集群行为的情绪与认知双通路模型在足球球迷暴力行为中的应用与检验

发布时间：2018-04-14 09:38

本文选题：球迷 + 暴力　；参考：《北京体育大学》2015年博士论文

【摘要】：本研究旨在通过访谈法和问卷调查法等研究方法,从集群行为视角探讨足球球迷暴力行为的心理机制,检验集群行为整合理论在足球球迷暴力行为研究中的适用性,并对足球球迷暴力行为的外界触发因素进行分析。通过足球球迷暴力行为研究,论证了目前较受关注的集群行为两种模型的合理性。主要研究结论如下:(1)基于公共评价、与自我联接、相互依赖、行为卷入和认知卷入5维度的足球球迷集体身份认同问卷适合中国足球球迷群体集体身份认同的调查研究。(2)以354名足球球迷为研究参与者的调查研究结果首先支持了van Zomeron与Thomas的双通路观点,球迷暴力行为存在着认知和情绪两条通道。球迷参与暴力行为的心理过程应该既包括集体效能的认知过程,也包括集体愤怒的情绪过程。其次,结果显示无论是集群行为双重路径动力理论模型(DDPMAC)还是集群行为社会认同封存模型(EMSICA)都能够解释球迷暴力的心理过程,特别是球迷温和型暴力行为的心理机制。但是,基于足球球迷群体集体身份认同的相对稳定,群内成员存在着明显的“群内偏好,群外排斥”的特点,DDPMAC模型更适合球迷集群行为研究。(3)以212名足球球迷为研究参与者的调查研究结果表明,愤怒情绪和集体效能对高集体身份认同球迷暴力行为的预测效果并不存在显著性的差异,这与DDPMAC模型并不一致的结果可能源于集体效能水平与集群行为类别之间存在更为复杂的关系。愤怒情绪和集体效能双通路对高集体身份认同球迷的温和型暴力行为具有相似的预测效果,对激烈型暴力行为的预测效果也许会存在差异,即愤怒情绪对激烈型暴力行为具有显著的正向预测,而集体效能对激烈型暴力行为具有显著的负向预测。(4)以100名足球球迷为研究参与者,对裁判因素、客队球员因素、客队球迷因素以及综合因素4个情境下球迷不公正感、愤怒情绪、集体效能、集体身份认同和球迷暴力行为的关系进行了回归分析。结果表明4个情境下球迷不公正感、愤怒情绪、集体效能和集体身份认同能够对球迷暴力行为产生显著的预测效果,特别是温和型暴力行为。
[Abstract]:The purpose of this study is to explore the psychological mechanism of football fans' violent behavior from the perspective of cluster behavior and to test the applicability of the theory of cluster behavior integration in the study of football fans' violent behavior through the methods of interview and questionnaire.And analyzes the external trigger factors of football fans' violent behavior.Based on the study of football fans' violent behavior, the rationality of the two models of cluster behavior is demonstrated.The main conclusions are as follows: 1) based on public evaluation, self-connection, interdependence,The investigation of 5 dimensions of behavioral involvement and cognitive involvement in football fans' collective identity questionnaire for Chinese football fans' collective identity: a survey of 354 football fans as participantsHolding the dual pathway view of van Zomeron and Thomas,There are two channels of cognition and emotion in the violent behavior of fans.The psychological process of fans' participation in violence should include both the cognitive process of collective efficacy and the emotional process of collective anger.Secondly, the results show that both the cluster behavior dual path dynamic model (DDPMACC) and the cluster behavior social identity sealing model (EMSICA) can explain the psychological process of fan violence, especially the psychological mechanism of fan mild violence.However, based on the relative stability of the collective identity of football fans, the members of the group have obvious "intra-group preferences".The characteristic of "out-of-group exclusion" is that DDPMAC model is more suitable for the study of crowd behavior of fans.There was no significant difference in the predictive effects of anger and collective efficacy on the violent behavior of high collective identity fans.The result which is inconsistent with the DDPMAC model may be due to the more complex relationship between the level of collective effectiveness and the cluster behavior category.The two pathways of anger and collective efficacy had similar predictive effects on moderate violent behavior of high group identity fans, and the prediction effects on violent behavior might differ.That is, anger has a significant positive prediction for violent behavior, while collective efficacy has a significant negative prediction for violent behavior.The relationship between the factors of fans' injustice, anger, collective efficacy, collective identity and the violent behavior of fans was analyzed by regression analysis.The results showed that the feelings of injustice, anger, collective efficacy and collective identity could significantly predict the violent behavior of fans, especially moderate violence.
【学位授予单位】：北京体育大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：G804.8

【相似文献】