(2017-2020)周期竞技健美操规则变化及对成套动作创编的影响研究
本文选题:(2017-2020)周期 + 竞技健美操 ; 参考:《安徽师范大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:随着竞技健美操技术水平的发展,竞赛规则也以每4年一个周期不断地变化。本文采用文献资料、对比分析、逻辑分析、数理统计等研究方法对(2017-2020)新周期竞赛规则进行梳理分析,以期发现新规则下竞技健美操成套动作创编的有效应对策略,最终为新周期内的成套动作创编提供理论参考。研究表明:(1)(2017-2020)周期新规则较前几周期规则而言,主要变化有:有氧舞蹈和有氧踏板竞赛规则发生了显著的变化;所有项目成套动作的时间都缩短为1′20″±5″;所有项目成套动作中的难度动作必须选自于规则难度表中的任意三个组别,每个组别至少一个,混双、三人操和集体五人操难度动作数量减少为9个,重新调整了难度动作根命名,较少了81个0.1-0.7分的低分值难度动作,增加了28个0.8-1.0分的高分值难度动作;允许2到3个不同根命组的难度动作组合,允许1个或多于1个难度动作与技巧动作的组合,且所有难度动作都达到最低完成标准时,可获得0.1或0.2的连接分;集体性项目中的托举动作由原来的2次减少为1次,艺术评分重新调整为10个评分点,但涵盖内容有所增加。(2)在有氧舞蹈方面,(2017-2020)周期规则重新规定运动员必须要以舞蹈的形式完成健美操的成套动作且动作中必须包括4-8个八拍的街舞动作作为第二种风格元素,成套动作中允许使用难度或技巧动作,但不赋予分值;在有氧踏板方面,(2017-2020)周期新规则改变了上一周期的成套动作可以使用难度表中的难度动作,且必须出现一次托举动作,而重新规定为在有氧踏板的成套动作中不准许出现任何难度或技巧动作,可以有一次托举动作的展示,但没有分值。(3)成套动作时间缩短,操化动作数量也随之减少,首先,要想充分的突出主体风格,就要紧扣音乐主题;其次,成套动作的运动强度增加,要精简动作素材,合理分配成套动作内容。(4)缩小了难度动作的选择范围,减少了集体项目成套动作的难度数量,重新调整了难度动作根命名,减少了81个低分值难度动作,增加了28个高分值难度动作,愈发突出竞技健美操的个性化特点,扩大了运动员对高分值难度动作的选择空间,同时也对运动员的身体素质、技能水平以及心理素质提高了要求。(5)新规则允许2到3个不同根命组的难度动作组合,允许1个或多于1个难度动作与技巧动作的组合,且所有难度动作都达到最低完成标准时,可获得0.1或0.2的连接分。为运动员获得更多的连接分创造了有利条件,提高了成套动作的观赏性和竞技性,与此同时也对运动员自身的竞技能力提出了更高的要求。(6)艺术评分重新调整为10个评分点,集体性项目中的托举动作由原来的2次减少为1次,且为动力性、站立式托举。教练员和运动员在进行创编过程中,要力争每一个细节的完美,以求最大限度的表现成套动作的艺术水准。
[Abstract]:With the development of competitive aerobics technology, competition rules change every four years. In this paper, by using the methods of literature, comparative analysis, logic analysis, mathematical statistics and other research methods, the author combs and analyzes the competition rules of the new cycle (2017-2020), in order to find out the effective coping strategies for the creation of competitive aerobics' complete sets of movements under the new rules. Finally, it provides a theoretical reference for the complete set of motion creation in the new cycle. The results show that the main changes of the new cycle rules are as follows: the aerobic dance and the aerobic pedal competition rules have changed significantly, and the time of the complete set of exercises in all events has been shortened to 1 20 "卤5", and the main changes of the new cycle rules are as follows: (1) in the first few cycles, the main changes are: aerobic dance and aerobic pedal competition rules have changed significantly; The difficulty actions in all event sets must be selected from any of the three groups in the regular difficulty table, with at least one in each group, and the number of difficulty movements in mixed doubles, three-person exercises and collective five-person exercises has been reduced to nine. Rescheduled the root name of the difficulty action, less 81 low score difficulty actions with 0.1-0.7 scores, increased 28 high score difficulty actions with 0.8-1.0 points, allowed 2 to 3 difficulty action combinations of different root groups, Allows a combination of one or more difficult and skillful movements, and when all the difficulty movements reach the minimum completion standard, a connection score of 0.1 or 0.2 is obtained; the number of lifting actions in a collective project is reduced from 2 to 1, The art score was readjusted to 10 points, But there is an increase in coverage. 