2014-2015赛季CBA总决赛北京队与辽宁队攻防能力分析

发布时间：2018-04-18 16:00

本文选题：2014—2015赛季 + CBA总决赛　；参考：《太原理工大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：2014—2015赛季CBA联赛己落下帷幕,决赛在北京队和辽宁队之间展开,双方经过激烈的六场角逐,最后北京队以4:2的战绩战胜辽宁队再次举起中国篮球的至尊鼎,也成为CBA历史上第3支成功卫冕的队伍。本文以CBA总决赛北京男篮与辽宁男篮6场比赛数据为研究对象,通过文献资料法、录像观察法、数理统计法,分析两支球员在进攻、防守两方面的技战术表现,更加全面了解北京队取胜的因素和辽宁队失败的原因,为CBA球队提供借鉴。通过研究所得结论如下:1年龄及身体形态指标:年龄、身高、体重、克托莱指数。北京队球员平均年龄29岁,辽宁队25岁,球队平均年龄结果显示:北京队辽宁队,统计学检验结果表明,两支球队年龄差异具有显著性(p0.05)。表明北京队运动员具有年龄上的优势,比赛经验更为丰富,成为他们夺冠的有利条件。通过对两支球队身体形态指标的比较和检验结果可知:球队身高指标显示,北京队辽宁队,北京队在身高方面具有优势;球队体重指标显示:北京队辽宁队,两支球队前锋球员差异具有显著性(P0.05),说明北京队前锋队员在直接身体对抗上优势明显。球队克托莱指数结果显示:北京队辽宁队,两支球队前锋球员差异具有显著性(P0.05)。说明北京队前锋队员身体充实度明显好于辽宁队。2球队进攻指标:场均得分、二分命中率、三分命中率、罚球命中率、进攻篮板、快攻、助攻、失误。通过对两支球队进攻指标的比较和检验结果可知:北京队在得分、不同方式命中率、球队助攻方面表现更加优异,成为他们取胜的关键。辽宁队在前场篮板球上优势明显,争抢意识更加突出。快攻、助攻、失误等进攻指标两支球队差异很小。3球队防守指标:后场篮板、抢断、盖帽、防守犯规。通过对两支球队防守指标的比较和检验结果可知:盖帽、防守犯规指标:北京队优于辽宁队;后场篮板指标:辽宁队优于北京队。数据表明:北京队防守具有身高优势,防守动作规范。辽宁队对于后场篮板的保护更加充分。抢断次数两支球队相同。
[Abstract]:The 2014-2015 CBA league has come to an end. The final was held between Beijing and Liaoning. After six fierce matches, the Beijing team finally lifted up the most important Chinese basketball team again with a 4:2 victory over Liaoning.It also became the third successful defending team in CBA history.This paper takes the data of 6 matches of Beijing Men's Basketball team and Liaoning Men's Basketball team in the CBA Finals as the research object, analyzes the technical and tactical performance of the two players in attacking and defending through the methods of literature, video observation and mathematical statistics.A more comprehensive understanding of the factors that Beijing team won and Liaoning team failure, for the CBA team to provide reference.The conclusions are as follows: age, height, weight, and Ketole index.The average age of Beijing players was 29 years old and Liaoning was 25 years old. The average age of Beijing team Liaoning team showed that there was a significant difference in age between the two teams.The result shows that Beijing athletes have the advantage of age and have more experience in the competition, which is the favorable condition for them to win the championship.By comparing and testing the body shape indexes of the two teams, we can see that the height index of the two teams shows that the Beijing team Liaoning, the Beijing team has an advantage in height, and the weight index of the team shows: Beijing team Liaoning,The difference between the two teams was significant (P 0.05), which indicated that the Beijing strikers had obvious advantages in direct physical confrontation.The results of Ketole index showed that there was a significant difference between the two teams' forward players in Beijing team Liaoning.The results show that the physical fullness of Beijing forward is obviously better than that of Liaoning's second team: average score, two-point hit rate, three-point hit rate, free throw hit rate, offensive rebounding, fast break, assistant attack, error.Through the comparison and test of the two teams' attacking indexes, it can be seen that the Beijing team is more excellent in scoring, shooting rate in different ways and assisting attack, which is the key to their winning.Liaoning in the front-field rebounds obvious advantages, more prominent sense of contention.Fast attack, assists, errors and other offensive indicators the difference between the two teams is very small .3 defensive indicators: backcourt rebounds, steals, blocks, defensive fouls.Through the comparison and test results of the two teams' defense indexes, we can see that: blocking shots, defensive foul index: Beijing team is better than Liaoning team; backcourt rebounding index: Liaoning team is better than Beijing team.The data show: Beijing team defense has height superiority, defense movement norm.Liaoning for the backcourt rebounding protection more fully.The number of steals was the same between the two teams.
【学位授予单位】：太原理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G841

【相似文献】