欧美体育社会学研究中的作者、机构及合作特征

发布时间：2018-06-29 01:34

本文选题：体育文献计量 + 作者　；参考：《体育学刊》2017年06期

【摘要】：以刊载于《国际体育社会学评论》《体育社会学杂志》《体育与社会问题杂志》且被SSCI数据库收录的682篇论文为研究样本,运用三角互证法、网络分析法和比较分析法,探讨欧美体育社会学研究中作者、机构及科研合作特征。结果表明,欧洲体育社会学研究存在女性"科研产出之谜",男性、中级职称作者比例高于北美,但北美博士及高级职称作者比例略高于欧洲,且两地均涌现出一批高产的核心作者。在作者科研合作方面,北美作者具有更多科研合作经历,形成密度相对较高的合作网络和数量较多的研究团队。在科研机构方面,欧洲作者主要来自高等院校,而北美作者所在高校的2级科研机构类型相对多元,并形成一批高产和处于科研合作网络中心的研究机构,北美机构合作网络密度也高于欧洲且具有更多的国际合作。
[Abstract]:Taking the 682 papers published in the Journal of Sports Sociology and Sports Sociology and included in the SSCI database as research samples, the triangular cross-proving method, the network analysis method and the comparative analysis method were used. This paper discusses the characteristics of authors, institutions and scientific research cooperation in sports sociology research in Europe and America. The results show that there is a "mystery of scientific research output" among women in sports sociology research in Europe. The proportion of male and middle title authors is higher than that of North America, but the proportion of doctors and authors with senior titles in North America is slightly higher than that in Europe. And a number of high-yielding core authors emerged in both places. In the aspect of authors' research cooperation, North American authors have more experiences of scientific research cooperation and form a relatively high density cooperative network and a large number of research teams. In terms of scientific research institutions, European authors mainly come from colleges and universities, while North American authors have relatively diverse types of level 2 scientific research institutions in colleges and universities, and have formed a number of research institutions with high yields and at the center of the scientific research cooperation network. North American institutional cooperation network density is also higher than Europe and has more international cooperation.
【作者单位】：上海师范大学体育学院;清华大学体育部;
【基金】：国家社科基金资助项目(17BTY014)
【分类号】：G80-05

【相似文献】