2) in aerobic dance, the cycle rules re-stipulate that athletes must complete aerobics sets in the form of dance and must include 4-8 racquettes as a second style element. Difficulty or skill movements are allowed in sets, but no scores are assigned; the new cycle rules for aerobic pedals change the difficulty movement in the previous cycle and must occur once. The re-regulation is that no difficulty or skill movement is allowed in the aerobic pedal set, but there can be a display of the lifting action, but there is no score. 3) the complete set action time is shortened, and the number of exercises is reduced. First of all, In order to fully highlight the main body style, we should stick to the theme of music; secondly, the intensity of the movement of the complete set of movements is increased, the material of the action should be streamlined, and the content of the complete set of movements. 4) has narrowed down the scope of choice of the difficult movements. It reduces the number of difficulty of collective events, readjusts the naming of difficulty movement root, reduces 81 low score difficulty movements, increases 28 high score difficulty movements, and highlights the individualized characteristics of competitive aerobics. At the same time, the new rules allow 2 to 3 different groups of difficult movements to be combined with physical quality, skill level and psychological quality. Allows a combination of one or more difficulty and skill movements, and gets 0.1 or 0.2 connection points when all difficulty actions reach the minimum completion standard. It creates favorable conditions for athletes to obtain more connecting points, improves the appreciation and competition of complete sets of movements, and at the same time puts forward higher requirements for the athletes' own competitive ability.) the art score is readjusted to 10 scoring points. Collective items in the lifting action from the original 2 to 1, and for the dynamic, standing lift. Coaches and athletes should strive for the perfection of every detail in the process of creation, in order to maximize the performance of the artistic level of the complete set of movements.
【学位授予单位】:安徽师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G831.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 庞尧;;FIG2013-2016年竞技健美操竞赛规则的变化分析[J];湖北体育科技;2014年03期
2 李停停;曹司雨;孙耀;;近三版FIG竞技健美操规则的比较研究[J];南京体育学院学报(社会科学版);2013年03期
3 张中印;马凌波;周燕;熊德良;秦勇;;我国高校竞技健美操男单成套难度动作分析[J];哈尔滨体育学院学报;2013年02期
4 周建社;周鑫;;论竞技健美操操化动作的创新的实例分析——以新规则前后两届世锦赛三人操为例[J];体育科技文献通报;2012年11期
5 李春璐;;竞技健美操难度动作规则变化分析[J];华章;2012年27期
6 查春华;;竞技健美操六人项目托举编排及设计研究[J];中国体育科技;2012年04期
7 宋波;张卓;;我国竞技健美操混双项目难度动作现状与发展趋势[J];沈阳体育学院学报;2012年01期
8 李先雄;杨芳;李艳翎;;2010年世界健美操锦标赛男单项目过渡与连接动作分析[J];北京体育大学学报;2011年12期
9 宋波;周丹;;对我国竞技健美操混合双人成套操化动作的探究[J];广州体育学院学报;2011年06期
10 窦丹;张小龙;刁在箴;;中外优秀健美操混双运动员难度动作的对比研究[J];广州体育学院学报;2011年05期
相关硕士学位论文 前9条
1 刘清;2013-2016版FIG新规则的变化分析及新周期我国竞技健美操难度动作发展的启示[D];华中师范大学;2013年
2 李丽;规则变化对竞技健美操成套动作编排的影响及对策研究[D];西安体育学院;2013年
3 罗明辉;新周期健美操竞赛规则变化对竞技健美操比赛成绩的影响[D];赣南师范学院;2012年
4 高冬利;从近三周期规则演变看竞技健美操难度动作发展趋势[D];辽宁师范大学;2012年
5 贺田田;新规则导向下竞技健美操集体三人项目成套动作艺术编排的研究[D];上海师范大学;2012年
6 王倩倩;规则变化下对竞技健美操三人项目成套动作编排的研究[D];山东师范大学;2011年
7 杨鹏;2009-2012新规则下竞技健美操女单决赛成套动作编排特点分析[D];江西师范大学;2011年
8 赵燕;规则导向下竞技健美操集体项目成套动作编排的研究[D];华中师范大学;2007年
9 吕春双;对FIG竞技健美操新规则的变化及其发展趋势的研究[D];东北师范大学;2006年
,本文编号:1871359
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/tylw/1871359.html