健身气功选修大学生体育素养评价指标体系构建研究
本文选题:健身气功 切入点:体育素养 出处:《西南大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:本研究基于体育素养、动商理论基础上,结合健身气功运动项目的属性、特点,分析大学生在校阶段应具备的综合素养水平。动商作为新型体育发展的指导框架,其理论模型所包含的内容结合显性与隐性因素为一体进行商数的确定,而体育素养又是在动商基础上为了学生全面提升而演变的综合评价形式,将动商所包含的诸多维度结合体育素养运用在健身气功运动当中,制定出符合当代学校教育考核、测量模式的评价体系是提高学生整体素养的有效手段。本研究基于对动商、体育素养的认知理解,质性与量化相结合,使用Likert五点量表法绘制专家问卷,向十五位专家进行两轮问卷的发放、回收、整理,根据专家建议及研究需要确立出健身气功选修大学生体育素养评价体系的三级指标,根据健身气功选修大学生体育素养评价指标体系编制评价指标重要程度,向十位专家进行发放问卷并回收整理,采用层次分析法(AHP)对健身气功选修大学生体育素养三级指标进行权重的确定,并对其进行一致性检验。在确立三级评价指标及其权重后,依据三级指标进行学生自测量表的设计。研究结果:(1)两轮专家问卷Cronbach's Alpha系数分别为为0.706与0.721,第二轮专家问卷平均值范围为3.7-4.6;标准差范围为0.26-0.52;变异系数范围为0.07-0.12。(2)一级指标权重分别为:体育认知0.0847、体育行为0.2453、体质技能0.4980、日常行为0.1720;二级指标权重分别为:体育知识0.7184、体育意识0.2816、运动参与0.1373、锻炼习惯0.6025、体育道德0.2602、体质水平0.3975、运动技能0.6025、课内0.7101、课外0.2899。(3)十位专家判断矩阵C.I.范围为0-0.0261;C.R.范围为0-0.058;R.I.范围为0-0.9,C.R.均小于0.1。(4)KMO值为0.691,Bartlett=1812,p=0.0000.05;因子分析主成分提取4个公共因子,累积贡献率为56.2%;各维度Cronbach's Alpha值均在0.7-0.8之间。研究结论:(1)健身气功选修大学生体育素养指标体系包括体育认知、体育行为、体质技能、日常行为四个维度9个二级指标、26个三级指标,具有较高专家有效性。(2)健身气功选修大学生体育素养自测量表具有较高的信效度,自测量表有助于教师把握学生个体、总体的体育素养水平、学习内容的掌握程度,同时也展现了学生在先天遗传因素的基础上经过长时间的学习锻炼,体育素养水平有无改变,为教师进一步改进教学内容、形式、方法提供了指导性作用。(3)健身气功选修大学生体育素养测评可直观反映大学生自身特点,对于大学生体质健康水平提高、科学规律锻炼、终身体育意识的形成具有良好的导向作用。
[Abstract]:Based on the theory of sports accomplishment and moving-quotient, combined with the attributes and characteristics of Qigong sports, this paper analyzes the comprehensive literacy level of college students in the school stage, which is the guiding framework for the development of new sports. The content of its theoretical model is combined with the explicit and recessive factors to determine the quotient, and the sports accomplishment is the comprehensive evaluation form which evolves in order to promote the students in an all-round way on the basis of the moving-quotient. This study is based on contrastive quotient, which combines many dimensions of motor quotient with sports accomplishment in fitness qigong exercise, and establishes an evaluation system that accords with contemporary school education examination, and the evaluation system of measuring mode is an effective means to improve students' overall literacy. The cognitive understanding of sports literacy, the combination of quality and quantification, the use of Likert five-point scale method to draw up the expert questionnaire, to 15 experts to issue two rounds of questionnaires, recovery, collation, According to the expert's suggestion and the research need to establish the three level indexes of the physical education literacy evaluation system of the students of fitness qigong elective course, and the important degree of compiling the evaluation index system according to the physical fitness qigong elective college students' sports literacy evaluation index system. The questionnaire was issued to ten experts and collected, and the weight of the three levels of fitness Qigong elective college students was determined by the Analytic hierarchy process (AHP), and the consistency of the three indexes was tested. After the establishment of the three-level evaluation index and its weight, The Cronbach's Alpha coefficient of two rounds of expert questionnaire is 0.706 and 0.721, the average range of the