三对三篮球执裁理念及执裁方法的思考

发布时间：2018-03-14 19:45

本文选题：三对三篮球执裁　切入点：执裁方法　出处：《体育与科学》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：本文对三对三篮球执裁的理念以及裁判员执裁中站位和移动的方法进行研究。笔者首先通过文献资料法和专家访谈法对三对三篮球运动的理念进行了归纳和总结。之后,笔者筛选出三对三篮球规则中最具代表性的条款,分析三对三篮球规则的目的和理念。最后,综合前两点以及三对三篮球执裁的尺度,将三对三篮球执裁的理念归纳为"以秩序维持者的身份,保证高节奏流畅性的前提下,维护双方球队的竞技利益"。在研究的第二部分中,笔者通过录像观察法,研究目前国际篮联三对三篮球赛的打法、配合特点,并以此为依据探究三对三篮球执裁中选位和移动的方法。最终笔者对执裁方法提出以下两点建议:两人执裁时,追踪裁判应当合理利用"中央裁判"的位置;一人执裁时,裁判员应当在两侧"中央裁判"位置之间移动和选位。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the idea of three to three basketball judgment and the methods of standing and moving in referee's judgment are studied. Firstly, the author sums up and summarizes the idea of three pairs and three basketball by literature and expert interview. The author selects the most representative clauses in the three to three basketball rules, analyzes the purpose and idea of the three to three basketball rules. Finally, synthesizes the criteria of the first two points and the three to three basketball referees. In the second part of the study, the author adopts the method of video observation to maintain the competitive interests of both teams under the premise of maintaining order and ensuring the high rhythm and fluency. This paper studies the current FIBA three-to-three basketball match playing method, cooperates with the characteristic, and takes this as the basis to probe into the method of selecting position and moving in the three-pair three-basketball-holding game. Finally, the author puts forward the following two suggestions to the judgment method: when two people hold the judgment, The position of the "central referee" should be reasonably used by the tracking referee, and the referee should move and select the position between the "central referee" positions on both sides when a person holds the judgment.
【作者单位】：武汉体育学院;
【分类号】：G841

【相似文献】