北京市海淀区少儿游泳培训机构针对初学者培训模式的调查研究

发布时间：2018-06-08 15:42

本文选题：海淀区 + 少儿游泳　；参考：《北京体育大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：改革开放后随着大家生活水平的提高,人们参与游泳运动的人也越来越多,随之而来的各种游泳培训机构也如雨后春笋一样蓬勃发展起来,但是这些培训机构有什么异同?各具备哪些特点?其中有哪些经营管理模式?是本文要研究的主要问题。本文采用文献资料法、专家访谈法、实地考察法、问卷调查法、数理统计法,通过对北京市海淀区少儿游泳培训机构经营管理模式进行了系统深入的研究。通过文献资料法检索大量的文献资料得出现阶段关于游泳培训模式大致可分为依附学校的培训模式和依附于社会场馆的游泳培训模式两大类。这两种模式均由(1)培训机构的环境因素(2)培训的参与者因素(3)培训的运营管理因素三个维度构成。本文针对这两种模式的三种构成因素的分析研究得出以下结论:1.在环境因素中,依附于学校的培训模式泳池大、场地宽,而依附于社会场馆培训模式场地小、泳池窄。依附于学校培训模式总体水质卫生标准高于依附于社会场馆的培训模式,水温则依附于学校的培训模式低于社会培训模式。这两项指标的达标率依附于社会场馆的达标率为67%,而依附于学校培训模式均达到国家标准,教学场地两种模式各有千秋。2.在参与人员因素中两种培训模式学员年龄都集中在6—7岁阶段,男女比例大致为男55%、女45%,均没有明显差别。学校培训模式学员人数较多,社会培训模式学员人数较少。对于教练员则依附于学校的培训模式更注重教练员的能力,而依附于社会场馆的培训模式更看重教练员的年轻化。3.培训机构的运营管理机制,依附于学校的培训机构的培训模式教学秩序比较正规、管理比较严格、守信誉、质量有保障、规模较大,而依附于社会场馆的培训机构的培训模式则经营管理方式比较灵活、但人比较少、教学质量有时没有保障、收费标准都比较混乱,主要根据自身环境的优劣而定。4.两种培训模式教学目标都没有统一标准,依附于学校培训机构的培训模式多以较专业的训练为主,而依附于社会场馆培训机构的培训模式多以锻炼身体为主。
[Abstract]:After the reform and opening up, with the improvement of people's living standards, more and more people participate in swimming, and the various swimming training institutions are booming, but what are the similarities and differences of these training institutions? What are the characteristics of each? What are the management modes? It is the main problem to be studied in this paper. In this paper, the management model of children's swimming training institutions in Haidian District of Beijing is studied systematically and deeply by the methods of literature, expert interview, field investigation, questionnaire investigation and mathematical statistics. By searching a large number of documents, it can be concluded that the current swimming training model can be divided into two categories: the dependent school training model and the social gymnasium dependent swimming training model. The two models are composed of three dimensions: 1) the environmental factors of the training institutions (2) the participants in the training and 3) the operational management factors of the training. Based on the analysis of the three components of these two models, this paper draws the following conclusion: 1. Among the environmental factors, the training mode attached to the school is large and wide, while the training mode is small and the pool is narrow. The overall water quality and sanitation standard of the school training model is higher than that of the social stadium training model, while the water temperature dependent training model is lower than the social training model. The compliance rate of these two indicators is 67% for social stadiums, and 67% for school training models, and the two teaching sites have their own strengths. 2. In the factors of participants, the age of the two training models is concentrated in the age of 6-7 years, and the ratio of male to female is about 55 and 45 respectively, and there is no significant difference between them. The number of students in the school training model is more than that in the social training model. For the coaches, the training model attached to the school pays more attention to the ability of the coaches, while the training model dependent on the social stadiums pays more attention to the younger age of the coaches. The operation and management mechanism of the training institutions, the training mode of the training institutions dependent on the school is more formal, the management is relatively strict, the credibility is observed, the quality is guaranteed, and the scale is large. However, the training mode of the training institutions attached to the social stadiums is more flexible, but the number of people is relatively small, the teaching quality is sometimes not guaranteed, and the charging standards are relatively chaotic, mainly according to the advantages and disadvantages of their own environment. There is no uniform standard for the two training models. The training models attached to the school training institutions are mainly professional training, while the training models dependent on the social venues training institutions are mostly physical exercise.
【学位授予单位】：北京体育大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G861.1

【相似文献】