second round of expert questionnaire is 3.7-4.6; the standard deviation range is 0.26-0.52; the range of variation coefficient is 0.07-0.12.42). The second class index weights are: sports cognition 0.0847, physical behavior 0.2453, physical skill 0.4980, daily behavior 0.1720.The second grade index weights are: physical knowledge 0.7184, sports consciousness 0.2816, sports participation 0.1373, exercise habit 0.6025, physical morality 0.2602, physical fitness level 0.3975. Dynamic skills 0.6025, class 0.7101, extracurricular 0.2899.93) Ten expert judgment matrices C.I. range 0-0.0261C. R.range 0-0.058 R.I. range 0-0.908r.KMO < 0.691Bartlett1812p0.0000.05. four common factors were extracted by factor analysis. The cumulative contribution rate is 56.2, and the Cronbach's Alpha values of each dimension are between 0.7-0.8.The research conclusion is that the physical literacy index system of Qigong elective students includes sports cognition, physical behavior and physical skills. The four dimensions of daily behavior are 9 second-class indexes and 26 third-level indexes, which have higher expert effectiveness. 2) the self-test scale of physical accomplishment of college students is of high reliability and validity. The self-test scale is helpful for teachers to grasp students' individual. The overall level of physical education literacy, the degree of mastery of learning content, and at the same time, it also shows whether the level of sports literacy has changed after a long period of study exercise on the basis of innate genetic factors, so as to further improve the teaching contents and forms for teachers. Methods the evaluation of physical literacy of students in Qigong elective course can directly reflect the characteristics of college students, and improve their physique and health level, and exercise them scientifically. The formation of lifelong sports consciousness has a good guiding role.
【学位授予单位】:西南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G852.6-4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 金峰;蔺雪莲;;青少年体育素养研究现状分析[J];四川体育科学;2015年05期
2 Catherine D.Ennis;;Knowledge, transfer, and innovation in physical literacy curricula[J];Journal of Sport and Health Science;2015年02期
3 Suzanne Lundvall;;Physical literacy in the field of physical education——A challenge and a possibility[J];Journal of Sport and Health Science;2015年02期
4 Ang Chen;;Operationalizing physical literacy for learners: Embodying the motivation to move[J];Journal of Sport and Health Science;2015年02期
5 Darla M.Castelli;Jeanne M.Barcelona;Lynne Bryant;;Contextualizing physical literacy in the school environment: The challenges[J];Journal of Sport and Health Science;2015年02期
6 Ang Chen;Haichun Sun;;A great leap of faith: Editorial for JSHS special issue on physical literacy[J];Journal of Sport and Health Science;2015年02期
7 杨献南;鹿志海;;形式逻辑视角下的体育素养概念辨析[J];南京体育学院学报(社会科学版);2015年02期
8 刘少英;;新颖、实用、经典——邱建国著《青少年体育素养培养探究》评介[J];山东社会科学;2015年04期
9 曾雁;;浅析素养与体育素养[J];科技视界;2014年35期
10 付东;;大学生体育态度与体质健康的调查研究及相关性分析[J];北京体育大学学报;2014年06期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 张艳超;中美学生体质测量与评价比较实证研究[D];南京师范大学;2014年
2 陈煦;AHP决策方案集合的构造方法与初选方法研究[D];吉林大学;2006年
,本文编号:1600924
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/tylw/1600924.html