重来之赛,规则已殆——里约奥运会“重赛风波”的法律思考

发布时间：2018-04-13 06:08

本文选题：奥运会 + 比赛规则　；参考：《法学评论》2017年01期

【摘要】：对里约奥运会上女子4×100米接力赛的"重赛风波",中国队原本可以继续向国际体育仲裁院(CAS)奥运会特别仲裁机构上诉。根据《奥林匹克宪章》、《奥运会仲裁规则》、《国际田联章程》、奥运会参赛报名表,以及CAS奥运会特别仲裁的先例,仲裁庭对赛场裁判纠纷具有管辖权,不受国际田联内部规则"裁判技术事项不可上诉"规定的限制。体育比赛的规则并不享有司法审查的豁免。CAS仲裁庭的审查主要涉及正当程序、是否存在恶意、对比赛规则的解释和适用是否出现了重大错误三个方面。从规则解释适用的文义解释方法、体系解释方法、历史解释方法和目的解释方法来看,国际田联裁判长与裁判仲裁委员会"单独重赛"决定,是对比赛规则的错误解释和适用,CAS仲裁庭可以进行矫正。CAS的仲裁裁决可以继续向瑞士联邦最高法院上诉。国际田联的比赛规则需要进行修改,可以考虑赋予第三方运动员(队)以参加重赛的选择权,来防止再次出现同类纠纷。
[Abstract]:The Chinese team could have appealed the "rerun" of the women's 4 脳 100 meter relay at the Rio Olympics to the International Court of Sports Arbitration (Cass) Olympic special arbitration institution.According to the Olympic Charter, the rules of Arbitration for the Olympic Games, the articles of Association of the International Athletic Federation, the application form for the Olympic Games and the precedents for the special arbitration of the CAS Olympic Games, the arbitral tribunal shall have jurisdiction over disputes over the court decisions.Not subject to the IAAF internal rules, "decisions on technical matters are not subject to appeal" provisions.The rules of sports competition do not enjoy the immunity of judicial review. The review of CAS arbitration tribunal mainly involves due process, whether there is malice, and whether there are significant errors in the interpretation and application of the rules.From the point of view of the interpretation of the rules applicable to the interpretation of the text and meaning, the system of interpretation, the historical interpretation and the purpose of the interpretation, the IAAF referee and the referee's arbitration commission decided to "replay alone",It is the misinterpretation and application of the rules of the match that the arbitral tribunal of CAS may rectify. CAS's arbitral award may continue to appeal to the Swiss Federal Supreme Court.The IAAF rules need to be revised to allow third-party athletes the option to replay to prevent similar disputes.
【作者单位】：苏州大学王健法学院;
【分类号】：G811.21;D997.1

【相似文献】