当前位置:主页 > 教育论文 > 体育论文 >

第31届奥运会体操女子团体赛得失分对比分析

发布时间:2018-07-11 12:25

  本文选题:奥运会 + 女子体操 ; 参考:《山西大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:对2016年里约奥运会女子体操项目的比赛成绩做出准确的统计并在此基础上进行科学的比较分析,能够从数据中找到目前世界高水平运动员在比赛中的得分点,进一步明确我国运动员在比赛中同优秀选手之间的差距,这不仅能够为我国运动员今后的参赛和备战提供一个更加明确的指向,同时也能够让众多从事国家队训练备战的工作人员更加清晰的认识到我国运动员在训练中存在哪些需要继续保持的得分点。因此本文以第31届里约奥运会女子团体项目决赛(前四名)得失分对比情况为研究对象,通过对比赛得失分的统计分析进一步明确国外高水平选手的优势以及我国选手存在的问题,并结合国际奥运会采用的2013年版竞技体操规则为参考,以及技术动作评分为标准,在此基础上运用相关理论知识和方法,进一步完善我国优秀女子体操运动员的训练和备战情况,为上级部门提供一个今后指导不同训练等级运动员训练和参赛的建议,从而提高我国女子体操运动员的综合竞技水平,为我国竞技体操项目的持续发展做出一点微薄贡献。本研究通过文献资料法、专家访谈法、录像分析法、数理统计法和对比分析法等研究方法,对第31届奥运会体操女子团体决赛得失分成绩进行对比分析,得出以下研究结论:(1)从比赛整体来看,美国队的优势比较明显,整个比赛过程没有明显失误,而我国选手由于对团体比赛的认知程度比较低,一些高水平运动员在比赛中出现了几次较大失误,成绩直线下滑。(2)在比赛的整体难度上,美国队凭借明显的力量优势和技术优势同后续队伍形成了较大差距,而我国选手在整体难度上仅次于美国队,但是在跳马项目上的难度还需进一步提高。而日本、英国、德国在一些项目上的难度分已经同中美俄三国缩小了差距。(3)在比赛的整体完成质量上,美国队以接近零失误的表现排在各参赛队之首,而我国选手由于两次重大失误导致在完成分上比较低。而荷兰、德国等国家则凭借较低难度的动作获得了高完成分。(4)在跳马项目上,美国队的优势较为明显,同时俄罗斯队表现也较为出色,中国选手在技术上难以达到与程菲相匹配的能力,导致了我国选手普遍存在腾空高度不够、腾空屈膝等专项技术的扣分点,逐渐同俄罗斯和美国的力量型选手拉开了差距。(5)在高低杠项目上,美国队表现中规中矩,其在弱势项目上也采取了以稳为主的比赛策略,但是中国队由于商春松的失误导致了比赛成绩的下滑,选手在高低杠上同其他国家的差距在进一步减小。(6)在平衡木项目上,美国选手凭借较高的稳定性领先于中国队,但是中美两国仍然是这一项目上的优势国家,同其他国家间形成了较大的差距。(7)在自由操项目上,美国队的霸主地位无法撼动,高难动作男子化,H组的难度动作完成质量很高,我国选手毛艺的重大失误导致比分与美国队和俄罗斯队形成了很大的差距。在此基础上,针对我国选手今后的训练和备战提出以下建议:(1)加强女子体操梯队建设:形成明确的新老衔接机制,增加队员的大赛经验。(2)加强不同项目训练的针对性:优势项目提升难度,劣势项目稳定基础。(3)加强运动员心理素质训练:注重赛前辅导评估与赛后调整与疏导。(4)加强运动员力量素质训练:专人指导、创新手段、缩小差距。
[Abstract]:On the basis of the accurate statistics of the results of the women's gymnastics events in the Rio Olympic Games in 2016 and the scientific comparison and Analysis on this basis, we can find out the points of the world high level athletes in the competition from the data, and further clarify the gap between the athletes and the excellent players in the competition, which can not only be used for me. At the same time, the athletes who are engaged in the training of the national team have a clearer understanding of what needs to be kept in the training of our athletes. Therefore, the final four of the thirty-first Rio Olympic Games women's group final (first four) According to the statistical analysis of the score and loss of the competition, the advantages of the high level foreign players and the problems existing in our country are further clarified by the statistical analysis of the score and loss of the competition. Knowledge and methods, further improve the training and preparation of excellent women gymnasts in our country, and provide a suggestion for the superior departments to guide the training and competition of different training class athletes in the future, so as to improve the comprehensive competitive level of Chinese gymnasts and make a little bit for the sustainable development of our competitive gymnasts. By means of literature, expert interview, video analysis, mathematical statistics and comparative analysis, this study makes a comparative analysis of the score and loss scores of the women's team final in the thirty-first Olympic Games, and draws the following conclusions: (1) from the overall point of view of the competition, the advantages of the United States team are more obvious, the whole process of the competition. There are no obvious mistakes, and the Chinese players have a low level of cognition to the group competition. Some high level athletes have made several big mistakes in the competition and the results have slipped straight. (2) in the overall difficulty of the competition, the United States has formed a big gap with the follow-up team with obvious strength advantage and technical advantage, and the Chinese players are in great gap. The difficulty of the overall difficulty is second to the United States team, but the difficulty in the vault needs to be further improved. While Japan, the UK, and Germany have narrowed the gap between the two countries. (3) in the overall quality of the competition, the United States team is the first of the teams to be close to zero error, and the Chinese players Holland, Germany and other countries gained high completion points with lower difficulty. (4) in the vault, the advantage of the United States was more obvious and the Russian team was better, and the Chinese players were unable to match Cheng Fei's ability to match Cheng Fei. In our country, there is a general gap between the height of the vacant height, the point of the vacant knee and other special techniques, and the gap between the Russian and American strength players. (5) on the uneven bars project, the United States has shown the best performance, and it has also adopted a stable competition strategy on the disadvantaged projects, but the Chinese team is due to the mistakes of the Chinese pine. The difference between the players on the uneven bars and other countries was further reduced. (6) on the balance beam project, the United States led to the Chinese team with high stability, but China and the United States are still the dominant country on this project, forming a big gap with other countries. (7) the free exercise program. On the other hand, the hegemony of the American team can not be shaken and the difficult action is masculine. The difficulty of the H group is very high. The major error of Chinese players' wool art leads to a big gap between the American team and the Russian team. On this basis, the following suggestions are put forward to our athletes' training and preparation in the future: (1) strengthening the women's Gymnastic ladder. Team building: forming a clear new and old link mechanism to increase the experience of the players in the competition. (2) strengthening the pertinence of different project training: the difficulty of improving the superiority project, the stable foundation of the inferior project. (3) strengthen the athletes' psychological quality training: pay attention to the pre game guidance evaluation and after the competition adjustment and guide. (4) strengthen the strength quality training of the athletes: special person guidance, Innovative means to narrow the gap.
【学位授予单位】:山西大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G832

