我国初级游泳救生员考核标准及评价体系实施现状的研究
本文选题:初级游泳救生员 + 考核标准 ; 参考:《广州体育学院》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:随着我国大众游泳的开展,游泳人群随之增加,但溺水事故也时有发生,因而游泳救生员这个行业受到越来越多的关注。经营性游泳场馆的救生员配置,往往在医务人员带来之前对溺水者有着重要的生存意义。初级游泳救生员工作在最基层,并处于救生事业第一线,且是考评量最大的救生员级别。初级游泳救生员考核标准决定了游泳救生员最基本的技能基础,救生员掌握的救生技能决定救生水平,救生员考评标准和内容决定了培养的救生员质量,只有了解了救生员真正需要的技能,进一步规范救生员考核内容和考评体系,才能培养出高标准、适合需求的游泳救生员。本文采用文献资料法、问卷调查法、专家访谈法、数理统计法、逻辑分析法等科学研究方法,对我国初级游泳救生员的技能需求、考评标准和考评体系进行调查分析,客观的反应了救生员技能需求和考评标准、体系的实施现状,并借鉴其他国家和地区经验,结合我国国情,为救生员的培训和考核标准、体系提出相关发展对策。本文的主要研究内容与结果如下:1.现行的我国初级游泳救生员考试游泳技能达标以及水上赴救考核标准及内容总体呈难度偏易和内容较少的现象。初级救生员只是掌握了较简单、表面的技能和知识,技能结构单一,培训单位及考核要求都忽略救生员的培养质量,达不到目前游泳场馆对初级游泳救生员实际技能的需求。2.上水赴救以及解脱考核的扣分标准不完善,影响扣分的两大主要因素:救生行为的大标准和救生行为细节界定不清楚。导致救生员考评员在拖带,上岸,现场急救等救生现象上出现扣分的分歧,产生误差。3.目前考核工作的评价体系存在缺点,省级职业技能鉴定部门缺少对考评员考评资格管理的权利。考评工作中容易出现没有考前会议而导致考核准备不足、缺乏统一原则,考后未及时汇报工作导致救生争议现象不断出现,一次考评量过大,部分救生考评员不经常参加考评员继续教育培训而导致业务水平下降等现象出现。
[Abstract]:With the development of popular swimming in China, the swimming crowd increases, but drowning accidents also occur from time to time, so swimming lifeguards are paid more and more attention. The allocation of lifeguards in commercial swimming stadiums is often of great significance to the drowning before the medical staff bring them. The primary swimmer works at the lowest level, and is in the front line of life-saving career, and is the most rated lifeguard grade. The assessment standard of primary swimming lifeguard determines the most basic skill base of the swimmer, the life saving skill mastered by the lifeguard determines the life saving level, and the standard and content of the lifeguard evaluation determine the quality of the lifeguard trained. Only by understanding the skills that lifeguards really need and further standardizing the contents and evaluation system of lifeguards can we cultivate a high standard and suitable swimming lifeguards. Based on the methods of literature, questionnaire, expert interview, mathematical statistics and logic analysis, this paper investigates and analyzes the skill requirements, evaluation standards and evaluation system of primary swimming lifeguards in China. It objectively reflects the requirements of lifeguards' skills and evaluation standards, the implementation status of the system, and draw lessons from the experience of other countries and regions, combined with the national conditions of our country, for the lifeguard training and assessment standards, the system put forward relevant development countermeasures. The main contents and results of this paper are as follows: 1. The current swimming skills of primary swimming lifeguards in China are up to standard, and the standards and contents of water rescue assessment are relatively difficult and less. The primary lifeguard only grasps the relatively simple, the superficial skill and the knowledge, the skill structure is single, the training unit and the examination request all ignore the lifeguard's training quality, does not reach the present swimming stadium to the primary swimming lifeguard actual skill demand .2. The standard of deduction for rescue and release assessment in Sheung Shui is not perfect, and the two main factors that affect the score are not clear: the big standard of life-saving behavior and the definition of details of life-saving behavior. Lead to lifeguard examiners in towing, disembarkation, on-site emergency rescue phenomena such as points on the difference between points, error. 3. At present, there are shortcomings in the evaluation system of the appraisal work, and the provincial vocational skill appraisal department lacks the right to manage the examiner's qualification. In the evaluation work, it is easy to have no meeting before the examination, which leads to inadequate preparation for examination, lack of unified principles, failure to report the work in time after the examination, which leads to the emergence of life-saving controversy phenomenon, and the amount of assessment is too large at one time. Some life-saving examiners do not often participate in the continuing education and training of examiners, which leads to the decline of professional level and so on.
【学位授予单位】:广州体育学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G861.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 孙新锋;;我国游泳救生员职业技能鉴定状况研究[J];吉林工程技术师范学院学报;2015年08期
2 王朝军;王晓贞;纵凤侠;;我国体育行业特有职业技能鉴定研究[J];北京体育大学学报;2014年12期
3 易军;唐清安;;重庆市体育行业特有职业技能鉴定现状分析[J];体育成人教育学刊;2013年03期
4 王晓贞;;我国体育行业国家职业资格证书特征、实施环境及问题[J];首都体育学院学报;2013年01期
5 王晓贞;玄延军;;江苏省体育行业特有职业技能鉴定现状与发展策略研究[J];中国体育科技;2010年05期
6 申勇;王丽娜;;各有千秋的国外水上救生活动[J];游泳;2010年02期
7 刘博;;高校游泳馆救生员管理[J];继续教育研究;2009年07期
8 李慧玲;;构建学校游泳课安全保障体系的相关问题研究[J];浙江体育科学;2008年06期
9 刘建立;;体育竞赛中主观评分的概念、内涵及其评判特征研究[J];体育与科学;2008年03期
10 方千华;梅雪雄;;国内外大众游泳救生员培养体制的比较研究[J];首都体育学院学报;2008年03期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 兰丽;室内环境对人员工作效率影响机理与评价研究[D];上海交通大学;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 田浩;湖南省游泳救生员培养现状与对策分析[D];湖南科技大学;2013年
2 张荣存;评分类体育项目裁判员临场执法水平评价的研究[D];北京体育大学;2007年
,本文编号:1901172
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/tylw/1901172.html