2015世青赛中国男排与主要对手进攻技战术特点及得失分的对比研究

发布时间：2018-04-29 06:00

本文选题：世青赛 + 技战术　；参考：《西安体育学院》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：2015年9月,第十八届U21世界青年男排锦标赛在墨西哥蒂华纳举行,中国青年队最终获得第三名,这是中国青年队近34年来在世青赛上取得的最好成绩。成绩的取得与运动员刻苦的训练,教练员的指导密不可分,但是纵观本届世青赛中国队进攻技战术和得失分与强队还是有一定的距离。本文主要通过文献资料法、访谈法、数理统计法、录像观察法,对世青赛上与中国队交手的八场比赛进攻技战术及得失分数据为研究对象,进行分析研究,得出如下结论:1.中国队跟其他队的发球技术相同都采用跳飘和大力跳发两种,但是跳飘占得比重比大力跳发球多,世界强队大力跳发占得比重比较多,其次是跳飘。相比于大力跳法,跳飘威力小,冲击力弱,以至于对手容易一传到位率高,很容易组织一攻。中国队在大力跳发球的攻击力上与世界强队还有比较明显的差距。2.在发球落点上中国队在场地中间六号位发球比较多,而世界强队发一号位比较多。发球落点中间位置偏多,是发球技术性能掌握不够熟练的特征,不同区域,不同落点的发球是发球个人战术掌握好坏的重要区别。3.强攻是相比较国外强队,是我们的劣势项目。本次世青赛上当一传不稳定的时候,快攻不能发挥出来,特别是在与冠军俄罗斯比赛中,俄罗斯发球攻击力大,致使我们一传到位率降低,只能依靠4号位和2号位调整强攻的时候,我们的强攻不能挽转局面,不能起到一锤定音的作用,往往不是自身失误就是被对方集体拦死。4.快攻是我们的传统优势技战术,这次世青赛也毫不列外,快攻使用次数最多,得分最多。但是在一传不到位的情况下很难发挥出来,快攻数量的多少很大取决于一传的质量。5.快球掩护下的进攻虽然得分高,但是变化少,容易被对方识破直接拦死。后排进攻运用较少,不能与其他技战术相结合形成准确性,全面性,立体化的进攻体系。6.中国队在与队手整体主动得分相比较发球得分方面要高于对手整体,但是在扣球和拦网两个方面均低于对手整体水平,发球得分方面属于稳定性,在现在拼发球的时代光有稳定性是不够的。发球直接得分能力较弱,扣球和拦网得分与世界强队有这明显的差距。7.中国队与对手整体各项失分相比较,发球、扣球、拦网失分均低于对手整体,但是与冠亚军相比较发球和拦网失分较少,扣球失分比冠亚军多。
[Abstract]:In September 2015, the 18th U21 World Youth Volleyball Championship was held in Tijuana, Mexico, and the Chinese youth team finished third, the best achievement of the Chinese youth team in the World Youth Championships in nearly 34 years. The achievement of the result is closely related to the athletes' hard training and the coach's instruction, but there is still a certain distance between the Chinese team's offensive tactics and winning and losing points and the strong team. This article mainly through the literature material method, the interview method, the mathematical statistics method, the video observation method, carries on the analysis research to the world youth match and the Chinese team eight matches attack technique tactics and the gain and loss score data as the research object, draws the following conclusion: 1. The Chinese team and other teams of the same serve techniques are used to jump floating and strong jump serve, but the proportion is more than strong jump serve, strong teams in the world more than the proportion of strong jump, followed by floatation. Compared with the strong jump method, jump floating power is small, the impact is weak, so that the opponent is easy to pass a high rate, easy to organize an attack. There is still a clear gap between the Chinese team and the world's top teams in terms of the attacking power of the strong jump serve. The Chinese team served more in the sixth position in the middle of the court, while the world strong teams served more in the first place. There are many middle positions in the middle of the serve point, which is the characteristic that the technical performance of the service is not skilled enough. The important difference between the service individual tactics and the quality of the serve is different from the service in different regions and different landing points. The strong attack is compared with the foreign strong team, is our inferiority item. In this World Youth Championship, when the first pass was unstable, the fast break could not play out, especially in the match against the champion Russia, Russia served a lot of attack, resulting in our passing rate reduced. When we can only rely on the 4th and 2nd positions to adjust our strong attack, our strong attack can not pull the situation, can not play a fixed role, often either their own mistakes or the collective blocking of the other side. 4. Fast break is our traditional advantage technique and tactics, this world youth game is not out of the list, fast break use the most times, score the most. But in the case of one pass is difficult to play out, the number of fast breaks depends heavily on the quality of the first pass. 5. Fast-ball cover of the attack although high, but little change, easy to be directly blocked by the other side. The rear row attack uses less, cannot combine with the other technical tactics to form the accuracy, the comprehensiveness, the three-dimensional attack system. 6. Compared with the overall initiative score of the team players, the Chinese team scored higher in serving than the opponents as a whole, but both in spiking and blocking were lower than the overall level of the opponents, and the serve scores were stable. It is not enough to have stability in the age of serving. Serve direct scoring ability is weak, spiking and blocking scoring with the world's strong teams have this obvious gap. 7. The Chinese team compared with the opponent as a whole, serving, spiking, blocking points are lower than the whole opponent, but compared with the crown and second place, serve and block loss points are less, more spikes than the crown and runner-up.
【学位授予单位】：西安体育学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G842

【相似文献】