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 侯海燕;;第45届世界体操锦标赛中国体操队成绩分析[J];体育文化导刊;2015年05期

2 竭晓安;;从第44届世锦赛看新周期国际女子体操竞争格局及各单项发展趋势[J];北京体育大学学报;2014年11期

3 方向丽;王万朋;韩恩力;;我国女子体操项目优势区域分析——基于第6-12届全运会[J];河北体育学院学报;2014年02期

4 刘岩;;第30届奥运会我国女子竞技体操比赛失利的原因分析[J];南京体育学院学报(自然科学版);2012年05期

5 陈旭晖;;从第43届体操世锦赛审视中国女子体操队伦敦奥运会的竞争实力[J];成都体育学院学报;2012年06期

6 韩华;卢庆荣;;当今世界女子自由体操技术发展的新趋向——第42届世界体操锦标赛分析[J];济宁学院学报;2012年03期

7 傅芳香;宋允清;;从近三届奥运会评析我国体操女队的实力及伦敦奥运会备战的策略[J];四川体育科学;2012年03期

8 陈立农;唐晓丹;;从43届世界体操锦标赛前瞻伦敦奥运会中国女子竞技体操[J];广州体育学院学报;2012年03期

9 王海云;李佐惠;;从第42、43两届体操世锦赛比赛成绩分析中国女子体操队现状[J];安徽体育科技;2012年02期

10 姚可军;;从2011年第43届体操锦标赛看伦敦奥运会女子竞技体操的前景[J];南京体育学院学报(社会科学版);2012年02期

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 冯瑞;中国竞技体操制胜规律探骊[D];上海体育学院;2010年

相关硕士学位论文 前4条

1 危琳琳;我国女子竞技体操的训练理念与规则演变的关系[D];集美大学;2012年

2 张泽军;女子竞技体操评分规则的演变特征及影响因素研究[D];河北师范大学;2006年

3 朱e,

本文编号:2115195


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/tylw/2115195.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户8b579***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com