当前位置:主页 > 教育论文 > 体育论文 >

幼儿灵敏、协调能力评价方法的研究

发布时间:2018-04-30 19:29

  本文选题:幼儿 + 灵敏性 ; 参考:《北京体育大学》2015年硕士论文


【摘要】:目的本研究依据对灵敏、协调能力的理论研究基础以及幼儿形态学特点和认知能力发展水平,运用动作发展的观点、生物学测试以及运动学分析的方法,创新地提出评价幼儿灵敏、协调能力各个方面的方法,以期能客观全面的评价幼儿灵敏、协调能力,为幼儿灵敏、协调能力评价提供科学支撑。方法运用动作发展的观点、生物学测试以及运动学分析的方法,对现有灵敏、协调能力测试方法进行改良;在对国外动作发展评价方法进行研究的基础上,提出可量化的适合我国幼儿群体测试的手眼协调方法;在对成人身体移动与变换能力测试方法研究的基础上,对其进行迁移和简化应用于幼儿群体,并创新地提出评价幼儿灵敏、协调能力的综合评价方法。在4-6岁幼儿中进行各评价方法的测试,对测试结果进行效果分析;并运用二维平面解析技术对改良双脚连续跳方法进行运动学参数采集与分析。结果随着年龄的增加双脚连续跳的成绩也越好,而采用60cm间距双脚连续跳时成绩明显优于50cm和70cm两个间距,改良后的双脚连续跳具有较好的年龄敏感性。临摹图形、穿珠子和穿鞋带等手眼协调能力测试方法均能反映出很好的对年龄的敏感性,而串珠子存在显著的男孩和女孩的差异。身体移动与变换能力测试方法中,十字象限跳具有最好的年龄区分性。综合评价方法可以综合全面的评价幼儿灵敏、协调能力。结论1.本文改良的双脚连续跳测试方法在4.5-6.5岁幼儿中具有较好的普适性,4.5-6.5岁幼儿宜选用60cm间距双脚连续跳进行测试。2.评价幼儿手眼协调能力单项测试方法中串珠子是较好的评价方法。评价幼儿身体移动与变换能力时,可选用十字象限跳、折线跑和三点移动的方法,三种方法均具有较好的普适性。3.本研究设计的综合评价路径可以较为全面的反应幼儿在灵敏、协调能力上的综合表现,条件允许时推荐使用该方法进行幼儿灵敏.协调能力的评价。4.在对幼儿灵敏、协调能力进行深入全面研究时,应选用本文中的综合评价方法进行;若需要对灵敏、协调能力中的某一方面进行着重考察时,可选取相应的单项评价方法。
[Abstract]:Objective this study was based on the theoretical study of sensitivity and coordination ability, morphological characteristics and cognitive development level of young children, and applied the viewpoint of motor development, biological testing and kinematics analysis methods. In order to evaluate the children's sensitivity and coordination ability objectively and comprehensively, this paper puts forward the methods of evaluating children's sensitivity and coordination ability in order to provide scientific support for the evaluation of children's sensitivity and coordination ability. Methods based on the viewpoint of movement development, biological test and kinematics analysis, the existing methods of sensitivity and coordination ability were improved, and the evaluation methods of motion development abroad were studied. This paper presents a quantifiable hand-eye coordination method suitable for Chinese infant group testing, and based on the research of adult body movement and transformation ability test method, it is transferred and simplified and applied to young children group. And innovatively put forward the comprehensive evaluation method of evaluating children's sensitivity and coordination ability. The evaluation methods were tested in children aged 4-6 years, and the results were analyzed, and the kinematics parameters of the improved method were collected and analyzed by two-dimensional plane analysis technique. Results with the increase of age, the results of the continuous jump were better, and the results of the continuous jump with 60cm spacing were better than those of 50cm and 70cm. The modified step continuous jump had better age sensitivity. The test methods of hand-eye coordination ability, such as copying figure, wearing bead and wearing shoelace, can all reflect the good sensitivity to age, but there are significant differences between boys and girls in string beads. Cross quadrant jumping is the best age-distinguishing method in body mobility and transformation capability testing. Comprehensive evaluation method can comprehensively evaluate children's sensitivity and coordination ability. Conclusion 1. In this paper, the improved test method of feet continuous jump in children aged 4.5-6.5 years is better than that of children aged 4.5-6.5 years. It is advisable for children aged 4.5-6.5 years to choose 60cm distance feet continuous jump to test. 2. In the single test method of children's hand-eye coordination ability, bead string is a better evaluation method. The methods of cross quadrant jump, broken line running and three point movement can be used to evaluate the ability of children's body movement and transformation. The three methods have good universality. 3. The comprehensive evaluation path designed in this study can comprehensively reflect the comprehensive performance of children in sensitivity and coordination ability, and it is recommended to use this method for children sensitivity when conditions permit. Evaluation of coordination capacity .4. The comprehensive evaluation method in this paper should be used when the children are sensitive and coordination ability, and if it is necessary to focus on one aspect of the sensitivity and coordination ability, the corresponding single evaluation method can be selected.
【学位授予单位】:北京体育大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:G804.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前8条

1 柴娇;李林;;《国家学生体质健康标准》中“灵敏素质”测试指标完善研究[J];北京体育大学学报;2012年06期

2 侯斌,于新;对儿童少年下肢活动协调能力的动态研究[J];华中师范大学学报(自然科学版);2003年04期

3 葛春林,陈忠和;排球专项灵敏素质的研究现状及其训练方法[J];上海体育学院学报;1997年02期

4 潘力平;篮球专项灵敏素质的特征及其研究现状[J];山东体育学院学报;2000年03期

5 许崇高,严波涛;动作协调能力属性及其相关定义的理论思考[J];西安体育学院学报;1999年03期

6 徐政;7—12岁儿童动作协调能力测量评价系统的研究[J];西安体育学院学报;2002年01期

7 张云;;3-6岁儿童动作协调能力测试方法与发展特征问题的探讨[J];西安体育学院学报;2010年05期

8 潘泰陶;7~12岁儿童动作协调能力性别差异的研究[J];中国体育科技;2002年11期

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 孟国正;高水平排球运动员运动情境中决策行为的脑神经机制研究[D];北京体育大学;2011年



本文编号:1825872

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/tylw/1825872.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户e8fd7***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com