked near the basket, while the 4th member often pulled to the high position to wait for the attack; In the 30th Olympic Games, when the Chinese team started the tactics, position 5 and 4 were far away from the basket, and position 1 had a long time to hold the ball.
【学位授予单位】：北京体育大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：G841

【参考文献】