2015年ATP年终排名前四与六至十五名球员得分技术对比研究

发布时间：2018-03-13 15:52

本文选题：男子网球　切入点：男子单打　出处：《宁波大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：2015年,德约科维奇、费德勒、穆雷、瓦林卡ATP排名前四球员获得了四大满贯比赛中的所有冠军,代表男子网坛的最高水平。在网球比赛中,战胜对手夺取胜利的因素很多,这些球员靠什么技术得分战胜对手,靠什么夺取胜利,成为网球比赛中的关键问题,也成为教练和运动员关注的问题。本研究咨询国内网球专家,知名教练,选取2015年ATP年终排名前四位球员与排名第六至十五位球员在四大满贯中全部24场比赛中一发得分、二发得分、接一发得分、接二发得分、第三拍得分、正手得分、反手得分、截击得分、高压得分、切削得分、放小球得分、特殊击球得分技术作为研究对象,观看球员比赛视频,利用SPSS19.0软件进行描述性统计与分析,对排名前四球员与排名第六至十五名球员各项得分技术平均数进行T检验,判定双方在各项技术得分是否有显著性差异,并对前四名与六至十五名球员各项得分技术进行相关性分析,并运用判别函数分析中的逐步判别分析找出前四球员制胜得分技术,得出以下结论:(1)前四名球员在一发得分、二发得分、接一发得分、接二发得分、第三拍得分、正手得分、反手得分、截击得分、高压得分、切削得分、放小球得分、总得分12项技术得分上平均值都要高出六至十五名球员;两组球员一发、第三拍、正手、反手得分皆要高出其他技术得分,其中正手得分要高于反手得分,这说明当今网坛男子职业球员比赛依靠一发和底线正/反手得分,这对我国网球青少年球员日常训练有极大意义。(2)前四名球员与六至十五名球员在反手得分和特殊击球得分两项技术存在显著性差异,在一发得分、接一发得分、第三拍得分、正手得分四项技术存在非常显著性差异,在二发得分、接一发得分、接二发得分、截击得分、高压得分、切削得分、放小球得分六项得分技术上无显著性差异。(3)前四球员与六至十五名球员在反手得分和正手得分,接二发得分与二发得分,正手得分与第三拍得分呈现中度相关,在第三拍得分与接一发得分,第三拍得分与接二发得分,反手得分与第三拍得分,截击得分与接二发得分,切削得分与截击得分为低度相关,特殊球得分与第三拍得分为低度负相关。(4)一发得分技术,接一发得分技术,第三拍得分技术这三项得分技术是所有十二项得分技术中前四名球员与六至十五名球员区别胜负关系影响最大的得分技术,即是本研究的要找的制胜得分技术。
[Abstract]:In 2015, Djokovic, Roger Federer, Murray, and Valinka ATP's top four players won all four Grand Slam titles, representing the highest level in men's tennis. What technical points these players use to win over their opponents and how to win a victory has become a key issue in the tennis match, as well as a concern for coaches and athletes. This study consults domestic tennis experts and famous coaches. In 2015, ATP ranked the top four players and ranked 6th to 15 players in all 24 matches in the four Grand Slam. They scored one, two, one, then two, third, forehand, backhand. Volley score, high pressure score, cutting score, small ball score, special batting score technology as the research object, watching the player game video, using SPSS19.0 software for descriptive statistics and analysis, T-test was performed on the technical average of each score between the top four players and the 6th to 15 players to determine whether there were significant differences in the technical scores between the two sides. The correlation analysis between the top four players and the six to 15 players' scoring techniques is carried out, and by using the stepwise discriminant analysis in the discriminant function analysis, the winning scoring technique of the first four players is found, and the following conclusions are drawn: 1) the first four players score in the first round. Two, one, two, third, forehand, backhand, volley, high-pressure, cutting, small ball, The total scores of 12 techniques were higher than the average of six to 15 players; the players in both groups scored higher than other techniques in one shot, the third shot, the forehand, and the backhand, and the forehand scored higher than the backhand, and the score of the forehand was higher than that of the backhand, and the score of the forehand was higher than that of the backhand. This shows that men's professional players in the tennis world today rely on first and bottom forward / backhand scoring. This is of great significance to the daily training of tennis teenagers in our country.) there are significant differences between the first four players and six to 15 players in backhand scoring and special batting scoring. There is a very significant difference in forehand scoring between the four techniques: second, second, second, intercept, high pressure, cutting, The first four players and six to 15 players scored in backhand and forehand, followed by second and second shots. The forehand score was moderately correlated with the third shot score. In the third shot and the second shot, the third shot and the second shot, the backhand score and the third shot score, the intercept score and the second shot score, the cutting score and the volley score were low, The score of the special ball and the score of the third shot are low negative correlation. The third beat scoring technique is the most influential scoring technique in all 12 scoring techniques, which is the first four players and six to 15 players, which is the winning scoring technique to be found in this study.
【学位授予单位】：宁波大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G845

【相似文献】