第13、14届世界健美操锦标赛中外混双项目成套动作编排研究

发布时间：2018-06-28 01:18

本文选题：第13、14届世界健美操锦标赛 + 混双项目　；参考：《曲阜师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着竞技健美操运动的不断发展,各国家队运动员技术水平不断提高,竞争更加激烈。2014年第13届世界健美操锦标赛中,中国队在混双项目上获得了第四名,在2016年第14届世界健美操锦标赛中,中国队取得历史性突破,在混双项目上获得了第三名。为了更好的促进我国竞技健美操混双项目的发展,本文结合FIG2013版竞技健美操竞赛规则,以第13、14届世界健美操锦标赛混双项目中国队与前三名运动队共七套成套动作为研究对象,运用文献资料法、录像观察法、对比分析法和数理统计法,对第13、14届世界健美操锦标赛混双项目中国队与前三名运动队的比赛成绩、动作创编和完成情况进行了对比分析,以期找出中国队的优势和劣势,为我国混双项目的发展提供一定的理论支持。研究结果表明:1、第14届世界健美操锦标赛混双项目整体实力高于第13届,中国队的整体实力有所增强,在创编中能够选择高分值的难度动作,但是成套动作编排的艺术分值较低。2、两届世锦赛中除匈牙利队以外在难度选择上都采用“2-1-5-2”的模式,B组难度数量少,难度动作组别严重失衡。第14届世界健美操锦标赛中各个国家队难度数量时间段分布更加趋向于均衡,难度动作分值普遍提高,中国队选择的难度分值最高。3、第13届世界健美操锦标赛各国家队都采用了1个难度组别为C+A的难度组合,第14届世锦赛中意大利队、匈牙利队都采用了两次组合难度,中国队只有一次,中国队在难度组合数量上处于劣势。4、两届世锦赛中,各国家队空间转换次数变化不大,次数最多为18次,中国队成套动作创编中操化动作单元数量相对较少,空间转换类型过于集中,空间转换和移动路线的次数有所增加,但与强国相比差距比较明显。5、第13届世锦赛中罗马尼亚两次托举采用了三个类型的动作组合,动作复杂,富有创新性。第14届世锦赛中意大利队和中国队采用两次复合性托举动作,中国队的托举动作缺少动作创新,主要以翻转类和转体类的结合为主。中国队在14届世锦赛中的成套动作较13届世锦赛有所创新,在艺术表现力上与欧洲运动员还有一定差距。
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of competitive aerobics, the technical level of national team athletes has been improved and the competition has become more fierce. In the 2014 13th World Aerobics Championships, China won fourth place in mixed doubles. At the 14th World Aerobics Championships in 2016, China made a historic breakthrough and finished third in mixed doubles. In order to promote the development of competitive aerobics mixed doubles events in China, this paper, in combination with the FIG2013 edition competitive aerobics competition rules, takes the Chinese team and the top three sports teams as the research objects, taking the mixed doubles event of the 14th World Aerobics Championships as the research object. By using the methods of documentary data, video observation, comparative analysis and mathematical statistics, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the performance, movement creation and completion of the Chinese team and the top three sports teams in the mixed doubles of the 14th World Aerobics Championships. In order to find out the strengths and weaknesses of the Chinese team, and provide some theoretical support for the development of mixed doubles in China. The research results show that the overall strength of the 14th World Aerobics Championships is higher than that of the 13th World Aerobics Championships, and the overall strength of the Chinese team has been enhanced. But the artistic score of complete set movement arrangement is low. In the two world championships, except Hungary team, the difficulty selection of group B is less than that of "2-1-5-2" mode, and the difficulty action group is seriously out of balance. In the 14th World Aerobics Championships, the distribution of the number of difficulty periods of each national team tends to be more balanced, and the score of difficulty movements generally increases. The Chinese team chose the highest score of difficulty. 3. Each national team of the 13th World Aerobics Championships adopted a difficulty group C A, while Italy and Hungary adopted two combinations of difficulty in the 14th World Championships. The Chinese team has only one time, the Chinese team is at a disadvantage in the number of difficulty combinations. In the two world championships, the number of space conversion of each national team is not changed much, the number of the most is 18, and the number of the operational action units in the Chinese complete set of motion creation is relatively small. The space conversion type is too concentrated, the frequency of space conversion and mobile route has increased, but compared with the powerful country, the gap is obvious. 5. In the 13th world championships, Romania adopted three types of movement combination, and the movement is complicated. Innovative. In the 14th World Championships, Italy and China adopted two complex lifting movements, and the Chinese team lacked movement innovation, mainly the combination of turnover and rotation. The Chinese team in the 14th World Championship sets of movements than the 13th World Championship innovation, in terms of artistic performance and European athletes still have a certain gap.
【学位授予单位】：曲阜师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G831.3

【参考文献】